OFC Ranger
Well-Known Member
In most states if not all modifying commonly modified parts of your vehicle is illegal. Exhaust engine how far your tires are from the fender etc etcOh gee, how long is long enough for your approval?
When using a camera to try and "compare" light understand that your camera will be compensating for the average exposure of the scene (unless manually setting the exposure). As a result, the difference in scatter above a cutoff will be completely blown out by the main beam pattern below the cutoff. This is in part mostly due to the poor dynamic range of cameras vs the human eye (and when you have intense light angled downward, even 1/10 of that going into oncoming traffic is enough to daze/disorient).
Let's take a look at the argument.
On one side, we have forum users who want to get LEDs without spending money, and put chinese, no-name drop-ins for $20 (the alternative being replacement housings ranging from $500-200). On the other side of your "argument" you have industry experts. Which brings up another point - none of those drop-in LEDs are DOT certified.
Surely if the output profile of the drop-ins is equivalent to halogen it would be worth it to get certified (given the thousands of reviews). Where are the DOT approved drop-ins (and i'm not counting the no-name companies that just stamp "DOT approved")? Why haven't the big names in headlights gone through this little step and reaped massive profit? Swapping to the auxitos is illegal, so surely having the only legal option would pay off.
My biggest issue is you have people with no credentials arguing against the experts (and i don't proclaim to be one, but headlight experts have authored dozens of articles articulating this point better than I could), and Jim logs onto the forum and sees 40 pages of posts raving about how great those auxitos are.
Not exactly a sound argument.
Sponsored