Well, I would like for them (at the very least), demonstrate to me that this specific issue caused the transmission to practically puke on the highway, and have rough shifting throughout it's entire life. If they come to me with actual evidence that this caused the issue; ie vehicle statistics, engine logs, etc: then I would be more than happy to say. "Hey, I get it; I fucked up, let's fix it. $$$"I can see where the dealer is possibly coming from in not wanting to warranty it. The OEM pan was damaged in an “accident “ ( not a warrantable failure). Repair was done at a non authorized Ford shop and was overfilled. The dealer has no way of telling if the transmission was damaged in the “accident “ and what the repair shops replacing of the pan and overfilling did to the transmission ( not a warrantable failure). It would be different if you had the dealer swap the pans as a precautionary step prior to any “accident “ damage “. Sounds like the repair shop is the source of all your issues not Ford warranty. Just my opinion and probably not what you want to hear. Hopefully the repair shop steps up for you.
Well yeah, but I figured I would give myself a bit of extra reassurance.A rock like that might well break a cast alloy one too.
Lol "Built Ford Tough" apparently not.to exacerbate the OPs battle with Ford, there's been a bit of a shift in Ford's warranty policy (supposedly).
i've got one main guy i've bought my vehicles from over the past 15 years. i recently caught up with him and he was telling me that warranty coverage from Ford has become really painful. Ford tightened up the steps required to get a warranty approved. procedurally it has my particular dealership feeling like they're steps to avoid paying a warranty vs the more "no questions asked" procedures of the past.
all of this is conjecture as Ford would never admit it, but hearing from someone working at the dealer with his service techs who says it's been tough getting simple warranty coverage done... yikes. Ford made news with how much their warranty coverage costs were soaring.. one way to deal with the problem is to cover fewer warranties (as opposed to making products that require fewer warranty coverages).
good luck OP. i really wish you the best!
All they have to do is point to the underbody damage and say you abused the vehicle.Well, I would like for them (at the very least), demonstrate to me that this specific issue caused the transmission to practically puke on the highway, and have rough shifting throughout it's entire life. If they come to me with actual evidence that this caused the issue; ie vehicle statistics, engine logs, etc: then I would be more than happy to say. "Hey, I get it; I fucked up, let's fix it. $$$"
I see this possibly being the case. During my short stint as a service writer at a Ford dealership, it was clear that production quality was taking a huge nosedive. The service manager cracked me up by saying they were kind enough to draw a circle around the problem...to exacerbate the OPs battle with Ford, there's been a bit of a shift in Ford's warranty policy (supposedly).
i've got one main guy i've bought my vehicles from over the past 15 years. i recently caught up with him and he was telling me that warranty coverage from Ford has become really painful. Ford tightened up the steps required to get a warranty approved. procedurally it has my particular dealership feeling like they're steps to avoid paying a warranty vs the more "no questions asked" procedures of the past.
all of this is conjecture as Ford would never admit it, but hearing from someone working at the dealer with his service techs who says it's been tough getting simple warranty coverage done... yikes. Ford made news with how much their warranty coverage costs were soaring.. one way to deal with the problem is to cover fewer warranties (as opposed to making products that require fewer warranty coverages).
good luck OP. i really wish you the best!
Have to totally agree.....All they have to do is point to the underbody damage and say you abused the vehicle.
It sucks. But at the end of the day, these trucks are not intended to land on rocks. There is no way for you to determine the damage from the original hit didn't cause additional damage that caused the tranny to puke.
Modern vehicles should be able to run at that speed effortlessly. Not a bulldozer, but any road vehicle. If you're cursed (as many of us) to use the interstates in California, 80 MPH will get you rear-ended.I think we found the issue. Maybe its not the truck, but the driver. Its not a sports car its a truck. Wring them out all day and they fall apart. I know from experience. This is why I will never buy used again.....
Wow this is how companies get themselves into downward spirals. Ford need to be careful, this is not the message you want to send to your customers.to exacerbate the OPs battle with Ford, there's been a bit of a shift in Ford's warranty policy (supposedly).
i've got one main guy i've bought my vehicles from over the past 15 years. i recently caught up with him and he was telling me that warranty coverage from Ford has become really painful. Ford tightened up the steps required to get a warranty approved. procedurally it has my particular dealership feeling like they're steps to avoid paying a warranty vs the more "no questions asked" procedures of the past.
all of this is conjecture as Ford would never admit it, but hearing from someone working at the dealer with his service techs who says it's been tough getting simple warranty coverage done... yikes. Ford made news with how much their warranty coverage costs were soaring.. one way to deal with the problem is to cover fewer warranties (as opposed to making products that require fewer warranty coverages).
good luck OP. i really wish you the best!
I was going slow, and I actually didn’t even see the rock. Shit just appeared in front of me. It was under me before I hit the brake.I don’t rock crawl, so forgive my ignorance, but is rock crawling supposed to be a speed race or a technical obstacle run? It would seem to me that if the cross members and skid plate are smashed, and the oil pan was damaged, then the driver was clearly on a rock trail going too fast. A skid plate is meant to “skid” to protect what is protects, not to take full weight of the vehicle while smashing down on a rock. Also, the claim for the clunky transmission before the mishap becomes moot once you smash the undercarriage and oil pan. No way to know, or even prove, that the transmission was damage prior to the crash. The transmission issue should have been tended to, or at least documented before the undercarriage damage, and even then it would be a tough fight.
I will always use a Ford dealer for any of my routine or warranty maintenance, as well as for aftermarket parts installment, for as long as there is a warranty on the truck. It may be a bit more expensive, but worth it when it comes to situations like this. They can’t argue that somebody else messed up the truck. Sorry to say, but like someone else already said, if you’re gonna play, you’re gonna pay.
Sometimes I think a heavy duty stamped steel unit might be better for off-road. ie a built in skid plate.Well yeah, but I figured I would give myself a bit of extra reassurance.