Sponsored

I'm impressed with

Tangent

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Threads
5
Messages
126
Reaction score
202
Location
Oregon US
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford XL Ranger 4x4 Supercrew
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think mine is pretty quiet when it starts compare to my old Ranger, When the gas kicks in on our Prius, it feels the same as my Ranger?
Yeah, it's not super bad or anything, but definitely noticable. Kinda wish the button was on the steering wheel, so you could hit it for short stops without reaching/looking down. I always feel like I lost some kind of game when I have to stop for like, 1 second or less.

Wonder at what time frame the fuel gain from stopping outweighs the fuel from starting.
Sponsored

 

hughesjv

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
294
Reaction score
478
Location
Aurora, CO
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4
The auto headlights. They come on during the day when I manually switch on the wipers, even intermittent. The dash gauges do not dim to night mode with headlights on/ wipers on during the day.
I am impressed with the head lights too especially how the brights come on and off at exactly the right times...I could not possibly be that accurate.
 

scubalizard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Threads
9
Messages
81
Reaction score
47
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT
I am impressed with the cross traffic sensor, in Houston no one cares that you are backing out of a space (unless they are shark parking) and more than willing to run you over. Already like the alert as everyone drives big trucks and you can’t see around, but those sensors sure can.
 

FULLSCALE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Threads
38
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
2,180
Location
Ontario, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4 Supercrew, 2011 Mazda 3 Sport GT-E, 1968 Ford Mustang
I am impressed with the head lights too especially how the brights come on and off at exactly the right times...I could not possibly be that accurate.
I agree with that one. I never shut the auto high beams off!
 

Enitan

Well-Known Member
First Name
Drew
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Threads
16
Messages
115
Reaction score
268
Location
Western NY
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT - FX4
I am impressed with the head lights too especially how the brights come on and off at exactly the right times...I could not possibly be that accurate.
I agree with that one. I never shut the auto high beams off!
Agreed! Ford knocked it out of the park on this feature with the ranger. I’ve had it on other vehicles and it was clunky and just bad. The ranger is a beast with it. There’s been times where I’ve been just about ready to reach for it when I’d normally cut them or click em up and it goes. Meanwhile I go “oh .... wow” every time
 


Mokume

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Threads
44
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
2,740
Location
Honolulu, Hawaii
Vehicle(s)
2000 Ranger Supercab (sold 12/19) , 2002 Honda CR-V
Occupation
Retired Firefighter III, Honolulu Fire Department
Kind of like a 4 cylinder Pinto motor... well... until you step on the Go Pedal :like:
Good God please don't let my first 4 cyl. Ford product I've ever owned perform like the anemic Lima 2.3 liter Pinto engine of the seventies.
True, this engine was saddled with emission control "stopgap" measures (as all engines were then), but this poor little 4 banger was especially affected.
The Lincoln-Mercury dealership where I worked as a mechanic had 4 of these (Bobcats) as service loaners, we called them the "penalty boxes" all of them sported automatic transmissions. Customers who were "lucky' enough to drive 1 of these gems would beg us to finish their car so that they could be rid of it. True, they were potent dirt track engines, when setup properly.
Hopefully the Ecoboost 2.3 in my 2020 SuperCab shares just 2 things with that woeful engine: displacement and manufacturer.
 

RedlandRanger

Moderator
First Name
Rob
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Threads
42
Messages
5,111
Reaction score
11,104
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4, 1973 Mercury Capri
Vehicle Showcase
1
Good God please don't let my first 4 cyl. Ford product I've ever owned perform like the anemic Lima 2.3 liter Pinto engine of the seventies.
True, this engine was saddled with emission control "stopgap" measures (as all engines were then), but this poor little 4 banger was especially affected.
The Lincoln-Mercury dealership where I worked as a mechanic had 4 of these (Bobcats) as service loaners, we called them the "penalty boxes" all of them sported automatic transmissions. Customers who were "lucky' enough to drive 1 of these gems would beg us to finish their car so that they could be rid of it. True, they were potent dirt track engines, when setup properly.
Hopefully the Ecoboost 2.3 in my 2020 SuperCab shares just 2 things with that woeful engine: displacement and manufacturer.
I can safely say you will have nothing to worry about.
 

Mokume

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Threads
44
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
2,740
Location
Honolulu, Hawaii
Vehicle(s)
2000 Ranger Supercab (sold 12/19) , 2002 Honda CR-V
Occupation
Retired Firefighter III, Honolulu Fire Department

khyros

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Dec 7, 2018
Threads
15
Messages
322
Reaction score
343
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat Crewcab FX4
Vehicle Showcase
1
Yeah, it's not super bad or anything, but definitely noticable. Kinda wish the button was on the steering wheel, so you could hit it for short stops without reaching/looking down. I always feel like I lost some kind of game when I have to stop for like, 1 second or less.

Wonder at what time frame the fuel gain from stopping outweighs the fuel from starting.
That's the great thing about direct injection compared to port injected or worse - carbureted, the fuel gain is instantaneous. Since the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, there is no fuel left to slosh around in the manifold, which is where the old saying of "it takes more fuel to restart compared to let it idle" comes from. That fuel that was in the manifold would settle down to low points (valves) and then go through the cylinders unburned while you're turning it over to restart. Direct injected sprays only what is needed for that stroke into the chamber. So it allows you to do things like shut off the fuel during coast down or at a red light and instantly have fuel savings - even if it's not a ton.



Let's do some mostly arbitrary math with some assumptions. My truck gets around 30mpg going 45mph, which seems to be the sweetest spot. Which means that it's consuming 1.5gal/hr at that speed. Let's assume that the engine is basically not under a lot of strain there, and the stoichiometric ratio is pretty much the same there as it is at idle. And let's also assume it is at 2000rpm there and 600rpm at idle. That means that at idle, it will be consuming .45gal/hr. This means that when you're stopped at a red light for an average time of 30 seconds, you're saving .00375 gallons of fuel. Let's also assume you get stuck at 3 red lights on your way to/from work each day... So in the course of a week, that's .1125 gallons. And 50 weeks a year, that's 5.625 gallons of fuel saved.

If you drive the average of 12,000 miles a year, and you get the 22mpg overall that the sticker shows, then you're consuming 545.5 gallons a year. So this 5.6 gallon Stop/Start savings represents a 1% fuel savings. Is it that big of a deal? Nah - but based on advertisements (and my mom, who has like 18 different credit cards and uses each one depending on if it's groceries/pharmacy/fuel/airline/hotel/etc), people will switch credit cards to get a similar level of savings on cash back rewards over their current credit card. Then again, I think the hassle of tracking down that marginal gain isn't worth the complexity of having specialized credit cards, and just stick with a decent overall card - so you could make the same argument here - the 1% fuel savings isn't worth the hassle of dealing with stop/start.
 

Mokume

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Threads
44
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
2,740
Location
Honolulu, Hawaii
Vehicle(s)
2000 Ranger Supercab (sold 12/19) , 2002 Honda CR-V
Occupation
Retired Firefighter III, Honolulu Fire Department
That's the great thing about direct injection compared to port injected or worse - carbureted, the fuel gain is instantaneous. Since the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, there is no fuel left to slosh around in the manifold, which is where the old saying of "it takes more fuel to restart compared to let it idle" comes from. That fuel that was in the manifold would settle down to low points (valves) and then go through the cylinders unburned while you're turning it over to restart. Direct injected sprays only what is needed for that stroke into the chamber. So it allows you to do things like shut off the fuel during coast down or at a red light and instantly have fuel savings - even if it's not a ton.



Let's do some mostly arbitrary math with some assumptions. My truck gets around 30mpg going 45mph, which seems to be the sweetest spot. Which means that it's consuming 1.5gal/hr at that speed. Let's assume that the engine is basically not under a lot of strain there, and the stoichiometric ratio is pretty much the same there as it is at idle. And let's also assume it is at 2000rpm there and 600rpm at idle. That means that at idle, it will be consuming .45gal/hr. This means that when you're stopped at a red light for an average time of 30 seconds, you're saving .00375 gallons of fuel. Let's also assume you get stuck at 3 red lights on your way to/from work each day... So in the course of a week, that's .1125 gallons. And 50 weeks a year, that's 5.625 gallons of fuel saved.

If you drive the average of 12,000 miles a year, and you get the 22mpg overall that the sticker shows, then you're consuming 545.5 gallons a year. So this 5.6 gallon Stop/Start savings represents a 1% fuel savings. Is it that big of a deal? Nah - but based on advertisements (and my mom, who has like 18 different credit cards and uses each one depending on if it's groceries/pharmacy/fuel/airline/hotel/etc), people will switch credit cards to get a similar level of savings on cash back rewards over their current credit card. Then again, I think the hassle of tracking down that marginal gain isn't worth the complexity of having specialized credit cards, and just stick with a decent overall card - so you could make the same argument here - the 1% fuel savings isn't worth the hassle of dealing with stop/start.
 

Deleted member 1634

That's the great thing about direct injection compared to port injected or worse - carbureted, the fuel gain is instantaneous. Since the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, there is no fuel left to slosh around in the manifold, which is where the old saying of "it takes more fuel to restart compared to let it idle" comes from. That fuel that was in the manifold would settle down to low points (valves) and then go through the cylinders unburned while you're turning it over to restart. Direct injected sprays only what is needed for that stroke into the chamber. So it allows you to do things like shut off the fuel during coast down or at a red light and instantly have fuel savings - even if it's not a ton.



Let's do some mostly arbitrary math with some assumptions. My truck gets around 30mpg going 45mph, which seems to be the sweetest spot. Which means that it's consuming 1.5gal/hr at that speed. Let's assume that the engine is basically not under a lot of strain there, and the stoichiometric ratio is pretty much the same there as it is at idle. And let's also assume it is at 2000rpm there and 600rpm at idle. That means that at idle, it will be consuming .45gal/hr. This means that when you're stopped at a red light for an average time of 30 seconds, you're saving .00375 gallons of fuel. Let's also assume you get stuck at 3 red lights on your way to/from work each day... So in the course of a week, that's .1125 gallons. And 50 weeks a year, that's 5.625 gallons of fuel saved.

If you drive the average of 12,000 miles a year, and you get the 22mpg overall that the sticker shows, then you're consuming 545.5 gallons a year. So this 5.6 gallon Stop/Start savings represents a 1% fuel savings. Is it that big of a deal? Nah - but based on advertisements (and my mom, who has like 18 different credit cards and uses each one depending on if it's groceries/pharmacy/fuel/airline/hotel/etc), people will switch credit cards to get a similar level of savings on cash back rewards over their current credit card. Then again, I think the hassle of tracking down that marginal gain isn't worth the complexity of having specialized credit cards, and just stick with a decent overall card - so you could make the same argument here - the 1% fuel savings isn't worth the hassle of dealing with stop/start.
That's only if you consider start/stop to be a hassle. Personally, I don't. Sure it's maybe only 1%. But it's a free 1%. Those turning off start/stop, either by pushing the button every time or buying something to stop it, are essentially wasting time and/or money to NOT save that 1%. Obviously they're trading that 1% of savings for not having to deal with the perceived "hassle". And that's fine, we all have to make a choice and compromise on things to get what we want. Personally I'd rather do nothing and save fuel. Your experience may vary.
 

AzScorpion

Moderator
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Threads
335
Messages
26,221
Reaction score
131,998
Location
Back Home In AZ!
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Ranger Tremor
Occupation
Retired...Full Time Slacker
That's only if you consider start/stop to be a hassle. Personally, I don't. Sure it's maybe only 1%. But it's a free 1%. Those turning off start/stop, either by pushing the button every time or buying something to stop it, are essentially wasting time and/or money to NOT save that 1%. Obviously they're trading that 1% of savings for not having to deal with the perceived "hassle". And that's fine, we all have to make a choice and compromise on things to get what we want. Personally I'd rather do nothing and save fuel. Your experience may vary.
For me it's an annoyance so the 5.6 gal savings is not worth it for me. I have 4 quick stops just to get out of my community but if there were a delay for short stops than I might use it more. Even pulling into the garage is annoying as you come to a stop once you're inside and it shuts down,then starts up again just so you can put it into park. A simple LED light plugged in the back solves this easy enough.:)
 

Hedgie

Active Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 15, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
36
Reaction score
63
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2019 ranger xlt , 2014 Harley triglide
Occupation
Retired firefighter/medic
Lost me when you said math
 

Tangent

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Threads
5
Messages
126
Reaction score
202
Location
Oregon US
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford XL Ranger 4x4 Supercrew
Vehicle Showcase
1
For me it's an annoyance so the 5.6 gal savings is not worth it for me. I have 4 quick stops just to get out of my community but if there were a delay for short stops than I might use it more. Even pulling into the garage is annoying as you come to a stop once you're inside and it shuts down,then starts up again just so you can put it into park. A simple LED light plugged in the back solves this easy enough.:)
The parking thing drives me nuts! Pull into driveway, stop, engine shuts off, put it in park, engine starts, turn off engine. There's gotta be a better way, like turning off the key and then putting it in park?

That and the half second stop starts are what drive me batty. I'm all for saving fuel down to the point where I'm paranoid about putting rock sliders on because they'd add 120lbs, and that's a 1-2% decrease according to the EPA. But those two things are truly annoying, don't know how much you can do about the half second stop/starts though other than thinking ahead and hitting the button.

Back to the subject title, I've found myself really impressed/enamored with the wiper controls the past week or so. The pass-through switch for interval is such a clever little piece of design.
 

Traneman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jay
Joined
Aug 15, 2019
Threads
18
Messages
334
Reaction score
385
Location
Rochester MN
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger STX 4x4
The parking thing drives me nuts! Pull into driveway, stop, engine shuts off, put it in park, engine starts, turn off engine. There's gotta be a better way, like turning off the key and then putting it in park?
Guess I learned to put it into park quicker when I pull into the driveway/garage? You can turn it off before putting it into park. I've done that at times.
Sponsored

 
 








Top