IdahoRanger
Well-Known Member
I can't see what you avatar is. ?Thank you, Smarty Britches!?
Sponsored
I can't see what you avatar is. ?Thank you, Smarty Britches!?
? She's gonna kill me for this but it's so worth it.?I can't see what you avatar is. ?
Well if Phil hadnāt chimed in I would have assumed that anyone that says itās bad to let the truck warm up in the morning was just trying to do their part to limit emissions and feel good about themselves.
Kind of like how all the journalists say safety is strictly a factor of the cars design, and mass doesnāt affect anything. Some people (most journalists) donāt want people going out and buying heavy cars (which are safer, all things bring equal) because that would cause increased emissions.
Well, kind of extreme don't you think? Me warming my truck for only 30 seconds or so has NOTHING to do with was just trying to do their part to limit emissions and feel good about themselves.Well if Phil hadnāt chimed in I would have assumed that anyone that says itās bad to let the truck warm up in the morning was just trying to do their part to limit emissions and feel good about themselves.
Kind of like how all the journalists say safety is strictly a factor of the cars design, and mass doesnāt affect anything. Some people (most journalists) donāt want people going out and buying heavy cars (which are safer, all things bring equal) because that would cause increased emissions.
My bad, I read hasn't, not the hadn't, you wrote referencing Phil.I did read Philās post, and referenced it in my comment. And I think you are right, your 30 seconds has little to do with increased emissions. But the media donāt consider your 30 seconds. They consider 30 seconds over many millions of vehicles.
All Iām saying is that sometimes itās not paranoia to be skeptical. And this is one of those instances when there is plenty of incentive for the media to tilt the scales.
Lots of experts will say don't let you motor idle warm up before driving, wastes gas, takes longer to warm up, leaves sweat in the exhaust system longer, etc... Never heard the "oil starvation" thing. I will remote start my truck and let it idle until I am in the cab and buckled up. I dont wait until it is all the way warm to drive . I do take it easy until all warmed up to avoid drier bearings especially on the turbo.Hope @P. A. Schilke chimes in: Was reading that starting the vehicle and letting warm up VS start driving directly is bad, in the long term, for the engine. Several reliable references confirmed this. saying that parts of the engine/trans could be starved of oil, thus accelerating wear.
As it has been -10 around here lately, I use remote start so it's warmer inside when I get in... not per sa to warm the engine to get the oil flowing before a load is put on it by driving.
Given that we use 5w-30 or even 0w-30 and the idle is 1200 to 1500 rpm till the catalytic converter is warmed up, I don't see where the oil starvation would come from.
Your thoughts...
OK, here's the thing... I agree with: Don't waste gas letting it idle... environmental issues and all. Agree, support all that, etc.Lots of experts will say don't let you motor idle warm up before driving, wastes gas, takes longer to warm up, leaves sweat in the exhaust system longer, etc... Never heard the "oil starvation" thing. I will remote start my truck and let it idle until I am in the cab and buckled up. I dont wait until it is all the way warm to drive . I do take it easy until all warmed up to avoid drier bearings especially on the turbo.
Yes - It is better mechanically to warm up when the engine is cold - below 45 degrees F.With all that, I will point out that NO ONE has answered the central question:
Is it MECHANICALLY better for the a. engine b. rest of drive train to start and do at least a 1 to 2 minute warm-up (till it comes fast idle to warm the catalytic converter) OR it does not matter (in any practical sense)?? Anything EPA, environmental to be disregarded.
? She's gonna kill me for this but it's so worth it.?
Full pic in Tracy's avatar. ?
OK, here's the thing... I agree with: Don't waste gas letting it idle... environmental issues and all. Agree, support all that, etc.
My modus operandi is:
1. Wake up... finally
2. have coffee... second wake up...
3. Tylenol to get all the joints moving...
4. Look out the window and check the temp...
4a. -0... remote start the Ranger, EPA, etc. be damned... 15 min only - for me not the truck
4b. 0 to 32... most likely remote start... , EPA, etc. be damned... 15 min only - for me not the truck
4c. 32+ no remote start, just get in , start, idle while I buckle up; pull away in less than 1 min.
If 4a or 4b:
a. one last hit of coffee (or take a thermal mug with me)
b. given that the state of the Ranger in winter is most often this:
c. head on out and clean it off while on remote start... 4 to 5 minutes to clean off.
d. get in; start; buckle up; start driving.
With all that, I will point out that NO ONE has answered the central question:
Is it MECHANICALLY better for the a. engine b. rest of drive train to start and do at least a 1 to 2 minute warm-up (till it comes fast idle to warm the catalytic converter) OR it does not matter (in any practical sense)?? Anything EPA, environmental to be disregarded.