P. A. Schilke
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Phil
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Threads
- 149
- Messages
- 7,083
- Reaction score
- 37,188
- Location
- GV Arizona
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
- Occupation
- Engineer Retired
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
Hi Dave,Based on the votes on the poll not everyone has the shudder or notices it. I would guess the delay of production versus the severity of the issue played a part in this as well. I'm sure Phil S. can give some insight to this dilemma.
It is known that two piece drivelines are prone to start up shudder (or at least us old timers faced this problem on occasion). To use a two piece driveline on Ranger was a program decision on the North American version of Ranger. It can be driven by many different criteria, Fuel tank size, Crash performance, cost, complexity etc. Was it experienced during NA Ranger development?....IDK, but would seem likely and would have resulted in trying to optimize angles to minimize or desensitize the vehicle. However, development testing is on a very small population of prototypes and encompasses many vehicle configurations, trim levels etc.
My opinion and my opinion only is that the program accepted the risk that would be a few vehicles that exhibit start up shudder. However, it appears the NVH engineers had to revisit the concern as the number of problem vehicles was larger than was "sold" to the program. The TSB would not have been issued for onezee, twozee problem vehicles.
This is one of the reasons I implored folks to open a formal complaint and in this case it worked as a TSB was issued. However, as the cases show it is not always going to fix every vehicle which is unfortunate but it is what it is for now.
Best,
Phil Schilke
Ranger Vehicle Engineering
Ford Motor Co. Retired
Sponsored