Sponsored

Long range fuel tank

jblc

Well-Known Member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Threads
75
Messages
749
Reaction score
644
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2021 XLT FX2 supercab
Long range America sells 36 gallon tanks for about $2k + shipping. Out if my price range for sure
On their website, it didn't look like they had Ford options available in the dropdown option menus. Am i just missing it? :)
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
Frenchy

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,540
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
On their website, it didn't look like they had Ford options available in the dropdown option menus. Am i just missing it? :)
They don't have it there because it's not available yet. It is still in the works at this time
 

U3270

Active Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
44
Reaction score
34
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat FX4
I received a quote from Khris Korell of Long Range American for a 36 gallon 2019+ Ford Ranger fuel tank. Cost stated was $2095 plus shipping.
 

HDA

Well-Known Member
First Name
Hector
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
220
Reaction score
804
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger XLT Shadow Black
Occupation
Travel X-ray Tech
But there’s still problems with installation isn’t there?
If there wasn’t I would buy one without thinking twice. Hell I would drive to Idaho to have them install it.
 


OP
OP
Frenchy

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,540
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
But there’s still problems with installation isn’t there?
If there wasn’t I would buy one without thinking twice. Hell I would drive to Idaho to have them install it.
That is why it is still in the works. As impatient as most are getting unfortunately we must wait.
 

Yama_Ranger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
68
Reaction score
144
Location
Earth
Vehicle(s)
2013 Raptor Soon 2021 APG Ranger
I’m still in as well. Heck, I don’t even want the Ranger without this mod. LR tank or selling!
 
OP
OP
Frenchy

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,540
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
I’m still in as well. Heck, I don’t even want the Ranger without this mod. LR tank or selling!
Sounds silly to me. As long as you are under the roght conditions you can still get fair range with these trucks. Dont get me wrong, we could still use a much bigger range but until the changes are made and verified things are still up in the air.
 

slowmachine

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
929
Reaction score
1,978
Location
New Hampshire
Vehicle(s)
2015 Jeep Wrangler, waiting for a Ranger PHEV
I’m still in as well. Heck, I don’t even want the Ranger without this mod. LR tank or selling!
Actual range on the factory fuel tank is in the same ballpark with equally-configured Tacoma, Colorado, and Frontier. If you truly need more range, you need a bigger truck.
 

62champ

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
11
Reaction score
51
Location
North Central Texas
Vehicle(s)
'20 FX4/'62 7E7/'62S-J8-26K original
Wow - and I thought the price for a new re-manufactured fuel tank for my Studebaker truck was a little on the pricey side . . . ($495) . . . but also still factory 18 gallons as well.

08UrBxmh.webp
 
OP
OP
Frenchy

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,540
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
Actual range on the factory fuel tank is in the same ballpark with equally-configured Tacoma, Colorado, and Frontier. If you truly need more range, you need a bigger truck.
Not necessarily. I used to own a frontier with a V6 and when loaded down with a trailer I could get better range with the frontier compared to the range. Why? Well that's because the ranger still has a 4 cylinder no matter how you look at it
 

slowmachine

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
929
Reaction score
1,978
Location
New Hampshire
Vehicle(s)
2015 Jeep Wrangler, waiting for a Ranger PHEV
Not necessarily. I used to own a frontier with a V6 and when loaded down with a trailer I could get better range with the frontier compared to the range. Why? Well that's because the ranger still has a 4 cylinder no matter how you look at it
Manufacturer's published ratings for 2021 model year:

EPA Mileage numbers City/Highway/Combined. Tank Capacity.

Colorado Z71 4x4 Crew Cab V6 17/24/19 21.0 gal
Frontier SV 4x4 Crew Cab V6 17/23/19. 21.1 gal
Tacoma SR5 Crew Cab V6 18/22. 21.1 gal
Ranger Lariat Crew Cab 2.3 EcoBoost 20/24/22. 18 gal

Full Tank Capacity x City/Highway/Combined.

Colorado 357/504/399
Frontier 359/485/401
Tacoma 380/464/???
Ranger 360/432/396

The EPA ratings are the only objective standard, and even this is somewhat subject to purposeful tweaking by the manufacturers. All other data is anecdotal. I call this "in the ballpark."
 
OP
OP
Frenchy

Frenchy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Threads
164
Messages
7,540
Reaction score
10,750
Location
Elizabeth, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2012 Nissan Frontier, 1994 F150 XL, 2022 Ford Transit
Occupation
Field Service Technician
Manufacturer's published ratings for 2021 model year:

EPA Mileage numbers City/Highway/Combined. Tank Capacity.

Colorado Z71 4x4 Crew Cab V6 17/24/19 21.0 gal
Frontier SV 4x4 Crew Cab V6 17/23/19. 21.1 gal
Tacoma SR5 Crew Cab V6 18/22. 21.1 gal
Ranger Lariat Crew Cab 2.3 EcoBoost 20/24/22. 18 gal

Full Tank Capacity x City/Highway/Combined.

Colorado 357/504/399
Frontier 359/485/401
Tacoma 380/464/???
Ranger 360/432/396

The EPA ratings are the only objective standard, and even this is somewhat subject to purposeful tweaking by the manufacturers. All other data is anecdotal. I call this "in the ballpark."
Trust me I do understand the EPA ratings and I've been very close on the EPA ratings between my truck and the frontier I used to. But when you're loaded down with the trailer of the EPA ratings don't mean anything because the EPA ratings don't include Towing. Simple as that. At the factory you're not counting
 

slowmachine

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
929
Reaction score
1,978
Location
New Hampshire
Vehicle(s)
2015 Jeep Wrangler, waiting for a Ranger PHEV
Trust me I do understand the EPA ratings and I've been very close on the EPA ratings between my truck and the frontier I used to. But when you're loaded down with the trailer of the EPA ratings don't mean anything because the EPA ratings don't include Towing. Simple as that. At the factory you're not counting
Trust me, I do understand that you may have driven different trucks and noticed what you believe to be different fuel efficiency, But when you’re making any valid comparison you need a defined test that produces verifiable and repeatable results. Simple as that. At the factory, they do this. Your comparison is invalid because you have no objective, verifiable, and repeatable results to offer.
 

J Krutsch

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jon
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
63
Reaction score
97
Location
Bend, Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT Supercrew FX4
After pulling my trailer over 6K miles, I have verifiable and repeatable results over 40+ fill ups. I get 10.3 mpg. The range on an 18 gal tank may be fine on the East coast where gas station density is high, but it is uncomfortable in the Northwest where stations can be few and far between. The factory tank is just too small for the rated towing capacity.
Sponsored

 
 








Top