Sponsored

Oil Catch Can. Yes or No?

Do you have a catch can?


  • Total voters
    44

VAMike

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
3,390
Reaction score
4,408
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat SuperCab
The effectiveness of a can shouldn't really be based on what it catches, but rather what it misses and allows to re-enter the intake.
That doesn't even matter: what's actually important is whether the catch can affects the frequency of engine repairs. And that's a question that no amount of confirmation bias can really answer.
 

Racket

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
2,205
Reaction score
3,406
Location
Here and There
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat Supercrew 2WD
Occupation
Transient
Installed the Mishimoto catch can Saturday 4/10. Two hours to install totally sucks if you have large hands which I do. Be prepared to loose some skin squeezing your hand between frame and body to release the clip on block mount, the worse part is pressing the new clip down
on the Mishimoto house mount. Intake manifold side is easier
When I looked into the catch can JLT had the easiest install; you only took loose the easier connection and the return (?) line snapped into the factory hose - it really was clever and would make returning the truck to stock easier. It's too bad their can is the least effective at capturing vapor.

If I were designing one it would be dual vacuum like the UPR, the nice mount of the Mishimoto and the ease of install of the JLT.

There would be no reason to skimp on components but a way to monitor levels of contaminants in the can and drain it without hassle or getting crap all over would be paramount.

UPR seems to have the best can and connectors while Mishimoto has theirs in a well thought out place visually. Early versions of the JLT placed the can at the highest point which is important to effectiveness; you had to remove the vanity piece from the top of the Lariat engine though.

With the low tension piston rings and high compression ratio turbocharged motor, it seems to me anyone who plans on keeping their truck for a long time, driving it hard (+ performance mods) would find value in the catch can.

Tailgate dampers not withstanding.
 
Last edited:

HenryMac

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Threads
66
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
5,360
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2019 SuperCab XL - FX4 - Magnetic - Rocksliders
Occupation
Mech. Engineer - Retired
If Ford were to include every single thing that us consumers think that they should, we would be paying twice the price for our trucks.
We're already there. It's impossible to buy a basic truck today.

No power windows, no air conditioning, no collision alert, no cruise control, no anti-lock brakes.

You know, just a basic bare bones truck.
 

Trigganometry

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Threads
153
Messages
5,833
Reaction score
25,359
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
20 XLT scab 301A/tow 4X4 magnetic w/sport blackout
Occupation
Engineering
We're already there. It's impossible to buy a basic truck today.

No power windows, no air conditioning, no collision alert, no cruise control, no anti-lock brakes.

You know, just a basic bare bones truck.
Won’t be long before you see plenty of them because of chip shortages. They will go back to callin them fleet trucks that are stripped to bare bones because they didn’t have the parts to add!!!
 


the5Gmartian

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jesse
Joined
May 29, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
413
Reaction score
1,151
Location
Washington, D.C.
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4
Occupation
U.S. Navy
Then in lieu of a catch can miss measuring meter the obvious solution would be to install a secondary catch can to catch what the primary can misses. But it might get expensive, some of those catch cans are pricey.
If you’re not running 4 catch cans, you’re doing it wrong
 

dtech

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Threads
38
Messages
3,136
Reaction score
7,582
Location
colorado
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat FX4, chromed and forever damperless
If you’re not running 4 catch cans, you’re doing it wrong
yes just like in the distillation of alcoholic spirits, multiple distillations can improve the quality of the catch can end product, I want finely distilled liquids in my catch can(s) . Since I already have a UPR installed my next in line can might be a mishimoto or the JLT , I need to begin that eval process along with scoping out the possible locations in the engine compartment. I'm only hoping I don't catch so much volatile vapor that I need to run a flare like used in oil refining.
 

puckdodger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Jan 16, 2021
Threads
31
Messages
902
Reaction score
3,496
Location
Oshawa
Vehicle(s)
2020 Black Lariat 2020 SOLD Black Cadillac XT5
That's the kind of testing you'd expect the catch can manufacturers would do, right? And then publish that data to prove the can is actually beneficial.

They don't. And I find that telling. Anything to show that a catch can is cost justified on our specific Ranger motors, you know, the motors that already come from the factory with a separator.
I don't think Ford, or GM or any manufacturer of TDI engines for that matter, would install a catch can at the factory because people are generally lazy or ignorant and wouldn't empty it which could lead to other problems, or they would think that there is something wrong with the engine in the first place if it needs something extra like that under the hood.
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
386
Reaction score
725
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
Update on my catch can experience. Been running them for about 6 mos now. Mishimoto cans on both the valve cover breather side and the crankcase side. For every 5 times I empty the crankcase side can I might need to empty the breather side can. In cold weather the crankcase side can is 1/3 full after 2 tanks of gas. Mixture is 75% fuel and 25% water moisture / oil. Seeing as the valve stems never get washed in fuel (unlike non-DI engines), I am happy to keep this mixture from getting all over the valves and forming a build up of airflow restrictive sludge over time like what happened in my Nissan 5.6 DI engine at 95k.
 

Samsquanch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
376
Reaction score
833
Location
Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2017 Expedition XLT
This thread is pretty long and a lot to digest at this point. If I were to add a catch can would it catch most or all of the fuel that is ending up in my oil so I could effectively “move on” from dealing with that or would it not be effective? For those that previously had an issue with that did the catch can help?

Secondly, I see it’s about a 2-3 hour install but are we talking completely reversible with no major signs of the install if the truck needed to go in for warranty work? I really don’t trust my local dealer for warranty shenanigans with an aftermarket upgrade like this. I wouldn’t take it in for any oil changes so it would only be if there was a major recall or repair needed I would want to be able to take this thing off.
 

Gixxers

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joshua
Joined
Nov 21, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
124
Reaction score
74
Location
15644
Vehicle(s)
2020 ranger
Occupation
Steelworkers
Update on my catch can experience. Been running them for about 6 mos now. Mishimoto cans on both the valve cover breather side and the crankcase side. For every 5 times I empty the crankcase side can I might need to empty the breather side can. In cold weather the crankcase side can is 1/3 full after 2 tanks of gas. Mixture is 75% fuel and 25% water moisture / oil. Seeing as the valve stems never get washed in fuel (unlike non-DI engines), I am happy to keep this mixture from getting all over the valves and forming a build up of airflow restrictive sludge over time like what happened in my Nissan 5.6 DI engine at 95k.
Been thinking of putting one on the valve cover side, got and tips and care to share some pics of your set up?
 

jblc

Well-Known Member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Threads
75
Messages
749
Reaction score
644
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2021 XLT FX2 supercab
Mixture is 75% fuel and 25% water moisture / oil. Seeing as the valve stems never get washed in fuel (unlike non-DI engines), I am happy to keep this mixture from getting all over the valves
Someone else pointed out on this thread, that there's a chance this is condensing because of the long catch can lines / catch can temperature. Ie, if it was not there, the vapor would remain hot and combust in the engine as designed (vs condensing to a catch can)

This is a good question, although I tend to believe a can is helpful.

Does anyone know more about this?
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
386
Reaction score
725
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
Someone else pointed out on this thread, that there's a chance this is condensing because of the long catch can lines / catch can temperature. Ie, if it was not there, the vapor would remain hot and combust in the engine as designed (vs condensing to a catch can)

This is a good question, although I tend to believe a can is helpful.

Does anyone know more about this?
The long lines do help the vapors to cool / condense and get caught in the can easier. But whether it’s hot vapor or not, either way it’s passing over your valves on the intake stroke.

This mod is about a long term benefit if you plan on keeping your truck for over 100k+ mi. If you are gonna trade it in after 3 yrs then it may not be a mod to consider because the cleanliness of the valve chambers long term for peak performance is not a concern.
 
 








Top