Did you get around with the installation? Id like to do this too if it workedWondering if anyone has bitten the bullet and tried the Sync USB hub replacement yet? I may give it a go soon.
USB A is sometimes not enough to actually charge a phone while its being used for other things like Android Auto / CarPlay. USB C, assuming Ford did it right, can fast chargeThis remains one of the biggest first world problems I've seen on the site.A USB A->C cable has been plugged into my truck since the first day it came home.
There are no power guarantees for "usb-c" either--all it is, is a differently shaped plug. If you really mean "usb-pd", you aren't going to get that with a simple form factor swap. (Again, the fact that you can't run multiple high draw devices on the existing usb ports has nothing to do with the plug shape--it's perfectly possible to have higher powered usb-a ports, Ford just didn't implement that.)USB A is sometimes not enough to actually charge a phone while its being used for other things like Android Auto / CarPlay. USB C, assuming Ford did it right, can fast charge
usb-c will almost certainly be the norm in the future with or without the EU, which still has nothing to do with the ports in a gen 5 ranger.If the EU charger mandate goes through USB-C will be the norm in the future.
Just changing the port to USB-C does not mean it will provide more power. If the power from USB hub ports is dependent on the power provided from the APIM over the USB cable swapping the HUB will likely not result in an more power output since the USB connections between the APIM and hub are pre-USB-C standards. But, I do see on the Sync with touchscreen (I'm not sure Sync without Touch was an option here, but is in the electrical diagrams book for the Ranger) there is a power and ground from the APIM to the USB hub (Connector C2809A) run about parallel to the USB cable, not sure its purpose or the power it can provide. But there is a chance that it can be for providing additional power to the hub for connected devices and maybe a USB-C would also provide more power. Or, maybe it's just for illumination.USB A is sometimes not enough to actually charge a phone while its being used for other things like Android Auto / CarPlay. USB C, assuming Ford did it right, can fast charge
I'm referring to USB-PD. I haven't checked to see if the hub includes more than a simple A to C change. Are you saying that you have verified that that's all they've done?There are no power guarantees for "usb-c" either--all it is, is a differently shaped plug. If you really mean "usb-pd", you aren't going to get that with a simple form factor swap. (Again, the fact that you can't run multiple high draw devices on the existing usb ports has nothing to do with the plug shape--it's perfectly possible to have higher powered usb-a ports, Ford just didn't implement that.)
I haven't seen any reports that the module provides USB-PD, and I don't see why Ford would have a run a high-wattage circuit to a location where they weren't planning to use it. I've seen some third party modules that pull in additional power but the reports on those were sketchy. I've also seen some people report that they got fast charge on the ford module when most people reported that they did not. I've seen no reports that describe the specific technical capabilities of any of the parts, or schematics explaining the power requirements, etc. One thing to note is that "fast charge" isn't a specific thing, and different phones have different requirements. Some phones will also start out saying "fast charge" then realize they aren't getting enough power and drop down. Unless someone specifies the standards and voltages the module supports* all the talk about "usb-c" and "fast charge" is just a waste of words.I'm referring to USB-PD. I haven't checked to see if the hub includes more than a simple A to C change. Are you saying that you have verified that that's all they've done?
I know all of this and was simply stating that it's not just about the shape of the plug to some of us. If I were ready to replace mine then I would do the research to see if Ford's providing USB-PD and which voltages and whatnot. I don't know. It doesn't sound like you know. So why the tone? It doesn't change what people want. One of the reasons for wanting USB-C is faster charging. Does Ford actually provide that? Probably not. But it's still a reason for wanting it.I haven't seen any reports that the module provides USB-PD, and I don't see why Ford would have a run a high-wattage circuit to a location where they weren't planning to use it. I've seen some third party modules that pull in additional power but the reports on those were sketchy. I've also seen some people report that they got fast charge on the ford module when most people reported that they did not. I've seen no reports that describe the specific technical capabilities of any of the parts, or schematics explaining the power requirements, etc. One thing to note is that "fast charge" isn't a specific thing, and different phones have different requirements. Some phones will also start out saying "fast charge" then realize they aren't getting enough power and drop down. Unless someone specifies the standards and voltages the module supports* all the talk about "usb-c" and "fast charge" is just a waste of words.
* USB-PD has standards for anything from 5V to 48V, and from .5A to 5A. Different phones have different requirements. Some phones might be able to fast charge if the port only provides 5V power, some might require 9V or 15V power to fast charge. The utter lack of documentation is typical of automobile manufacturers, they really just aren't interested in dealing with consumer electronics.
Then it's best to specify what the actual requirement is, that's more likely to generate useful answers.I know all of this and was simply stating that it's not just about the shape of the plug to some of us.