Doc
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Doc
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
- Threads
- 94
- Messages
- 5,764
- Reaction score
- 23,216
- Location
- Live oak fla
- Vehicle(s)
- 2026 5.0 Mustang GT, 2024 Ranger STX
- Occupation
- Retired
Sponsored
Ha ha, I've never had a problem with traditional mouse traps and they're cheap. Thanks for the encrypted responseJust a week ago I bought 2 of these and already have caught 4 chipmunks, no comparison to what my catch can has managed in a year or so, and the motel mouse was just $19.95 vs $225 for the UPR catch can, save your money and buy something that actually works.
![]()
I've had no issues with the UPR hardware, however it was a pain to install and the only time the can had much in it was a late winter trip from Pagosa to Denver where it was rain and snow for both legs of the trip, in dry conditions there is only a few ounces in the can. I will say the UPR hoses are continental and appear to be up to the task.Ha ha, I've never had a problem with traditional mouse traps and they're cheap. Thanks for the encrypted response
"had much in it". That is past tense. So, it sounds like you don't find them useful even though it's capturing something.I've had no issues with the UPR hardware, however it was a pain to install and the only time the can had much in it was a late winter trip from Pagosa to Denver where it was rain and snow for both legs of the trip, in dry conditions there is only a few ounces in the can. I will say the UPR hoses are continental and appear to be up to the task.
Found them btw..After 802 posts the answer is still no.
Especially now that everybody is having problems with the catch can hoses.
The consensus on the other forums I am on is that the UPR catch cans are one of the very best you can get.Have the people of this forum come to a concensus on what is the best oil catch can and easiest to use?
Since I have them installed on 2 of my vehicles it would be easy to say "the're great" in the early days of gdi there were stories of bmw for one needing walnut blasting, you don't hear that much anymore, there have been improvements in gdi - less soot, etc. And the Ranger has an oil separator that appears to work well. Know a mechanic who has seen a number of intake valves on higher mileage (100k +) gdi engines and they do have hardened deposits on the intakes but he hasn't seen that having much impact on the engine operation . So perhaps useful, perhaps a waste of $200+ ."had much in it". That is past tense. So, it sounds like you don't find them useful even though it's capturing something.
Well that's an RS so I guess running premium won't fix it. Is there some kind of additive that can be used to clean the valves? Walnut blasting every 45k is ridiculous.
Don't want to stir the pot but I find this interesting. A '18 2.3 with just a little more than 45k miles on it needs intake valve cleaning already and supposedly there's 2 catch cans hooked up to the motor
Who knows what the story is, was it getting fed with a steady diet of a quality gas?
Was the owner up on his/her oil changes?
Did the owner install the catch cans late in the game- even though that's fairly low miles.
I don't plan on putting one in mine