Sponsored

Worse m.p.g. Using higher octane

Racket

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
2,204
Reaction score
3,404
Location
Here and There
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat Supercrew 2WD
Occupation
Transient
I've not seen 86 octane - is it sold at high altitude?

As far as ethanol percentage I believe the 94 octane E30 at Sunoco gave me as good mileage as the up-to 10% ethanol 93 octane at Sam's club. The minimum I run is 89 octane - which is what the tune Torrie at Unleashed built for me.

I get mid 24 MPG on the highway - would probably do better at sub-70 MPH.

The only ethanol free gas I find is 87 octane and it costs near as much as premium.
Sponsored

 

ScrappyLaptop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scrappy
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
242
Reaction score
547
Location
SF Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger XLT SuperCrew 2x4
Occupation
IT
I think it depends on how the 91 octane is formulated. If they do it partially or totally with additional ethanol, milage could be worse than that using E-0 non-oxy premium. I only ran two tanks of 91 oct E-0, and that was when the truck had less than a thousand miles, and we were in the Black Hills. Later drove home against the wind at 80mph, so I don't have a fair comparison with 87oct E-10.
I have never reset the Fuel economy page in the Driver Information Display since news after 5167 miles I've averaged 24.4 mpg and 49 mph all but those two tanks mentioned earlier on 87oct E10
You may have something there. Ethanol has about 10% less energy than gasoline, so the portion of the fuel that is ethanol will get 10% less mpg. Ethanol itself has an octane rating of 118. The octane rating for E15 (15% ethanol) is 88 octane and E85 (85% ethanol) is 108 octane.

It would be somewhat ironic if gas stations are providing the higher octane fuel required by more fuel efficient engines, but because they're using ethanol to get that higher octane rating, the fuel results in lower miles per gallon.
 

Porpoise Hork

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bret
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
2,366
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2022 F150 XLT Powerboost FX4 302A Oxford White
Occupation
IT
Is it possible? I usually use 86 octane,friday I was down to half a tank and filled up with 88 octane (philips 66),I can usually go 100 miles before it gets to 3/4 of a tank,right now I’m at 78 miles already at 3/4 of a tank
Sometimes you can get a tank of bad gas. Oh it'll run OK but the mileage will be utter crap. Other times it could just be the pump auto cut-off stopped early and the tank wasn't as full as you think it actually was causing the difference.
 

ScrappyLaptop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scrappy
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
242
Reaction score
547
Location
SF Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger XLT SuperCrew 2x4
Occupation
IT
Yes it's possible. Depending on what your station is using to boost octane, it's very possible for higher octane to have a lower stoich point and require more fuel.
Not to get too far OT, but...
The official reason for the ethanol is to create less emissions.
Yet burning ethanol itself creates CO2.
And blending it in lowers gasoline's miles per gallon, thus creating more emissions.
At some point it starts to feel a bit like a corn growers' lobby shell game.
 


dondonbabyraptor

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Threads
41
Messages
2,194
Reaction score
6,249
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger Lariat
Occupation
I/O Psych MSc student
Better than my 15 MPG. I think there are way too many factors to consider to get too crazy over it. Gasoline changes, varying gases at different stations, varying ethanol, varying driving habit changes(even unconsciously), computer MPG being not accurate to the highest degree, more highway vs street or more street vs highway during certain weeks, that one time you decided to drive harder to reach your destination, that one time you decided you were tired and wanted a relaxing drive near or under speed limit, etc etc. You get my point, enjoy the Ranger and forget about the little nuances :rockon:
 

t4thfavor

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chance
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
2,607
Reaction score
2,357
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT FX4 Fox 2.0, 2011 Ford Edge Sport
Over a fairly long period of time I have been getting 8-10 mpg using 87 octane pure gasoline and 10-11 mpg using 93 octane pure gasoline while towing my camper. I attribute this to less knock under load requiring less fuel to compensate for.
 

Motorpsychology

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
11,491
Location
Prescott, WI
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ranger STX SuperCab 4X4 Carbonized grey; 2025 Mazda CX-90 Platinum Quartz
Occupation
Vagabond
In Florida our regular octane is 87. I have occasionally seen 88 offered alongside it (and wondered why). Someone told me the 88 contains more ethanol than the 87, which could explain lower efficiency/mpg despite the higher octane.
Look at the pump carefully, most 88-89 octane is E-15 around here. The selector on the pump should be labelled as such. The label is there to warn of damage to small engines, motorcycles, boat motors, etc.
Unknown.png
 

BlackRanger01

Well-Known Member
First Name
Larry
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
224
Reaction score
423
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger Lariat Super Cab 4x4
Occupation
IT
I've not seen 86 octane - is it sold at high altitude?

As far as ethanol percentage I believe the 94 octane E30 at Sunoco gave me as good mileage as the up-to 10% ethanol 93 octane at Sam's club. The minimum I run is 89 octane - which is what the tune Torrie at Unleashed built for me.

I get mid 24 MPG on the highway - would probably do better at sub-70 MPH.

The only ethanol free gas I find is 87 octane and it costs near as much as premium.
Had 85 octane in Montana in 90s. Had it in old escort and didn't have an issue.
 

Apples

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alan
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
687
Reaction score
1,318
Location
Roswell, NM
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT
Occupation
Retired
Pure octane isn't the only issue. The Reid Vapor pressure rating is changed based on the local ambient. Thus individual ratings from one to another supplier is to be assumed.
 

JohnnyO

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jon
Joined
Apr 8, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
1,969
Reaction score
6,143
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger STX 4x4
Occupation
Asst. Greenskeeper, Bushwood Country Club
You can't make a judgement from one tank. Need to run 3 to 5 tanks consecutively to see if it makes a difference.

Could the 88 Octane have more ethanol in it?

And it usually take 2-3 tanks full to see a change with different octane rules are used. And since you only put half a tank in, it is possible that you got some bad fuel.
I run E15 88 octane a little more than half the time and see no mpg difference between that and regular 87. Stickers on the pumps around here say that 87 may have up to 10% ethanol and the E15 may have up to 15%. I have a credit card for a regional convenience store chain and some locations have E15 and some don't. I'll save the 10-20 cents a gallon when I can.
 

12Bravo20

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Threads
4
Messages
444
Reaction score
1,141
Location
Missouri
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XLT FX4
Occupation
retired
Around me, the choices are 87, 89, 91, or 93 octane. And most of it contains up to 10% ethanol unless you somewhere that carries 91 or 93 ethanol free gas. I've been running either 91 or 93 in my Ranger since new. Not all stations have 91 and 93, it is one or the other.
 
Last edited:

CB750F

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Threads
28
Messages
1,076
Reaction score
3,389
Location
Qc
Vehicle(s)
Subaru BRZ / SCAB Ranger XLT/FX4 & various motos
Occupation
Human
OMG, not this again.
OP, your talking about 1/4 tank of gas, that's nothing, try 5 tanks & see
what it does.
Please google "What is octane"
First thing that comes up is:
" Octane ratings are measures of fuel stability. These ratings are based on the pressure at which a fuel will spontaneously combust (auto-ignite) "

So, a low octane will pre-detonate in a high compression engine & will
cause what is known as pinging or knocking. This means as the piston
goes up it is compressing the gas & air & will go BOOM before the
spark plug goes on. This will cause stress on the piston, as it is still
going up & unfortunately will cause stress on all the parts below the piston. ( This is just, bad!)
Someone mentioned an NA (natural aspired) as opposed to FI (forced induction) turbo/supper charger will use 87. Not true, low compression engine will use lower octane & high compression will use a higher octane.
My BRZ is NA, high compression 12:1, I need 91 or more. Ranger can use 87,
with a turbo engine, as it has a compression ratio of 10:1(low).
The only thing higher octane may/does(?) have is better detergents.
The day I tow, I will use 91, till then, 87 it is, as per FoMoCo & their
documentation with the book provided with our trucks.
Edit - Oups, my bad, seem u can get 30 more hp with higher octane....
So a little more power & better detergent with higher octane.

I ain't no scientist nor do I think I know WTF I'm talking about, just a dude
on the internet, believe with caution.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Josebd

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Threads
30
Messages
229
Reaction score
281
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford ranger xlt
Occupation
Road maintenance county
Filled up this morning with 88 octane,haven’t found 87 yet,made a short trip to a close little city,came back home,84 miles round trip,yes I know that ain’t crap,I know I should go further,but don’t plan to anytime soon,I don’t use it for work,I have company pickup
and it did pretty darn good,a lot better than the stop and go that I did before this fill up,so I guess I was just being a little paranoid,only got a little over 2000 miles on it total,maybe the 86 octane didn’t hurt it any? I learned my lesson guys so be gentle
after the little trip lol
A55FBDC9-B303-4BE2-AD68-9294125C6C22.jpeg
 
Last edited:

D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
OMG, not this again.
OP, your talking about 1/4 tank of gas, that's nothing, try 5 tanks & see
what it does.
Please google "What is octane"
First thing that comes up is:
" Octane ratings are measures of fuel stability. These ratings are based on the pressure at which a fuel will spontaneously combust (auto-ignite) "

So, a low octane will pre-detonate in a high compression engine & will
cause what is known as pinging or knocking. This means as the piston
goes up it is compressing the gas & air & will go BOOM before the
spark plug goes on. This will cause stress on the piston, as it is still
going up & unfortunately will cause stress on all the parts below the piston. ( This is just, bad!)
Someone mentioned an NA (natural aspired) as opposed to FI (forced induction) turbo/supper charger will use 87. Not true, low compression engine will use lower octane & high compression will use a higher octane.
My BRZ is NA, high compression 12:1, I need 91 or more. Ranger can use 87,
with a turbo engine, as it has a compression ratio of 10:1(low).
The only thing higher octane may/does(?) have is better detergents.
The day I tow, I will use 91, till then, 87 it is, as per FoMoCo & their
documentation with the book provided with our trucks.
Edit - Oups, my bad, seem u can get 30 more hp with higher octane....
So a little more power & better detergent with higher octane.

I ain't no scientist nor do I think I know WTF I'm talking about, just a dude
on the internet, believe with caution.
Very few NA engines have a high enough compression ratio to require higher octane fuels. Unless you're talking about motorcycles.

And no midsize trucks in the US market with NA engines are one of them.

Perhaps I should've said, "if you want to put cheap gas in your midsized truck you should've bought one with a NA engine."

Putting 87 in a small displacement turbo engine is not a good idea. No matter what Ford says.
Sponsored

 
 








Top