Thankfully the bed does not get removed for this. The instructions from ford show that it drops easily and if you were doing a fuel pump replacement it wouldn't take more than an hour and a half to do so.To be honest I'd be interested in simply a 26 gal tank (size I had in my old F150).
That would get me 600 miles on a tank with a bit to spare on the open road. I'd be happy with that.
BUT I must ask...would this involve removing the bed of the truck? If so then I'd probably just admire from afar.![]()
It's funny how you mention the test fit. When I say I'm working with the company I am going to be doing the test fit to make this possible for everyone but the down side is we are talking a few months out just to make that happen.Definitely interested. H3ll, I might even be willing to drive across America somewhere so they could use my truck to test fit the tank! (Not willing to drive to Australia since the alternator sits so low and might get wet for a sustained period of time)
On road distance would be great, but think about off-road mileage. Potentially one less thing to pack.
If you have the factory skid plates then you would most likely loose the fuel tank skid plate. Other than that you should be fine. If it is aftermarket skid plates then I honestly don't know.I could go for less stops at the gas station
Edit: Would this affect skid plate placements?
It all depends on how you look at it, if anything you would just stop at the gas station less a month so in your case once instead of twice but not everyone likes something new that comes out.I’m curious too, but with me averaging 700 miles a month it’d be a waste.
I am well aware of what you're mentioning here. Aftermarket fuel tanks that are bigger usually don't have skid plates to begin with. Also ARB already informed me they wont sell fuel tanks out here. And the company I'm goi g through at this time is similar to ARB where they use every nook and cranny to get the extra capacityits not the best picture, undercarriage photos seem rare online for the truck.
but this is what you're up against. everyone will want to maintain their ground clearance and skid plates.
ARB have a tank for the overseas model, it adds 60 litres I think, and it just looks like it makes use of every available nook and cranny around the current set up.
![]()
![]()
Hauling all that extra gas weight around hurts gas mileage and is just that much more wear and tear on the vehicle. Liquids are heavy, as anybody that carries a 5 gallon gas can can attest to.It all depends on how you look at it, if anything you would just stop at the gas station less a month so in your case once instead of twice but not everyone likes something new that comes out.
I am sure that the crash safety reasons are why a rear add on tank isnt a thing for the trucks here. Makes perfect sense to me. Would this be good for long trips? Sure, especially if you are towing then you dont have to worry about the lower MPG's for a while. It is definitely great for the offroad as well for the same reason. Is this for everyone? No but im still sure plenty would like the option.Crash safety probably has a lot to do with it. I'm willing to bet that is why we don't see duel tanks anymore either. And why tanks on trucks were moved from the back of the bed to the front (and inside the frame).
With health issues and age, I could not sit in the truck long enough to go through a larger tank of gas anymore like I could when I was younger.
Current sizes of fuel tanks on all vehicles pretty much have an average range of 300-350 miles per tank. I know that having a range of 300-350 miles per tank has always been a US military requirement for their vehicles and civilian vehicles seem to follow suit. I don't know who came up with that requirement first.
I can see the need in the Australian outback for a bigger than stock tank. I can see where people in parts of the western and southwestern US would too.