rangerdanger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2018
- Threads
- 194
- Messages
- 3,489
- Reaction score
- 2,635
- Location
- SF Bay Area
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Ford Ranger SuperCrew XLT FX4
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
Sponsored
I agree 100%. Fuel economy definitely depends on driving conditions and the way you drive the vehicle. I get way better fuel economy with my F-150 on the back roads going to the Gulf each weekend where the speed limit is 55mph versus the interstate where everyone is going 70-75mph.Well, he says he liked the truck and this his complaints are nit picky (which they are). And that Ford was taking care of issues.
Interesting thing was he got 22.5 from Washington to California - that isn't bad - there is a LOT of big hills in Southern Oregon and Northern California you have to go thru. So that seemed pretty good. Also interesting to note when it was flatter and he was driving slower his mileage went up. That would be consistent with mileage tanking when you use the turbo too much. He said he got 25.5 in California driving 65 (where it was flatter).
So even though it isn't the most exiting "review", it had some interesting data points I think.
My current Ranger doesn't seem to care too much - not matter what or how I drive, it seems to get about 18 - I guess if I do straight highway with the cruise on, a couple times it flirted with 20 mpg, but that is really unusual. In normal driving - whether around town or mixed highway/town driving, it just seems to get about 18. I think from the factory it was supposed to be 17-19, so I guess I should be happy. I guess these smaller engines are a little more variable with the MPG.I agree 100%. Fuel economy definitely depends on driving conditions and the way you drive the vehicle. I get way better fuel economy with my F-150 on the back roads going to the Gulf each weekend where the speed limit is 55mph versus the interstate where everyone is going 70-75mph.
Watching this last review had an angle of the motor. Is the fan really exposed that much? Is that typical? Seems pretty dangerous.
Yes it’s exposed that much from behind, but it does have a cover for the top & front.Watching this last review had an angle of the motor. Is the fan really exposed that much? Is that typical? Seems pretty dangerous.
There is a post somewhere in this threadHas a single one of these "journalists" given any instrumented data yet? Actual 1/4 mile times, braking, etc....