Oil Catch Can. Yes or No?

RedlandRanger

Moderator
First Name
Rob
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Threads
35
Messages
4,592
Reaction score
8,826
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4, 1973 Mercury Capri
Vehicle Showcase
1
Hi Rob,

Correct to a point. The 90% is the customer. A Severe usage customer that is in the top 10% of customers that beat the crap out of their vehicle...Purolator Courrier in Los Angeles with stop and go...oil field service in Texas...Mining operations in Arizona. That means the "regular" customer can expect better performance than that. I am always proud when prior Ranger owners say their older Rangers gave then 200,000 of miles of service or greater. 36,000 is a warranty...not our test requirement. If you ever rode over our durability test route for one lap...you would likely say no way the truck can last for more than a few more laps....It is super severe. Coupled with 1000 cycles of P3-26D pot holes...200 yards of 6" deep steel lined pot holes in a pattern that is so bone jarring that the test track drives can only do about 100 cycles each to keep from kidney damage. Built Ford Tough really means something.

Make Sense?

Best,
Phil Schilke
Ranger Vehicle Engineering
Ford Motor Co. Retired
I knew you'd say it better than I did. The bottom line is that these trucks are engineered to go a long time - not planned obsolescence as soon as the warranty is done - they are just getting started when the warranty expires!!!
Sponsored

 

landiscarrier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Threads
17
Messages
889
Reaction score
2,178
Location
Pocono Mtns Pa
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat, Focus ST
Occupation
Sales
Open the hood of any stock modern day direct injection car or truck (performance built or not) and look for the factory installed catch can......you'll be looking for a long time.
 

Ace Holliday

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scott K
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
405
Reaction score
885
Location
South Kalifornikstan
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT Super Crew
Occupation
Aerospace Machinist/CNC Programmer - Retired
I am glad I installed a catch can. It alerted me to my "fuel in the oil" issue.

I check the contents of the catch can every couple of weeks. My truck has 7,300 miles on it. Every time it was checked there was almost nothing in it. I was to the point of thinking I wasted my money. Then about two weeks ago when I checked it it was almost half full of gasoline. Now after ever 150 miles or so there is an ounce of gas in the catch can. (Oil level on the dipstick was up almost a half an inch over full).

I am currently working with my dealership to resolve the issue. They are still in the denial stage. My Blackstone results will be back next week.
 

Racket

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
21
Messages
1,730
Reaction score
2,353
Location
Here and There
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat Supercrew 2WD
Occupation
Transient
I knew you'd say it better than I did. The bottom line is that these trucks are engineered to go a long time - not planned obsolescence as soon as the warranty is done - they are just getting started when the warranty expires!!!
When I worked at NASA I noticed one of the engineers drove a pickup truck. I knew he could afford anything he wanted and asked why a truck? His response was that trucks are over-engineered compared to sedans from alternators to cooling, suspension and brakes etc. therefore a more reliable form of transportation. We didn't debate efficiency costs, but back then he was driving a small-ish truck (can't remember the make - coulda been a Datsun).
 

tjanok

Well-Known Member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Threads
9
Messages
60
Reaction score
36
Location
USA, MI
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger
I'm heavily surprised by the amount of resistance some people have to a catch can. Manufactures know valve build up is a long running issue, but installing a catch can IS NOT ever going to be a recommend fix from Ford (or anyone). It's another maintenance item that won't be followed.

Ford gave up and started doing secondary multi-point injection because there just isn't a better alternative yet.

And after seeing the build up on my Focus with 30k, there's no way I'd hesitate installing one.

For shits and giggles I used a scope on my dads F150 (3.5 eb) with 150k and no catch can, an absolutely nightmare on the valves. However, he runs regular fuel and sub-par oil. But so do most uninformed owners.

Your basic owner for this truck will never need one, and that's the way Ford intended. But for others (like myself) who may run a tune, enjoy treating this truck like a "performance vehicle", or want to absolutely extend the maximum life expectancy of this engine (and it's intended power, no - valve build up isn't going to throw a rod). It's a no brainer.
 


Taterbootz

Member
First Name
Shawn
Joined
May 17, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
7
Location
Suffolk, VA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat FX4
Open the hood of any stock modern day direct injection car or truck (performance built or not) and look for the factory installed catch can......you'll be looking for a long time.
That's a ridiculous statement lol

If it came from the factory, why would we modify it and add one?
 

landiscarrier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Threads
17
Messages
889
Reaction score
2,178
Location
Pocono Mtns Pa
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat, Focus ST
Occupation
Sales
That's a ridiculous statement lol

If it came from the factory, why would we modify it and add one?
That’s a ridiculous response. The point is DI engines are all over the place and not one manufacturer has one installed from the factory. If it was so necessary why wouldn’t the automobile engineers put one on it.

if you want one. Go for it!
 

P. A. Schilke

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Threads
141
Messages
7,012
Reaction score
36,169
Location
GV Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
Occupation
Engineer Retired
Vehicle Showcase
1
Hi Folks,

Many of you may not follow the Formula 1 racing, where the manufacturers suppositorly are the forefront of technology....The engines are Di with secondary intake injection...not for carbon build up but because of the power increase. Mercedes has achieved a 50% efficiency...unheard of before with a internal combustion engine. So to imply that Ford installed secondary injectors to solve this carbon buildup on the intake valves may or not be the reason. Efficeniency and power were likely the reason... This is JMO. Do not infer that when Ford installed intake injectors it was because they did not install catch cans.

You want to install a catch can....great...the aftermarket is happy to take your money. You like the look...install chrome tire valve stem caps. Are they necessary? Nope... But I guess the catch can looks cool and you get to drain them to justify your expense and installation. If you have data of the long term durability of the motor with and without a catchcan it would be interesting.

Have been stated before...if Ford determined that a catch can was needed it would be there.

Another back story of sorts. Not really a back story. Ford tests and tests every new vehicle and every powertrain as well as many interim mods or changes. These changes are not done in a vacuum. There is much testing and more importantly, documentation. There is a process called DVPR...Design Verification and Proveout Report. The operative word here is Report. We engineers spend much time writing reports of our testing and these reports are archived as part of the vehicle program. These reports are reviewed and signed off by two levels of management if not more and are kept as part of the development or revision of a model, Ie Ranger for a government requirement as well as our corporate record retention directive. We do not launch a vehicle with a bunch of nebulous and hidden tests or decisions. All our documentation is subject to discovery in any lawsuit. We are trained to document specifically what testing was preformed and what the results were in detail including conclusions and recommendations as it may apply. For example...if a test vehicle broke a suspension bolt... The lab analysis of this failure was documented. Our overall report would include more than the fact the bolt broke, but what testing was being conducted under what parameters were specified...eg loaded to GVW. What we will not write as you see here on these forums as inflammatory statements is "this catastrophic failure". Simply stated...the bolt broke in half. See what I mean?

I see on these forums the statements...How did Ford screw this up...omit this and so on. The take way is that we do not do vehicle development or modification in a vacuum...there is documentation and this documentation is archived with the program per government or corporate requirements.

I am done with my stand on the soap box.

best,
Phil Schilke
Ranger Vehicle Engineering
Ford Motor Co. Retired
 

Big Blue

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
May 5, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
3,124
Reaction score
6,971
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT FX4 Supercrew lighting blue
Occupation
Retired mechanical designer
Hi Folks,

Many of you may not follow the Formula 1 racing, where the manufacturers suppositorly are the forefront of technology....The engines are Di with secondary intake injection...not for carbon build up but because of the power increase. Mercedes has achieved a 50% efficiency...unheard of before with a internal combustion engine. So to imply that Ford installed secondary injectors to solve this carbon buildup on the intake valves may or not be the reason. Efficeniency and power were likely the reason... This is JMO. Do not infer that when Ford installed intake injectors it was because they did not install catch cans.

You want to install a catch can....great...the aftermarket is happy to take your money. You like the look...install chrome tire valve stem caps. Are they necessary? Nope... But I guess the catch can looks cool and you get to drain them to justify your expense and installation. If you have data of the long term durability of the motor with and without a catchcan it would be interesting.

Have been stated before...if Ford determined that a catch can was needed it would be there.

Another back story of sorts. Not really a back story. Ford tests and tests every new vehicle and every powertrain as well as many interim mods or changes. These changes are not done in a vacuum. There is much testing and more importantly, documentation. There is a process called DVPR...Design Verification and Proveout Report. The operative word here is Report. We engineers spend much time writing reports of our testing and these reports are archived as part of the vehicle program. These reports are reviewed and signed off by two levels of management if not more and are kept as part of the development or revision of a model, Ie Ranger for a government requirement as well as our corporate record retention directive. We do not launch a vehicle with a bunch of nebulous and hidden tests or decisions. All our documentation is subject to discovery in any lawsuit. We are trained to document specifically what testing was preformed and what the results were in detail including conclusions and recommendations as it may apply. For example...if a test vehicle broke a suspension bolt... The lab analysis of this failure was documented. Our overall report would include more than the fact the bolt broke, but what testing was being conducted under what parameters were specified...eg loaded to GVW. What we will not write as you see here on these forums as inflammatory statements is "this catastrophic failure". Simply stated...the bolt broke in half. See what I mean?

I see on these forums the statements...How did Ford screw this up...omit this and so on. The take way is that we do not do vehicle development or modification in a vacuum...there is documentation and this documentation is archived with the program per government or corporate requirements.

I am done with my stand on the soap box.

best,
Phil Schilke
Ranger Vehicle Engineering
Ford Motor Co. Retired
Very well put Phil. Many of the point you make apply across all types of industry, not just automotive. In my 45 years as a designer of converting equipment for a consumer products company. It was constantly impressed on us that we are liable for our designs. Both for the people working them producing the product and the end consumer. Thank heaven in my career I never had a design of mine fail "catastrophically" and somebody get hurt. Had it happened all my notes would have been subject to discovery as you pointed out and I could have been called to testify in court and possibly liability in the case. As you said nothing is done in a vacuum all designs are subject multiple reviews for both functional and safety aspects. As well as many walk throughs during installation and startup. This practice is industry wide not exclusive to the automotive industry.

This thread is so two sided that there is no right answer. Put on catch can or don't, your truck your decision. Continued bickering will not convince anyone to change their mind if they already have it made up. I could go on but why, there are already 30 pages of arguments for both sides with very little documented independent evidence on either side.

Like Phil now off my soap box. Thank for your time.
 

PierreD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
59
Reaction score
70
Location
Ottawa CA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XLT
Occupation
AV Tech
Open the hood of any stock modern day direct injection car or truck (performance built or not) and look for the factory installed catch can......you'll be looking for a long time.
Why are people then changing/adding shocks, exhaust, tires, Tunes, transmission coolers, superchargers etc etc etc
 

landiscarrier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Threads
17
Messages
889
Reaction score
2,178
Location
Pocono Mtns Pa
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat, Focus ST
Occupation
Sales
Why are people then changing/adding shocks, exhaust, tires, Tunes, transmission coolers, superchargers etc etc etc
Not even a close comparison. It’s your truck, do whatever you want to it.
 

Racket

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
21
Messages
1,730
Reaction score
2,353
Location
Here and There
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat Supercrew 2WD
Occupation
Transient
Hi Folks,

Many of you may not follow the Formula 1 racing, where the manufacturers suppositorly are the forefront of technology....The engines are Di with secondary intake injection...not for carbon build up but because of the power increase. Mercedes has achieved a 50% efficiency...unheard of before with a internal combustion engine. So to imply that Ford installed secondary injectors to solve this carbon buildup on the intake valves may or not be the reason. Efficeniency and power were likely the reason... This is JMO. Do not infer that when Ford installed intake injectors it was because they did not install catch cans.

You want to install a catch can....great...the aftermarket is happy to take your money. If you have data of the long term durability of the motor with and without a catchcan it would be interesting.

Have been stated before...if Ford determined that a catch can was needed it would be there.

Another back story of sorts. Not really a back story. Ford tests and tests every new vehicle and every powertrain as well as many interim mods or changes. These changes are not done in a vacuum. There is much testing and more importantly, documentation. There is a process called DVPR...Design Verification and Proveout Report. The operative word here is Report. We engineers spend much time writing reports of our testing and these reports are archived as part of the vehicle program. These reports are reviewed and signed off by two levels of management if not more and are kept as part of the development or revision of a model, Ie Ranger for a government requirement as well as our corporate record retention directive. We do not launch a vehicle with a bunch of nebulous and hidden tests or decisions. All our documentation is subject to discovery in any lawsuit.

I am done with my stand on the soap box.

best,
Phil Schilke
Ranger Vehicle Engineering
Ford Motor Co. Retired
Ford admitting a catch can will provide any benefit would certainly open them to potential lawsuits. The factory warranty is the closest guarantee for durability consumers are going to get, and the point that deposits aren't going to break the engine is valid. I read somewhere of a performance shop offering injector rails to put even more juice in the motor (and ahead of the intake) but really - that's going to tank efficiency and emissions completely besides increasing the risk of blowing the motor.

I have my body of proof every time I've emptied my catch can. That's stuff that didn't go through the intake. That may be about efficiency as much as performance. Interesting what else ends up in the crankcase.
 

tjanok

Well-Known Member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Threads
9
Messages
60
Reaction score
36
Location
USA, MI
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger
Ford admitting a catch can will provide any benefit would certainly open them to potential lawsuits. The factory warranty is the closest guarantee for durability consumers are going to get, and the point that deposits aren't going to break the engine is valid. I read somewhere of a performance shop offering injector rails to put even more juice in the motor (and ahead of the intake) but really - that's going to tank efficiency and emissions completely besides increasing the risk of blowing the motor.

I have my body of proof every time I've emptied my catch can. That's stuff that didn't go through the intake. That may be about efficiency as much as performance. Interesting what else ends up in the crankcase.
Stratified offers their "aux fueling" that, for all intensive purposes, completely eliminates carbon build up. Plus, (although some people just aren't going to bend their opinion) each modern DI engine from Ford, Mazda and VW DO HAVE a catch can. The PCV baffle is pretty much doing the same thing, by just keeping the junk in the crank case. Abit just not as well obviously.
 

Sashimi_Moto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
225
Reaction score
319
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
2012 E450 C-Class, 2019 Ranger Lariat 501A FX4
That’s a ridiculous response. The point is DI engines are all over the place and not one manufacturer has one installed from the factory. If it was so necessary why wouldn’t the automobile engineers put one on it.

if you want one. Go for it!
Engineers don't build cars - finance does. The CBA doesn't justify the inclusion of said device.
 

jsphlynch

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Threads
11
Messages
907
Reaction score
2,436
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XL
Ford admitting a catch can will provide any benefit would certainly open them to potential lawsuits.
Lawsuits for what, exactly? Let's assume for the sake of the argument that a catch can has a tangible benefit. If Ford suddenly start including them, that doesn't mean that Ford was in any way negligent with their prior design, it just means that the prior design was suboptimal.
Sponsored

 
 



Top