Rp930
Well-Known Member
Except the emissions you get are carcinogenic. Give it up. There is no good excuse for tampering with emissions.But using less fuel means less emissions.
Sponsored
Except the emissions you get are carcinogenic. Give it up. There is no good excuse for tampering with emissions.But using less fuel means less emissions.
I’m saying tampering with diesel emissions (which is what he was convicted of) can lead to more carcinogenic emissions regardless of the amount of fuel used.Are you saying using less fuel means more carcinogenic emissions?
Just trying to understand you. It really didn't make sense at first. (Not it sure it does now.) Go ahead and treat yourself to some ice cream.I’m saying tampering with diesel emissions (which is what he was convicted of) can lead to more carcinogenic emissions regardless of the amount of fuel used.
Thats it from me. I’m not here to play word games with you.
Did someone say ice cream?!I dunno...I think ice cream is always a great option!
Would appear so as unregulated diesel emission carcinogenics are about 100 times more in volume. So fuel saving would need to be 99,9% in order to get to even level.Are you saying using less fuel means more carcinogenic emissions?