- Banned
- #46
I'll give you the union part.Yeah... a lot behind the scenes... like improper programming of robots that place and weld body panels incorrectly. Or, the assembly worker that wadded up his candy wrapper and stuffed it into my part bracket... or, the assembly worker that passed my front wheel alignment with crash bar interference... yeah, mass production technique is good for Ford but why do most other manufacturers get it right? Many of the issues that many of us have had to accept with our ~$50k trucks are not present when the same vehicles are manufactured in Asia. The perception of quality is in the eye of the beholder. I think Michigan puts out a crappy product to the NA market because they think they can get away with it. I love the design of my truck but Ford has allowed sub par assembly in their Michigan plant. Then they blame their failures on "mass production". I strongly disagree! Mass production technique is used in the Asian plants. Why is their process so superior?
Yeah... a lot behind the scenes... general disrespect for this NA market customer, Ford investor demand and greed, unionized workers that feel entitled... a lack of effective QA... NA customers that accept poor treatment while paying premiums that aren't commensurate with this product and included services. Don't even get me started on the warranty process... Wow! ?
But did you ever think that many of your problems can be blamed on when your truck was built?
I'm as sick of the pandemic excuse as the next guy, but most of these silly problems and so called decontenting happened in '21s and on.
The only thing that really concerns me about my truck is it's Oct '20 build date.
After seeing the way companies have performed over the last year you couldn't pay me to buy a '21 or '22 vehicle.
And if you paid $50k for a Ranger, you're a sucker.
I've been saying since I've been here that the majority of the so-called cost cutting cuts were probably more-so supply chain related.To those concerned about cost cutting…
In the face in one of the largest supply chain disruptions in modern history, would you rather:
1) see the MSRP on newer models increase to reflect the actual costs of sourcing all of the original features, and watch delivery times slip to years for fully “featured” vehicles, or
2) see MSRP increases similar to traditional jumps (I.e inflation) and have a few peripheral features removed in order to deliver in an admittedly longer timeline, but still within 6 mo of order?
To slightly misquote a business book I read, “ No position is valid until is it posed as a choice.” They were talking about strategy, but I think it holds.
Sponsored
Last edited: