TJC
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Tony
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2020
- Threads
- 47
- Messages
- 4,095
- Reaction score
- 10,402
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 93 Miata, 05 Ranger 4x4, 20 Ranger 4x4, 23 CX-5
I don't think that statement is absolutely true.Yes, I am sure. There are other threads here that discuss it in detail. Its function is to calculate the battery state of charge. One reason is to make sure the battery has enough charge to restart the engine if ASS has stopped it. If there is not enough battery charge, it disables Auto Start Stop. But it also is used to control the charging rate of the battery. When you unplug the BMS, the state of charge can no longer be known.
My research showed me that when the sensor was unplugged, the BMS defaulted to a charging system very much like the one in 2005 Ranger.
I monitored both trucks under identical conditions watching charging behaviors and the only difference between the two was that the unplugged 2020 Ranger charged the battery at 0.2v higher than the 2005 Ranger. The charge patterns were identical. That extra 0.2v I attributed to the 2020 algos being tuned for AGM vs standard flooded batteries that came with my 2005 Ranger.
I drove both trucks the same route(a 40 mile circuit with a stop at the 20 mile mark for 30 minutes) during the day and at night, one right after the other so weather conditions would be close. I watched both voltage and amperage. Both batteries were extremely healthy with 100% SOC and 100% SOH, and had sub 3.5milliOhm internal resistance. Those are pretty impressive numbers for 6 and 7 year old batteries.
My goal was to validate what was happening when the sensor was unplugged. I have since plugged it back in and set SOH to 100%. I'm not sure I'm going to leave it as it is. I can see the advanced BMS doing it's thing, but the SOC target setting drifts lower over time... and I think it is not intentional. I think there is an error in the firmware.
Sponsored
Last edited: