Swishpapasweets
Well-Known Member
Unlike the taco i could swap the 2.3 for the 2.7 for a huge boost of power. Also i like being different
To each their own I guess. If I have a fully loaded Tacoma vs a fully loaded Ranger at the same price, I pick the Ranger every time. I still don't understand that when one vehicle has a better engine, transmission, payload AND more comfortable to sit in that you conclude that you settled for the lesser of the two....Ford has a number of "best in class" qualities, you're right. And I got mine for about $10K less than a comparable Tacoma. But it took $10K less to get me to buy the Ford. That's a lot of loss for Ford...
Until you try and go up a hill........and it's shifts over and over and doesn't go anywhere anyway.I checked out the Toyota. I liked it a lot. I only wanted the TRD Pro. The dealers wanted $50K for a M/T. That's excessive. Other than the awkward seating position, the Tacoma is almost universally a superior truck.
So building a truck with best in class features for less money is a negative in your opinion? That used to be what Toyota was known for.Ford has a number of "best in class" qualities, you're right. And I got mine for about $10K less than a comparable Tacoma. But it took $10K less to get me to buy the Ford. That's a lot of loss for Ford...
How is the Tacoma superior? Im genuinely curious as I thoroughly test drove and researched bothI checked out the Toyota. I liked it a lot. I only wanted the TRD Pro. The dealers wanted $50K for a M/T. That's excessive. Other than the awkward seating position, the Tacoma is almost universally a superior truck.
Well, every problem with a Tacoma is a one-off, whereas every problem with a Ranger is a major systemic failure.How is the Tacoma superior?
Ranger is fairly new so im genuinely curious what systemic failure you’re referring too and whether or not i should be concerned......Well, every problem with a Tacoma is a one-off, whereas every problem with a Ranger is a major systemic failure.
No, it's just a commentary on the weird reputation the Tacoma has for reliability, regardless of any problems people have with their Tacomas. A couple of people report fuel in their oil and Tacoma fanboys will tell you that every Ranger engine will blow up before it hits 100k, but Toyota recalls a decade worth of Tacomas for frame rust and that's no big deal and won't affect anyone. ?‍Ranger is fairly new so im genuinely curious what systemic failure you’re referring too and whether or not i should be concerned......
My buddy just traded his 2018 Tacoma in because of a fuel pump recall and he was scared of reliability, but go on…Well, every problem with a Tacoma is a one-off, whereas every problem with a Ranger is a major systemic failure.
Haha I mean u can just tell the taco outsells its competitors. If u live in WA state u can throw a rock in any direction and hit an outback or tacomawhos cheating??
![]()
same here in vancouver....but its the maths man....someones grabbing an extra 1%.Haha I mean u can just tell the taco outsells its competitors. If u live in WA state u can throw a rock in any direction and hit an outback or tacoma
Toyota has done an amazing job over the years of creating, then promoting their reputation for worry free vehicle ownership. 30-40 yrs ago this tale had some substance. They set the bar, but now the other mfgs. have met it. ...they have to. You can't survive in today's market producing lemons.No, it's just a commentary on the weird reputation the Tacoma has for reliability, regardless of any problems people have with their Tacomas. A couple of people report fuel in their oil and Tacoma fanboys will tell you that every Ranger engine will blow up before it hits 100k, but Toyota recalls a decade worth of Tacomas for frame rust and that's no big deal and won't affect anyone. ?‍![]()
...thinking Consumer Reports "compiled" the data.whos cheating??
![]()