17ish holes in the bed....awesome! Now it matches the rocker panel with a dozen or so holes. At least they kept the theme goingTried several searches but didn't find the answer.
I know the m8 holes near the wheel well are for the cost cuting move on the 3rd tiedown point. But what are all the other threaded holes and punchouts for?
Anything worthwhile to be added?
![]()
![]()
Guess only: could the rectangular hole be for a bed light? (Not sure who'd make a light only on one side though)Thanks for the info on both.
The set that has me particularly intrigued, mainly because it is on the driver side only, is the rectangular punchout and threaded hole at the top middle of the driverside wall.
Wolfhaus Offroad uses that hole for the 12v power, but I'm not sure what the factory intended. In general, the bed of the Ranger is the biggest disappointment when compared to the competition. There is zero innovation. Not even cutouts for some wood planks or anything. No track system. No factory 110v power, just plain disappointment.Thanks for the info on both.
The set that has me particularly intrigued, mainly because it is on the driver side only, is the rectangular punchout and threaded hole at the top middle of the driverside wall.
In Ford’s defense, the original concept of this truck: the Explorer SporTrac was a bit of a flop, and loaded with bed features. People weren’t ready for it yet , and scoffed at the tiny bed (and frankly I’m still upset this isn’t a 6’ bed with the SuperCrew). Though, the 5x5’ box has been surprisingly useful for home renovations and landscaping jobs, it leaves a lot to be desired as you say: (lack of) stake holes, tie downs, threaded holes, power options (120/15A or 20A, & 12v), lighting, easy connect topper lighting, wheel well size (given the lift), small rear window, gaps and holes that make sealing the bed difficult, etc. And they seriously cut costs by excluding tie downs and stake holes…Wolfhaus Offroad uses that hole for the 12v power, but I'm not sure what the factory intended. In general, the bed of the Ranger is the biggest disappointment when compared to the competition. There is zero innovation. Not even cutouts for some wood planks or anything. No track system. No factory 110v power, just plain disappointment.
I hated my sport Trac I had one brand new.In Ford’s defense, the original concept of this truck: the Explorer SporTrac was a bit of a flop, and loaded with bed features. People weren’t ready for it yet , and scoffed at the tiny bed (and frankly I’m still upset this isn’t a 6’ bed with the SuperCrew). Though, the 5x5’ box has been surprisingly useful for home renovations and landscaping jobs, it leaves a lot to be desired as you say: (lack of) stake holes, tie downs, threaded holes, power options (120/15A or 20A, & 12v), lighting, easy connect topper lighting, wheel well size (given the lift), small rear window, gaps and holes that make sealing the bed difficult, etc. And they seriously cut costs by excluding tie downs and stake holes…
I'm not sure I'd call the Explorer Sport Teak the original concept. Completely different chassis, drivetrain, suspension, interior, exterior. It was discontinued in 2010 after ten model years across two generations in an attempt to stop cannibalizing sales of the Ranger because the markets overlapped so much.In Ford’s defense, the original concept of this truck: the Explorer SporTrac was a bit of a flop, and loaded with bed features. People weren’t ready for it yet , and scoffed at the tiny bed (and frankly I’m still upset this isn’t a 6’ bed with the SuperCrew). Though, the 5x5’ box has been surprisingly useful for home renovations and landscaping jobs, it leaves a lot to be desired as you say: (lack of) stake holes, tie downs, threaded holes, power options (120/15A or 20A, & 12v), lighting, easy connect topper lighting, wheel well size (given the lift), small rear window, gaps and holes that make sealing the bed difficult, etc. And they seriously cut costs by excluding tie downs and stake holes…