charwest
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- char & tony
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
- Threads
- 42
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 727
- Location
- On the road
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Ranger XL FX4 Supercab
- Occupation
- Healthcare
- Thread starter
- #1
we want to upgrade to a 32" all terrain tire on our stock fx4. other threads confirm duratrac fits in this size, and one post notes that a KO2 will as well (no lift, no mods, no rub)
what we want is more clearance, with the least hit to MPG and zippiness as possible. it is our daily driver, but we offroad and camp ("overland") regularly, almost every weekend. skinny tire sounds good to us. we don't care a bit about how it looks.
initially i was planning on duratrac, mostly because it was confirmed to work and was nice and light. some reviews talk about sidewall fragility, which is a concern to us as we travel solo and do some rock crawling. most reviews say quiet, although some say noisy. eyeballing the tread suggests it would be noisy but i dunno..
data:
hancook stock 265/65/17 35 lbs
duratrac 255/75/17 37 lbs (from one supplier) or 40 lbs (from another supplier and one website)
KO2 255/75/17 47 lbs (from one supplier and one website)
questions:
1) how does duratrac sidewall compare to stock hancook ATM? if its an upgrade, thats probably sufficient for us. i dont know if we need the burliest sidewall out there, given it sacrifices weight.
2) is duratrac popular because it is aggressive looking? this is far more aggro looking than our hancooks (it is listed as mud terrain on some websites) and i worry a little bit that it is popular because it is bad-ass looking, and not because of real all terrain function. i dont want to get a noisy tire with thin sidewalls because people think it looks awesome.
3) is there another tire i should be looking at? a quick look at falken wildpeak and general grabber (which seem to generally be liked) doesnt show a tire in this size or similar enough that i would get the clearance/narrow width i need to make it work confidently.
really would appreciate the help--
what we want is more clearance, with the least hit to MPG and zippiness as possible. it is our daily driver, but we offroad and camp ("overland") regularly, almost every weekend. skinny tire sounds good to us. we don't care a bit about how it looks.
initially i was planning on duratrac, mostly because it was confirmed to work and was nice and light. some reviews talk about sidewall fragility, which is a concern to us as we travel solo and do some rock crawling. most reviews say quiet, although some say noisy. eyeballing the tread suggests it would be noisy but i dunno..
data:
hancook stock 265/65/17 35 lbs
duratrac 255/75/17 37 lbs (from one supplier) or 40 lbs (from another supplier and one website)
KO2 255/75/17 47 lbs (from one supplier and one website)
questions:
1) how does duratrac sidewall compare to stock hancook ATM? if its an upgrade, thats probably sufficient for us. i dont know if we need the burliest sidewall out there, given it sacrifices weight.
2) is duratrac popular because it is aggressive looking? this is far more aggro looking than our hancooks (it is listed as mud terrain on some websites) and i worry a little bit that it is popular because it is bad-ass looking, and not because of real all terrain function. i dont want to get a noisy tire with thin sidewalls because people think it looks awesome.
3) is there another tire i should be looking at? a quick look at falken wildpeak and general grabber (which seem to generally be liked) doesnt show a tire in this size or similar enough that i would get the clearance/narrow width i need to make it work confidently.
really would appreciate the help--
Sponsored