Cold Air Intake Comparisons?

RCMUSTANG

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ray
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
1,795
Reaction score
1,952
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2017 Fusion 1995 Ranger
I prefer the design where the inlet is at the bottom so if water does get in it's not shooting directly at the air filter. When I will be offroad I run a pre-filter to keep any super fine dust out and it's hydrophobic too.
Sponsored

 

port43

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,949
Location
Detroit Suburb
Website
childrescuecoalition.org
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger STX FX4, 2017 Lincoln MKX, 2008 Harley XL 1200N, 1972 Pontiac LeMans Convertible
Occupation
Secret agent, man

RangerFitz

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
140
Reaction score
346
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2020 fx2
Occupation
Danger
Got the AirRaid installed tonight! I'm impressed with the quality, but its kind of rough around the edges. A few of the holes has burrs around the edges so bolts couldn't go all the way through. The scoop/inlet has a little extra material around the lip, almost looks like a leftover from a 3d printing process. I could definitely open the mouth a bit more with a dremel. Overall I am very pleased and the design is awesome including the velocity stack! I also have never had a company provide a dyno before which is cool. The 8 hp gain is great, but the 19tq gain @ 3300rpm has my attention!! It would be really cool to see the dyno graph of the k&n intake if they provide it. Ill take some videos and more pictures later and make a full post/review. One more thing, im not excited when it comes time to clean the filter there will be a fair amount of disassembly!

20210126_185648.jpg


20210126_171521.jpg
 

RangerFitz

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
140
Reaction score
346
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2020 fx2
Occupation
Danger
Found the k&n intake dyno for comparison.

FB_IMG_1611710471226.jpg
 

Bsenecal

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
May 21, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
579
Reaction score
1,565
Location
Milton Vermont
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Supercrew, 2017 Ford Fusion Sport, 1968 Ford Mustang
Occupation
Military


RangerFitz

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
140
Reaction score
346
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2020 fx2
Occupation
Danger
I wonder why the K&N makes 6 plus more hours? The torque numbers are similar.
Brian
Assuming its not just because it was a different day, variation in the dyno, or the superior flow of that sweet-sweet k&n filter... I think there is a little extra material around the inlet mouth on the airaid compared to the K&N. I'm curious if I opened it up with a dremel if it might help it flow better up top ?
 
Last edited:

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
384
Reaction score
712
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
Assuming its not just because it was a different day, variation in the dyno, or the superior flow of that sweet-sweet k&n filter... I think there is a little extra material around the inlet mouth on the airaid compared to the K&N. I'm curious if I opened it up with a dremel if it might help it flow better up top ?
Do it! Should be easy to remove and can only help...
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
384
Reaction score
712
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
Just found this:

https://www.aftermarketnews.com/kn-engineering-buys-airaid/

So looks like in this case the Airaid intake is a cheaper to make option of the K&N intake sharing design similarities. Upon examining the instructions for both there are differences like the snorkel of the K&N needing to be bolted on due to design vs the molded in snorkel on the Airaid. Also the hard injection molded intake elbow on the K&N vs the silicone elbow on the Airaid.

As far as the HP differences, I’m sure the traditional K&N element flows more than the dry element of the Airaid, the inlet on the K&N snorkel looks to be taller to allow more airflow, and the airbox itself of the K&N has more volume in looking at the pictures too.

I would compare this to the Airaid being the Toyota option while the K&N is the Lexus option. Both get the job done, one being more refined than the other and in this case that means some extra ponies for $50 more due to some more refined design.
 
Last edited:

TORQUERULES

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Threads
30
Messages
755
Reaction score
1,125
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ranger
For $50 more the K&N looks worth it, plus I have used their intakes in the past and they work well. The bellmouth/velocity stack they bolt their filter to really helps with flow.

Compared to the Airaid the K&N looks to have a larger volume box, a better designed snorkel, and the oiled filter will flow more. The Airaid is a more reasonable price though. Cold air intakes and catbacks have become ridiculously expensive in the last 10 years.
 

Big Blue

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
May 5, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
3,168
Reaction score
7,084
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT FX4 Supercrew lighting blue
Occupation
Retired mechanical designer
No horse in this race! I find it interesting that K&Ns baseline run is significantly lower than AiraIds. Makes K&Ns gains look better. Also does it strike anyone that both vehicles are 2019 with 2100 miles? And, both graphs are formated exactly the same .

In my opinion the gains with a CAI, anybodys, are minimal except maybe bragging rights. Maybe with significant other performance modifications, pipes, exhaust, intercooler, tune, ect. It would be hard to qualify what actual gains came from what. At least not without extensive testing.

IMHO, buy the one you like and makes you feel the best. Difference in performance gains per dollar less than minimal.
 

TORQUERULES

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Threads
30
Messages
755
Reaction score
1,125
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ranger
No horse in this race! I find it interesting that K&Ns baseline run is significantly lower than AiraIds. Makes K&Ns gains look better. Also does it strike anyone that both vehicles are 2019 with 2100 miles? And, both graphs are formated exactly the same .

In my opinion the gains with a CAI, anybodys, are minimal except maybe bragging rights. Maybe with significant other performance modifications, pipes, exhaust, intercooler, tune, ect. It would be hard to qualify what actual gains came from what. At least not without extensive testing.

IMHO, buy the one you like and makes you feel the best. Difference in performance gains per dollar less than minimal.

True. I think they all give about the same gains, plus or minus a couple HP/TQ here or there, so it is just a question of which design you like and the cost. Honestly, like you said, the conditions are optimized for these advertised HP/TQ gains and they often cherry-pick parts of the dyno graph that show the best gains. Tuners do this too, that is why I like to look at customer testimonials and dyno runs first.

These things are way too damn expensive for what they are IMHO.

I'd love to see a dyno with just a filter change in the stock box. Would be interesting.
 

Big Blue

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
May 5, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
3,168
Reaction score
7,084
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT FX4 Supercrew lighting blue
Occupation
Retired mechanical designer
True. I think they all give about the same gains, plus or minus a couple HP/TQ here or there, so it is just a question of which design you like and the cost. Honestly, like you said, the conditions are optimized for these advertised HP/TQ gains and they often cherry-pick parts of the dyno graph that show the best gains. Tuners do this too, that is why I like to look at customer testimonials and dyno runs first.

These things are way too damn expensive for what they are IMHO.

I'd love to see a dyno with just a filter change in the stock box. Would be interesting.
Probably still a tight horse race on a stock truck. There are way more restrictive parts of the intake/exhaust path than the stock filter box.
 

TORQUERULES

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Threads
30
Messages
755
Reaction score
1,125
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ranger
Probably still a tight horse race on a stock truck. There are way more restrictive parts of the intake/exhaust path than the stock filter box.
I wish someone would make a replacement for the turbo inlet pipe (not the charge pipe, although the turbo side on those is restrictive as well). That inlet pipe is a piece of s**t. On my Mazdaspeed I gained a lot from a better inlet pipe, even stock sized. It is now a 4" pipe, but even stock sized it really helped.
 

RangerFitz

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
140
Reaction score
346
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2020 fx2
Occupation
Danger
FYI the airaid does offer Dry and oiled filter options. It does look like the K&n baseline dyno is a little lower than the airaids. Looking at the pictures and formating they used the same test vehicle for both intakes. I likely would have went with the K&N if it were ever in stock!
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
384
Reaction score
712
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
FYI the airaid does offer Dry and oiled filter options. It does look like the K&n baseline dyno is a little lower than the airaids. Looking at the pictures and formating they used the same test vehicle for both intakes. I likely would have went with the K&N if it were ever in stock!
I think you made a solid purchase. I emailed K&N and their intake is supposed to be ready to ship on 2/6.
Sponsored

 
 



Top