dozxab
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Dave
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2024
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 508
- Reaction score
- 1,489
- Location
- Prescott AZ
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 Ford Ranger XLT FX4, 2014 Jeep Wrangler JK
- Occupation
- Retired
Another thought on the subject. I remember reading that premium was good for 25 HP in the Ecoboost. Not sure it it was when I had my Mustang or the Ranger.
Edit: Just found this.
Go to Ford's website right now and check out the Mustang EcoBoost Fastback, and the site will tell you that the 'Stang delivers 315 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque. Then click on the little citations next to those numbers, and you'll get a message that reads, "Horsepower and torque ratings based on premium fuel per SAE J1349® standard." After that, go to the owner's manual to find assurance that your Mustang EcoBoost's engine was designed to run on 87. At a glance, it feels like EcoBoost owners are being pulled in two directions, and forums are full of confusion on the matter.
Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1899452/ford-ecoboosts-dont-need-premium-fuel-reason-explained/
Edit: Just found this.
Go to Ford's website right now and check out the Mustang EcoBoost Fastback, and the site will tell you that the 'Stang delivers 315 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque. Then click on the little citations next to those numbers, and you'll get a message that reads, "Horsepower and torque ratings based on premium fuel per SAE J1349® standard." After that, go to the owner's manual to find assurance that your Mustang EcoBoost's engine was designed to run on 87. At a glance, it feels like EcoBoost owners are being pulled in two directions, and forums are full of confusion on the matter.
Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1899452/ford-ecoboosts-dont-need-premium-fuel-reason-explained/
Sponsored