Psykostevo
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2019
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 335
- Location
- Queen Creek, AZ
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Ford Ranger
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
- Thread starter
- #1
Post #1:
+THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, YOU MODIFY YOUR OWN VEHICLE AT YOUR OWN RISK USING YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT+
In stock form the Ranger has a higher Driver Demanded Torque value than the 2.3L Mustang Ecoboost, which I found interesting since on paper the Ranger is rated at a substantially lower HP and Torque output. This may be due to the 270/310 rating being established at 87 Octane instead of 91+ Octane. If there are factors such as knock/pinging present due to lower quality gasoline being used, the value for Driver Demanded Torque will be reduced.
Values represented on both tables are in lb/ft, but the column and axis values are different between the two. The Mustang show the 90+ Throttle position to be on the far right of the table, whereas the Ranger shows the 90+ Throttle position to be on the bottom.
The 2017 Ford Mustang is rated at 310hp and 320tq at the crank, and the Driver Demand table very closely dictates that (as it should since it is used in calculations to establish the ECU's desire to increase or decrease load on the engine to moderate power production).
The Ranger on the other hand has it's values set to establish that in absence of an prohibitors, it should be able to produce 340 lb/ft of Torque (30 more than it's advertised rating), and if we look at the torque output demanded at or near peak power level (5,500rpm) we see a torque value of 317 which would mean that in a PERFECT world with no detractors that would equate to (317*5500)/5252 = 331hp.
Stock Ranger Driver Demand table:
Stock 2017 Mustang Ecoboost Driver Demand Table:
+THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, YOU MODIFY YOUR OWN VEHICLE AT YOUR OWN RISK USING YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT+
In stock form the Ranger has a higher Driver Demanded Torque value than the 2.3L Mustang Ecoboost, which I found interesting since on paper the Ranger is rated at a substantially lower HP and Torque output. This may be due to the 270/310 rating being established at 87 Octane instead of 91+ Octane. If there are factors such as knock/pinging present due to lower quality gasoline being used, the value for Driver Demanded Torque will be reduced.
Values represented on both tables are in lb/ft, but the column and axis values are different between the two. The Mustang show the 90+ Throttle position to be on the far right of the table, whereas the Ranger shows the 90+ Throttle position to be on the bottom.
The 2017 Ford Mustang is rated at 310hp and 320tq at the crank, and the Driver Demand table very closely dictates that (as it should since it is used in calculations to establish the ECU's desire to increase or decrease load on the engine to moderate power production).
The Ranger on the other hand has it's values set to establish that in absence of an prohibitors, it should be able to produce 340 lb/ft of Torque (30 more than it's advertised rating), and if we look at the torque output demanded at or near peak power level (5,500rpm) we see a torque value of 317 which would mean that in a PERFECT world with no detractors that would equate to (317*5500)/5252 = 331hp.
Stock Ranger Driver Demand table:
Stock 2017 Mustang Ecoboost Driver Demand Table:
Sponsored
Last edited: