Sponsored

The Trouble With Moving On

mtsoxfan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Threads
53
Messages
846
Reaction score
1,741
Location
NEK VT
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
Yeah they're returning to their HEMI V8 roots. For now. Hopefully without Start-Stop BS that helps kill gas engines. I hope they don't go cylinder deactivation either. Just give us V8's please! As much as I love my Turbocharged Ranger, especially in Hot and High situations, there's just nothing like a V8 engine. There is no replacement for displacement when it comes to ICE's. I'm fine with hybrids. Boring as all hell but ok it's easier to live with than full electric.
I actually compared a hybred and normal engine when I was test driving cars. Same car, different engine and the hybred blew the other away. Hold on Cowboy kinda fun. Felt better than a turbo. Alas, I ended up with a different make. Not sure that would translate the same in a truck.
Sponsored

 

OCL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
206
Reaction score
598
Location
Mission Viejo, California
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger Tremor
Yeah so hybrids today on high performance trucks and SUV's make more power. Cost more and more power. But VERY complicated. I get what you mean though if I had reasonable assurance that my hybrid will be reliable I probably would get one if it's more powerful and doesn't sound like ass.
 

TJC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Threads
47
Messages
4,035
Reaction score
10,196
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
93 Miata, 05 Ranger 4x4, 20 Ranger 4x4, 23 CX-5
I want pure mechanical!
In order of preference for a Truck, give me:
  1. The old Ford 300 inline 6. Over built, slow, but will last forever, and easy to work on.
  2. Old Chevy V8 small blocks - 265, 283, 327, 350 (I 'd even allow electronic ignition on this one, but nothing more)
  3. For a car, the old ~2000 Models of Crown VIc. Boring but reliable.
I'm a devout techie, but I value reliability and repair-ability over all else in my vehicles. Oh! And one last thing... absolutely NO 'Nanny Tech".

One last thought, my 2005 Ranger 4.0 V6 has proven to be extremely reliable.
 
OP
OP
GhostStrykre

GhostStrykre

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bee
Joined
Aug 20, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
509
Reaction score
1,909
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT FX4
I want pure mechanical!
In order of preference for a Truck, give me:
  1. The old Ford 300 inline 6. Over built, slow, but will last forever, and easy to work on.
  2. Old Chevy V8 small blocks - 265, 283, 327, 350 (I 'd even allow electronic ignition on this one, but nothing more)
  3. For a car, the old ~2000 Models of Crown VIc. Boring but reliable.
I'm a devout techie, but I value reliability and repair-ability over all else in my vehicles. Oh! And one last thing... absolutely NO 'Nanny Tech".

One last thought, my 2005 Ranger 4.0 V6 has proven to be extremely reliable.
REO. You seek REO!

https://reotrucks.com/
 

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
132
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
14,200
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional


OCL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
206
Reaction score
598
Location
Mission Viejo, California
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger Tremor
I want pure mechanical!
In order of preference for a Truck, give me:
  1. The old Ford 300 inline 6. Over built, slow, but will last forever, and easy to work on.
  2. Old Chevy V8 small blocks - 265, 283, 327, 350 (I 'd even allow electronic ignition on this one, but nothing more)
  3. For a car, the old ~2000 Models of Crown VIc. Boring but reliable.
I'm a devout techie, but I value reliability and repair-ability over all else in my vehicles. Oh! And one last thing... absolutely NO 'Nanny Tech".

One last thought, my 2005 Ranger 4.0 V6 has proven to be extremely reliable.
I had a 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. It had the Dual Exhaust option and floor shifter. Yes you heard that right. That was a rare option on a Merc. It was a little faster than the Crown Vic cop cars of the time. 250 hp with handling package. Yeah it was super reliable and tough as nails. You want the later models with the wider track and more power. Classic American sedan. 0-60 in 8 seconds. I also had the last of the Chevy small blocks: 1991 Chevy Corvette with the L97 350 TPi motor and 4-speed automatic OD transmission. It had ABS and electronically controlled suspension. But no other nanny shit. Another reliable V8, and relatively simple compared to today's cars. And was fast too. 250 hp on a car that was so light! 0-60 in 5 seconds. The Chevy small block so much better than the Ford 4.6. After all that I got the Mustang GT with the 4.6 SOHC 3 valve with 5-speed automatic. Oh my goodness! Not as fast as the Corvette, didn't handle as good, but just as much fun. Maybe more fun. The looks alone was killer. Looked like a modern Bullitt style 'Stang. And the sound of that V8 was intoxicating. I can go on and on with V8's!
 

TJC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Threads
47
Messages
4,035
Reaction score
10,196
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
93 Miata, 05 Ranger 4x4, 20 Ranger 4x4, 23 CX-5
My 93' Miata 1.6L 4 cyl supercharged out ran a lot of 5.0 Mustangs of the era. It only had ~200hp but it was LIGHT. Physics matter. HP to Weight ratio matters. Those square bodied late 1980's Mustangs weren't that fast, even the early to mid 90's models were relatively slow.
 

dozxab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Sep 14, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
573
Reaction score
1,800
Location
Prescott AZ
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Ranger XLT FX4, 2014 Jeep Wrangler JK
Occupation
Retired
My 93' Miata 1.6L 4 cyl supercharged out ran a lot of 5.0 Mustangs of the era. It only had ~200hp but it was LIGHT. Physics matter. HP to Weight ratio matters. Those square bodied late 1980's Mustangs weren't that fast, even the early to mid 90's models were relatively slow.
My '89 5.0 Mustang ran 14.05 @ 100 MPH in the quarter. Not shabby for that era. Granted, my '16 V6 ran a hair faster with a tune.
 

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
132
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
14,200
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional
REO Speedwagon originated in my home town where I still live! You Can Tune a Piano but You Can't Tuna Fish! Just sayin.
One of my all time fav 80's bands.
 

TJC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Threads
47
Messages
4,035
Reaction score
10,196
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
93 Miata, 05 Ranger 4x4, 20 Ranger 4x4, 23 CX-5
My '89 5.0 Mustang ran 14.05 @ 100 MPH in the quarter. Not shabby for that era. Granted, my '16 V6 ran a hair faster with a tune.
My 0-60 was 5 seconds. Not fast by today's standards, but respectable. Never ran a 1/4 mile. I had a 3rd party ECU to keep A/F ratios proper, and a large water cooled intercooler to keep intake temps under control.. and a knock sensor to keep from grenading it. I still own it, started to move to a turbo, but fell ill and never finished the work. I really need to get back to it, at 70+ you start to feel the timeline a bit.
 

dozxab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Sep 14, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
573
Reaction score
1,800
Location
Prescott AZ
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Ranger XLT FX4, 2014 Jeep Wrangler JK
Occupation
Retired
My 0-60 was 5 seconds. Not fast by today's standards, but respectable. Never ran a 1/4 mile. I had a 3rd party ECU to keep A/F ratios proper, and a large water cooled intercooler to keep intake temps under control.. and a knock sensor to keep from grenading it. I still own it, started to move to a turbo, but fell ill and never finished the work. I really need to get back to it, at 70+ you start to feel the timeline a bit.
I get it, early 70's for me as well. I won't do any major work now. Partly age and partly technology. One more for that list I mentioned. '70 Mustang Mach 1 with a 428 CJ. With a very early aftermarket electronic ignition, traction bars and custom dual exhaust, ran 13.83 @ 104. Motors got progressively smaller with no hit to performance. The handling got exponentially better though. :)
Sponsored

 
 








Top