Some vehicles have different weight ratings with and without a wdh, the ranger does not. If (as so many seem convinced) it were insanely dangerous to run the ranger at its rated capacity without a wdh, ford would have rated it 3000/7500 (with/without wdh) rather than 7500/7500. But they didn't. It was tested at 7500 without a wdh, and managed to meet the braking and handling requirements.There is another reason to use a weight distribution set up that no one has brought up yet, if towing a trailer with a heavy tongue weight...steering and braking.
Yes, the Rangers hitch could probably handle the tongue weight, and pull a heavy trailer without a WDH.
But it may very well put a lot of weight on the rear, which makes for very light steering. That is dangerous. If you have ever driven a pickup hauling a heavy load over and behind the rear axle, you know what I am referring too.
Also, the front brakes are responsible for round 70% of the vehicles braking, and if the front is not planted, you lose braking.
A WDH set up transfers weigh back to the front.
Personally, I have used a WDH on every camper, from 16 foot on up.
Nobody has said a WDH is required to tow 7500 pounds with the Ranger. What we are saying that for some instances it is a good idea for a better towing experience. Can it do it yes it can. Is there maybe a better way, yes there is.Some vehicles have different weight ratings with and without a wdh, the ranger does not. If (as so many seem convinced) it were insanely dangerous to run the ranger at its rated capacity without a wdh, ford would have rated it 3000/7500 (with/without wdh) rather than 7500/7500. But they didn't. It was tested at 7500 without a wdh, and managed to meet the braking and handling requirements.
Yeah, I get that. Some people post about why one might need a wdh in some circumstances (but also things to try first, like fixing the weight distribution of the trailer), others post that they will never not use a wdh and paint crazy pictures of an inability to brake without one. But if someone's position is "I will never tow without a wdh because it's my security blanket", I just wonder why they bother posting--because it doesn't really help anyone understand when/why they might need one themselves. I mean sure, do you, but how does that help answer the original question?Has nothing to do with the truck or need. Like @Grumpaw said some people will never change their mind. You do you I'll do me and enjoy my ride.
I have been towing rv's on and off for more than 50 years, and have always used a WDH. I did/have tried without one to see if there was any difference, and, to one who is experienced, there is a distinct difference in the way a rig tow's, and handles.Yeah, I get that. Some people post about why one might need a wdh in some circumstances (but also things to try first, like fixing the weight distribution of the trailer), others post that they will never not use a wdh and paint crazy pictures of an inability to brake without one. But if someone's position is "I will never tow without a wdh because it's my security blanket", I just wonder why they bother posting--because it doesn't really help anyone understand when/why they might need one themselves. I mean sure, do you, but how does that help answer the original question?
Like most threads on this forum this one had it's question answered on the first page and got side tracked into a completely different subject entirely.Yeah, I get that. Some people post about why one might need a wdh in some circumstances (but also things to try first, like fixing the weight distribution of the trailer), others post that they will never not use a wdh and paint crazy pictures of an inability to brake without one. But if someone's position is "I will never tow without a wdh because it's my security blanket", I just wonder why they bother posting--because it doesn't really help anyone understand when/why they might need one themselves. I mean sure, do you, but how does that help answer the original question?
Sorry for one more post!In my experience, my towing is optimized with the use of a WDH in combination with a friction anti sway device. IRT the OP's original question (i.e., the function of the Ranger's installed electronic anti sway capability) I have found my vehicle actually behaves better with the electronic anti sway mode disabled. The friction bar seems to "fool" the truck's OBC into thinking there is trailer sway beginning to occur when, in fact, the friction bar is handling the offending condition (usually wind) exactly as it is supposed to do. I get strange, disconcerting movements in the truck when the friction and electronic anti sway capabilities are in use at the same time.
I am happiest with my truck's handling when the friction bar is in use and the electronic anti sway mode disabled.
Only on rare occasion, and only under extreme wind conditions (those that convince me to just get off the road and wait until the next day). ?Sorry for one more post!
So you have actually had the trucks anti-sway system kick in while traveling with your friction sway bar in use, I mean seen the warning come up on the dash? I believe there is also a audable alarm. If so either you have issues with your setup, or I have mine perfect (which I highly doubt). I have driven across OK, TX, NM and AZ with cross winds and semis. I have never yet seen my ant-sway go off.
OK this is a little different than your first post. If I trusted my setup and a safety system on te truck is going off, I would think it is trying to tell me something. Like in this case "GET OF THE ROAD YOU FOOL! IT'S TOO WINDY". I'm not in the habit of turning off safety devices just just because I THINK they are not telling the truth. Your sway bar is to prevent sway the truck only reacts after sway has started. One should not cause the other.Only on rare occasion, and only under extreme wind conditions (those that convince me to just get off the road and wait until the next day). ?