Sponsored

Rear Ride height a Design defect caught tooo late?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cabose-1

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eli
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
1,982
Reaction score
7,472
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger XLT, 4x2, Advance Tow, E-Locker
Occupation
Student
Look, i leveled my truck again! Wood has been in the back of my ranger for 2 years now. I am 5,8, and the box is just too tall for me to reach in. So there it sits.

Screenshot_20220228-100748_Gallery.jpg
Sponsored

 

WingShot

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
377
Reaction score
1,234
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2021 XLT, Tremor, Cactus Gray
Occupation
Graphic Artist
I'm new here, wtf is going on?

So I'm clear - OP says his old truck (that he no longer owns) was too tall for him, so this must be a design flaw? huh?
Yeah, you got it! And 12 pages now discussing it (sorta).
 

Highlander

Well-Known Member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Threads
11
Messages
566
Reaction score
2,595
Location
Nova Scotia, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger Shadow Black Lariat 501A TREMOR
Occupation
Private
Vehicle Showcase
1
Please tell me most members aren’t like this ?
As rare as the design defect which started this thread... I think... I'm still pretty new here.

Frank
 


Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,539
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
No. No we're not. There a lot of good guys and gals here. Just a few negative Nancy's and a couple Ken's and Karen's. Lol
You have officially offended all damper people with that post!!

LOL
 

Friday yet?

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Threads
46
Messages
2,516
Reaction score
11,315
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
‘23 Lariat Tremor, Focus ST
Occupation
Corporate drone. Dilbert's world is alive & well.
As a Nissan guy myself I can say that the first few years of the D40 Frontier(2005-2021) had a bunch of issues. By 2012 I believe they had all the problems sorted out. I had a 2016 and i loved it. Only down side was it was a 2wd and I moved to the High Rockies of Colorado so it was only good for 5 months at best.
Sad part.... I absolutely loved that truck. But it was insane how much s*** broke on it. Both before and after warranty. The "after" is when it really got painful. Real painful. But, call me a dumb@$$, I loved that truck. Black. Man clean, that thing rocked!
 

Friday yet?

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Threads
46
Messages
2,516
Reaction score
11,315
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
‘23 Lariat Tremor, Focus ST
Occupation
Corporate drone. Dilbert's world is alive & well.

myothercarizahearse

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Threads
18
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
6,673
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger STX 4x4 w/ GFC V2, 1987 Caddy hearse
Occupation
Unretired
OMG! Every new vehicle I have bought in my life has been a Ford or Mercury. Except 1... a freaking '06 Frontier NISMO. (Don't hate.. I wanted a mid-size. At that time had we had 2 options, Tacos or Frontiers. ) What a POS. Spent more money on repairs, not maintenance, REPAIRS on that truck than on all of the rest of my vehicles combined. Wow. Your post brought back memories of a nightmare.
I have a long list of things that were fixed before I gave up and scrapped it at 93,000 miles. the bed falling off was the final straw. I probably spent as much on repairs as the truck itself
 

Cmar

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cam
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
1,874
Reaction score
5,178
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger PX
Occupation
Medical Scientist
Sad part.... I absolutely loved that truck. But it was insane how much s*** broke on it. Both before and after warranty. The "after" is when it really got painful. Real painful. But, call me a dumb@$$, I loved that truck. Black. Man clean, that thing rocked!
The Nissan D40 was the Australian version of that vehicle. They had so many problems, timing chains in the diesels, rod bearings, rust, poor paintwork, front diffs that collapsed, mis aligned chassis from new, common rail faults on the diesels, and last but not least the same model that was built in Spain and Thailand which looked the same, but was ever so slightly different so that parts and accessories bought for one you could never guarantee would fit the other. What a CF, it burned Nissan so badly in this country that they have never really ever recovered sales. And in one of the most pickup buying countries outside of the US that's not a good thing. Ford and Mitsubishi were happy to fill the market gap which opened. Toyota of course, kept on going with the Hilux and the prehistoric 70 series utes.
 

P. A. Schilke

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Threads
149
Messages
7,083
Reaction score
37,187
Location
GV Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
Occupation
Engineer Retired
Vehicle Showcase
1
So, in interest of full disclosure, I've sold my Ranger 6 mos ago for financial reasons, not because of this, though the rear bed height was a real PITA when loading and tying down.

After looking at the rear suspension design, while trying yo figure out a way to lower the rear suspension, I've come to suspect that the high rear ride height was a design flaw caught too late to correct. My reasoning follows from the fact that you can't really get any lowering height in any reasonable way. The frame points are too high, and the Truck is already slammed at the rear, but the rear is still too high. Ford even lowers the rear of the Truck on the "Build it" 'Net site to a normal level, like every other small truck on the market. Like the Tacoma i sold to buy it, and like the Nissan frontier i just picked up today, I can actual put both arms (I'm 6' with longish arms) in to the Bed from the side rear to tie something down. I could not without a uncomfortable strain with the Ranger. couldn't imagine trying if i was , say 5'8? So, looking at the fact that- -

1. It can't be corrected with the current Frame design

2. It's a flaw IMHO, wayyy too high. No reason for it

3. Even ford tries to hide the issue while selling the Truck

I believe that it was a design flaw that was caught too late to fix without a major rear frame redesigned, so Ford just put it into production.

And yes the Frontier is Awesome, but so was the Ranger, except for this major PITA flaw.

What to you think, agree or disagree and why?
Hi RDS,

Okay...I have remained silent on this post to let members "vent" etc... Did not read the entire thread due to a waste of time. So here is my take.

This IS NOT a design defect. If Ford produced a vehicle where something like this occurred, it would have not seen production without many design reviews. Since the 5G was produced off shore since 2016, there were redesigns of the Ranger for the North American market for power train and interior trim etc. The ride height was deemed acceptable for the frame design...tweaked for the 2.3l ten speed trans etc., but it was a decision to accept the tail up design was made. So throw the lemons you wish at the Ranger, but the design was not a mistake...

A bit of a back story....I had built 4 race trucks for racing at Livernois ( yep...the now tuners) Vehicle. The 4th truck was my test mule....the three race trucks were mulitlieaf rear springs.
I was looking to reduce weight and we developed a reduced weight monoleaf spring for the race trucks. The weight savings came at a cost so to speak as we had to retune the shocks, which we did many times during developments of the Test Mule and supplied to the team, Saleen Autosports. Multileafe design provides friction damping, but a monoleaf had no damping (like a tailgate damper, which is SO contentious). The weigh reduction was enough to merit bookshelfing the race truck technology for future productes....thus the 5g benefits from my work/development of racetrucks...

So lambast away... It was not considered a Defect...

Enough said...170 posts of mixed bag...

I saw the 5g in New Zealand in 2016...it was the No 1 selling vehicle in NZ and Australia.

When it hit the USA and being head of Ranger Vehicle Engineering, I just had to have one...trading my 2007 Ranger for a 2019...

5G is a worthy product and I am proud to be part of the heritage that delivered the Ranger back to market even though I had no direct input to this happening...

So I retreat to my flameproof bunker for my statements... Take them with a grain of salt or the whole saltshaker as you wish..

Best,
Phil
 

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,539
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
The Nissan D40 was the Australian version of that vehicle. They had so many problems, timing chains in the diesels, rod bearings, rust, poor paintwork, front diffs that collapsed, mis aligned chassis from new, common rail faults on the diesels, and last but not least the same model that was built in Spain and Thailand which looked the same, but was ever so slightly different so that parts and accessories bought for one you could never guarantee would fit the other. What a CF, it burned Nissan so badly in this country that they have never really ever recovered sales. And in one of the most pickup buying countries outside of the US that's not a good thing. Ford and Mitsubishi were happy to fill the market gap which opened. Toyota of course, kept on going with the Hilux and the prehistoric 70 series utes.
The D40 is the Designated Body/Chassis code for that vehicle. If not mistake it was called the Navara in every other part of the World with the exception of the US. Not sure why but it is what it is.
 

Cmar

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cam
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
1,874
Reaction score
5,178
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger PX
Occupation
Medical Scientist
The D40 is the Designated Body/Chassis code for that vehicle. If not mistake it was called the Navara in every other part of the World with the exception of the US. Not sure why but it is what it is.
No mistake, it was indeed called the Navara here. It was still a sh*t bucket. Such a shame it did have the makings of a great vehicle, good size, good looks, made by a company with (until then a good reputation for pickups and 4x4) but it's like they just threw QC and customer support out the window. Late in it's model life Nissan put the Renault A9x V6 diesel in it with the Z car 7 speed auto, that was actually quite a weapon, but sadly too little, to late, and too expensive at the time.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top