VAMike
Well-Known Member
This is, in my opinion, a perfectly rational response to a business environment where a worker will get fired the moment that helps the quarterly numbers. What's the point in investing hundreds of hours learning something for a short term job when that knowledge will be completely useless in the next short term job? It's far more rational to spend that time looking for the next gig. It would be nice if employers rewarded initiative and long term thinking with loyalty in return, but that's rare these days. For car dealers in particular it's a job that chews people up and spits them out--I went through 3 or 4 sales guys while Ford was building my ranger. ("X doesn't work here anymore, can I help you?") If it were the case that spending time learning the product would make the job last more than a couple of months then of course they should do that, but I don't see any sign that it would make a difference. Their reward structure is built around squeezing as much money as possible out of people as quickly as they can. There are no rewards for the customer thinking you know what you're talking about, and no thought of return sales. (The sales guy will probably not still be there when the customer buys their next car.) I get that some people bought their trucks at some little family place from the same guy they've used since nixon was in office, but that's really the exception these days.It seems to be actually a larger audience than just auto sales. If you pay attention closely, the attitude of "it's work" seems prevalent all over. Looks like pride in work has been killed off by the PC-ness need to punish any achievement...just say'n.![]()
Sponsored
?