puckdodger
Well-Known Member
I was in a PHEV Volt just prior my Ranger and it was a phenomenal vehicle. Awesome fuel economy, gobs of torque, very quiet and fun to drive.
Sponsored
I'm pretty sure the 3.5l in the powerboost is the same as non powerboats version and it's a twin turbo.Are you saying twin turbo or twin scroll turbo? Big difference…
It’s his Polish side. It always wins.you already forgot about the Bronco roll out?
How do employers treat this come tax time? !099?as long as it's got 30-35 range on EV only and retains the current engine and then acts like a real hybrid while towing vs just enhanced HP and TQ ALA new tocoma I will trade up year 1 with 7year bumper to bumper. my comutte is 18 miles each day with access to to plugs at my work not to mention a L2 40amp already in my garage for my wife's Bolt EUV. I also tow quite a bit so this would be super helpful
You are correct, tow rating and payload rating will have to be decreased some just as they are for the Ranger Raptor.I would like a PHEV as much as the next person but literally concessions will need to be made....we're talking rangers here but also can lump Maverick into this discussion.
With regards to pickup trucks in general but as it pertains to "Power boost" hybrid (yes I know we're talking about PHEV's here) Battery packs weigh quite a bit...as a result payload and towing capacity drop off significantly.
Powerboost hybrid employs a fairly small battery which allows the F150 to maintain desirable payload and towing abilities.
Now if we take the Ranger and Maverick and assume a "Power boost" hybrid type of system (also add AWD to the Maverick) then payload and towing capacity should only be mildly affected and range probably increased (with obviously a heavier reliance on gasoline).....but if we start getting into plugin hybrids that means a significantly larger battery pack and I'd assume range would be greatly increased (range on EV alone even) but your payload will probably drop quite a bit from the current 7500lbs towing capacity and (avg payload rating around 1600/1700lbs for the RANGER)
Thats the trade off in considering a PHEV Ranger at least for me .....can I concede a drop in towing capacity and payload for lighter loads but increased driving range.
You are correct, tow rating and payload rating will have to be decreased some just as they are for the Ranger Raptor.
I get it, but tow rating involves a lot more than just HP and torque. The Raptor's tire size, suspension, heavier frame and likely numerous other issues all come into play just as many things will for a Ranger PHEV.For some 5500 is plenty enough...on the other hand you shell out that kind of money and you lose out 2000lbs even with having 100hp and 100ft+ lbs more torque
They sure willI get it, but tow rating involves a lot more than just HP and torque. The Raptor's tire size, suspension, heavier frame and likely numerous other issues all come into play just as many things will for a Ranger PHEV.
Of course not Chris. I didn't say it would go smoothly.you already forgot about the Bronco roll out?
Fix it for ya Al.It’s his Polish side.It always winsHe tends to forget easily.
I pay extra in my parking fees to get access. state jobHow do employers treat this come tax time? !099?
Or maybe they don't know that you gave yourself a raise.