docarter
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #31
If it sells more trucks then I'm all for it of course. I guess I may be biased, the Ranger does much better off road than my ATS and the ATS is much more apt to handle high speeds and sharp corners.That would be a 3900 pound light truck which If lowered and a little more street tuned, would be a bit more accessible, and driveable . Your question really shows the unintentional bias. Oh, and I like a solid axle on a rear drive vehicle
I realize that it would never compete at Road America ,but it would sure be extra cool pulling a G-prod to the track.
I personally fail to see the point in offering an "off-road" tuned Ranger, but there are many folks who do find that it works well for them because they do "get" the point and the advantages.
Let's face it, a 4500 pound 4 door pickup tuned for off-road, still ain't no "dune buggy" either.
I actually drive and tow on the street and enjoy driving,
So to answer your question...here's an example of the point... ( much heavier than my SuperCab's 3960#) and the Ranger could be even cooler.
Sponsored