Sponsored

Intake Valve Cleaning

Buckbull

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Nov 9, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
355
Reaction score
1,441
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Ranger Tremor
Occupation
Software Architect
The 6g 2.3 in the ranger has both port and direct injection so it shouldn't be an issue with them. Below is walnut shell cleaning from Dave's auto.

Sponsored

 

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
169
Messages
7,682
Reaction score
10,956
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
The 6g 2.3 in the ranger has both port and direct injection so it shouldn't be an issue with them. Below is walnut shell cleaning from Dave's auto.

If that is the case, then the 6G is safe. The 5G on the other hand is a different story
 

dtech

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
3,183
Reaction score
7,791
Location
colorado
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat FX4, chromed and forever damperless
Sport Mode and a heavy foot... my valves look like Mr. Cleans shiny head and there is 0% fuel in my oil,...ZERO % i tell ya !
That's exactly why I elect to use vape pens, keeps my intake system nice and clean, might have to start using prevagen to counteract the brain fog
 

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
134
Messages
5,512
Reaction score
14,504
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional
The 6g 2.3 in the ranger has both port and direct injection so it shouldn't be an issue with them. Below is walnut shell cleaning from Dave's auto.
Not the Raptors. Found that out AFTER I bought one.
I dig the Dave's Auto vids.
 

PapaBill

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
97
Reaction score
116
Location
Savannah, GA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Crew 4x4
Occupation
USMC Retired; Mech.Engineer
So I posted about using CRC Intake Valve cleaner last week hoping to get some feedback but just ended up with a couple of guys arguing pretty much the entire thread which resulted in it being closed down by the mediator.

However, what I think I learned from some who did offer information was that with 78,000 miles on the 2019 engine it may be best to avoid this due to pieces breaking off and possibly pitting and damaging the turbo. Thoughts on this? The truck runs fine, I use top tier fuel and higher octane when prices are affordable but I love this truck and hope to keep it running strong for several more years. I'm not an engine mechanice so I'm looking for advice from the experts who are more knowledgable than I am regarding this issue or concern.

I don't want to hear whether you think the engine needs it or not unless you have solid information. Just because Ford doesn't have it listed for service doesn't mean it's not worth doing. For excample, Ford states tranny service every 150,000 miles. Every Ford mechanic I talk to recommends at 60 to 75,000 miles base on their experiece working on the truck. So please, no arguing this time, just information as I'm sure there are others interested in this topic.

Thanks!
Scott
1. How about a 1pint of a 1:1:1 blend of acetone, butyl cellosolve; and N- Methyl pyrrolidone or maybe some straight lacquer thinner?

2.. Take the flex tube off from the intercooler outlet and intake port and mist the stuff in with a hand pump sprayer in mist form.

3. No Jack Daniel's though or. Canadian Whiskey... to expensive with the 50% tarriff.
Whatcha think??
Thanks,
Bill
 
Last edited:


Rp930

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,819
Reaction score
3,537
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
‘19 Ford Ranger Lariat, ‘23 Macan,’21 Shelby GT500
Occupation
Retired
1. How about a 1pint of a 1:1:1 blend of acetone, butyl cellosolve; and N- Methyl pyrrolidone or maybe some straight lacquer thinner?

2.. Take the flex tube off from the intercooler outlet and intake port and mist the stuff in with a hand pump sprayer in mist form.

3. No Jack Daniel's though or. Canadian Whiskey... to expensive with the 50% tarriff.
Whatcha think??
Thanks,
Bill
Sounds perfect. What could possibly go wrong?

Mixing up concoctions for a problem that likely doesn’t exist seems like a great idea.
 
 








Top