egilbe
Well-Known Member
Stupid video couldn't even get the generation rightThus is probably the nicest review from another auto maker you will ever see! ?
Sponsored
Stupid video couldn't even get the generation rightThus is probably the nicest review from another auto maker you will ever see! ?
Every single time I get on the highway, and with the blow off valve it's like an extra f you.That’s funny, now that I’ve been driving this Ranger a little while it’s all the taco owners are rubbernecking my truck and not the other way around. It’s even better when one tries to blow you off and what they end up seeing is my LED taillights dimming as the gap widens!
IF THIS ISNT THE SAME AS ME. Ahahahahhahahaa. I compared the two, liked the ranger more (Tacoma has always been ugly to me), and also I wanted something for offroad that no one else had. And to this day, I have seen so many Tacoma's, but not a single new gen ranger offroad (besides online).I just shopped the two against each other. Ended up with a Lariat FX4.
It wasn't even a tough call to make. The Ranger just seemed like a better truck (to me) across the board. I mean, I liked the Tac's bed options and amenities that aren't really available to us.... other than that the Ranger was just so much cooler.
I'll admit, I also tend to be automatically disinterested by "what everyone else is doing" so that bias may be seeping in here.
I was in the car business for over 30 years. In the 80's when the Ranger came out the under 30 crowd came into the showrooms to see them but wouldn't buy one because "A Ford is something my parents would buy and I don't want to own anything they would buy." And the Ranger was a better value.I've been looking at small pickups for off-roading and I see that other than the new Jeep Gladiator all of the other ones are Toyota Tacomas. I'm wondering if there is a particular reason for this? It appears that the Ford Ranger and Chevrolet Colorado are almost identical to the Toyota Tacoma, why not use these instead? AEV even has an excellent build for the Chevrolet Colorado:
https://www.aev-conversions.com/vehicles/zr2-bison/.
I'm sure there are also some nice builds similar to this for the Ranger?
Yup they need to completely replace the drivetrain.Tacoma was never in the running. The seating position for someone my height is an absolute deal breaker.
Now that I own the Ranger, even if they somehow fixed the seating problem, they are too far behind on many other important factors to be considered in a straight up comparison.
For the last 5+ years Tacomas may sell at MSRP, but are still overpriced as if you used the factory loan programs you paid a minimum of 4%. when my bank was offering 2%.I cross shopped Tacomas for about 10 minutes when looking for a truck. The cost was considerably higher than a comparable Ranger, so they were immediately eliminated. I knew the Ranger was a better truck, and I have been a Ford truck fan since day 1 so the choice was easy. In the mountains, Tacomas are priced higher because of high demand. We call it the taco tax. You can't even get a new one without getting ripped off. The used ones are a joke, it is not uncommon to see nearly 20yo trucks with nearly 200k miles being listed for 10k+. People pay extra for the "reliability" when at that point it is really about how the vehicle was maintained over the last 200k.
Don't forget you're also buying Toyota Care in the price of the vehicle. Just because they don't make it a line item doesn't mean it's free.For the last 5+ years Tacomas may sell at MSRP, but are still overpriced as if you used the factory loan programs you paid a minimum of 4%. when my bank was offering 2%.
it always amazed me that a truck so behind the tech, curve was selling above market rates.
Now that is a feature.