Ford’s Recall Problem Is Getting Too Big to Ignore

[Jason B]

Yep, many recalls from Ford. Seems like a lot of S/W issues.
But at least they are not telling you to use heavier oil to mitigate engine defects (until warranty runs out).

Sponsored

 

[Sojourner]

This isn't the good old lead frame speed sensor issue again? We had recalls for that over here 10 years ago on the 6R80 boxes, due to lead frame and speed sensor faults causing the truck to suddenly downshift without warning to 1st or 2nd, even at highway speeds. Ford replaced the faulty parts FOC but I would have wanted an entire new transmission / drive train after an episode like that.

Yes, it's the lead frame. And I had that downshift happen on a high-speed road. Bam! Limp mode.

Sorry, but this tranny problem is unacceptable. Lead frame, CDU, rough shift patterns. What a mess.

I don't think there's anything or anybody that/who can persuade me that Farley is anything other than a colossal overpaid train wreck.

 

[Cmar]

Yep, many recalls from Ford. Seems like a lot of S/W issues.
But at least they are not telling you to use heavier oil to mitigate engine defects (until warranty runs out).

Ha Ha GM did that over here a few years ago when Holden (local GM branch dealers) told Colorado truck owners to just shift to a heavier weight oil when many of their brand new 2.8 diesel utes began to use oil, some alarmingly so, soon after purchase. Obviously their "low friction rings" were so low friction, that maybe they didn't scrape the oil at all! Or else the engines were engineered for a heavier oil in mind originally, and GM decided to change the engineers recommendations to make fuel economy look better. Switching oils did fix the issue in most cases.

 

[Friday yet?]

It just goes to show you how incredibly poorly these companies have been managed... "betting" on regulation is not a good business strategy, IMO.

I can't believe Farley is still CEO honestly. Whqt is even scarier is that these CEOs who run companies into the ground end up being CEOs of OTHER companies - why on earth does anyone hire a CEO who was a complete failure?

Getting off my soap box now.

Makes me more angry that when they fire one of these idiots they have to pay them millions to go away. Whereas a working stiff gets fired and it’s “Don’t let the door hit you…”

 

[Colo_Ranger]

Makes me more angry that when they fire one of these idiots they have to pay them millions to go away. Whereas a working stiff gets fired and it’s “Don’t let the door hit you…”

I've always be baffled by giving two weeks notice. Employers fire employees on the spot, why can't employees fire employers on the spot?

 

[Friday yet?]

I've always be baffled by giving two weeks notice. Employers fire employees on the spot, why can't employees fire employers on the spot?

100%!!!!!

 

[Dr_Strangelove]

Gen 6 Ranger recall over improperly installed wiring harness leading to fires.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/recalls/2026/04/22/ford-recalls-vehicles-ranger/89730670007/

 

[AzScorpion]

Gen 6 Ranger recall over improperly installed wiring harness leading to fires.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/recalls/2026/04/22/ford-recalls-vehicles-ranger/89730670007/

Who and where are all these parts being subbed out to? You'd think after the first couple BILLION in losses they'd get their sh!t together and find a competent contractor. It has to be costing them more to fix all these recalls than if they had just done it right in the first place!

That's one thing I always told my employees is to take the time to do it right the first time as it costs 2-3 times more to go back and fix things. I guarantee that if Farley had his pay (and bonuses) reduced for every recall they'd have a fix within days. SMH

 

[TxOTRRanger]

I've always be baffled by giving two weeks notice. Employers fire employees on the spot, why can't employees fire employers on the spot?

I can't tell you the number of times that thought has crossed my mind lol.
Well said btw.

 

[Chris M]

I've always be baffled by giving two weeks notice. Employers fire employees on the spot, why can't employees fire employers on the spot?

In AZ we can.

 

[Colo_Ranger]

In AZ we can.

There is no legal requirement for quitting on the spot. It's just a "socially acceptable standard". It "looks bad" to future employers.

What also gets me is "here is my two weeks notice" followed by "you need to leave now".

 

[Chris M]

There is no legal requirement for quitting on the spot. It's just a "socially acceptable standard". It "looks bad" to future employers.

What also gets me is "here is my two weeks notice" followed by "you need to leave now".

We are a so-called "right to work state", and every employer I've ever had here has pointed out ever so clearly that we could part ways without notice in either direction if we so choose.

And I agree that 2 weeks notice is the courteous thing to do, but some jobs/employers dont want you around once you give notice and they ask you to leave immediately. I suppose they do that to protect themselves from disgruntled employees damaging things on their way out.

I dont know if there's really any legality involved in all that.

 

[Colo_Ranger]

We are a so-called "right to work state", and every employer I've ever had here has pointed out ever so clearly that we could part ways without notice in either direction if we so choose.

And I agree that 2 weeks notice is the courteous thing to do, but some jobs/employers dont want you around once you give notice and they ask you to leave immediately. I suppose they do that to protect themselves from disgruntled employees damaging things on their way out.

I dont know if there's really any legality involved in all that.

I've always said that, if there is an expectation of two week notice, I should be paid for two weeks whether they allow me to work or not. I don't care if you don't want me there but pay me for the notice. Give me the courtesy I gave you. I am counting on that pay.

That's also why I don't give notice anymore. I need the money so I work until I don't.

 

[AzScorpion]

Talk about all your eggs in one basket. I never realized that the F150 was 90% of Fords profit. I knew the percentage was up there and it was their "bread and butter' but 90% of profit is a scary high margin for any industry to bank on with one unit.

Why Ford's Most Profitable Vehicle Sales Are on Fire -- and Not in a Good Way

https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/why-fords-most-profitable-vehicle-202500876.html

90% of profit? Really?
Ford manufactures roughly 20 distinct vehicle models globally, although it seems like more considering regionalization of vehicle designs and premium variations, or performance models. Understanding that those 20-ish models generate millions of sales across the world annually, it's difficult to fathom that the F-150 could generate most of the company's profits.

That's exactly what Morgan Stanley estimated way back in 2012 -- and don't kid yourself, not much has changed in the F-Series' ability to haul in big bucks. In 2012, Morgan Stanley estimated 90% of the company's global profits came from the truck, which is primarily sold only in North America.

That's simply all context to explain just how important the F-Series is for Ford and its investors. Unfortunately, the company is still recovering from a fire at a supplier's plant seven months ago that disrupted production of aluminum for the bodies of F-Series trucks and SUVs. Then a second fire at the same plant in November created a speed bump to recovery.

One example of the real-world impact is found in an Automotive News report about a dealership in Kansas City, Missouri, that is less than 20 miles away from the F-150 plant. The dealership said that March generally kicks off the spring selling season -- an important one for trucks -- with deals and incentives to further drive demand. In a typical year, the dealership would start with roughly 70 of Ford's highly valuable trucks, but this year it has nine.

Not only is that a significant problem, which could cost Ford up to $2 billion in total, but also the delayed recovery is going to be uneven with the auto company making up more lost volume during the second half of 2026. Investors are already seeing the impact, with F-Series sales declining 16% in the U.S. during the first quarter, compared to the prior year. Rivals GM posted Silverado sales as roughly flat, while the Ram truck of Stellantis soared 25% higher.

 

[JohnnyO]

Thing is, I'd normally be buying a new one right now but I'm afraid a 2026 won't be as reliable as my 2020 that I've had virtually no problems with. Plus they quit making Supercabs.

Sponsored