Blmpkn
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #16
Big-ish progress day on the ol gal today.
I decided that just building it a new exhaust from its factory header to the rear wasn't going to be enough work... so I decided to go full ham and get some shiny new mid-tubes to compliment what i was already planning ?
The header is listed as fitting 74-80 pintos and 82-92 rangers.. but fits a 96 most excellently.. with the exception of no EGR provision. Not a big deal.
The job wasn't exactly easy.. but also not terrible. Removal of the alternator bracket was necessary to wiggle it in there.. and had the side effect of causing some coolant fitting to lose its fitment and dump my rusty "coolant" all over the floor... oh well. There are worse things to bitch about.
Also found out that the mating surface of my coilpacks have definitely seen better days.. thanks salt-belt! Probably be a good idea to replace them.
With any luck.. I'll be able to build the rest of its exhaust next weekend. I'll be reducing the 3" collector down to 2.25" > universal hi-flow cat > canister muffler > piped out to the stock location.
I would of purchased 2.5" or 3" diameter stuff for the remainder of the exhaust if I knew I was going to be putting an aftermarket header on it... but me being me decided to change course after I had already bought all the 2.25" stuff ?‍
?‍
These motors respond extremely well to simple changes to the intake/exhaust...
In 96+97 the 2.3 made an entire 112 hp and 124 ft lbs from the factory.. all this exhaust work should** put me close to 130hp and 135 ft lbs. Longtubes and 3" exhaust stuff would of been ideal and put me up over 150/150.. mabey in the future!
** honestly.. with 218k miles on the odo and with the amount of blowby the thing has... all this exhaust work MIGHT bring it back to its factory power output... at best ?..
... but.... gains are gains BRO ?
I decided that just building it a new exhaust from its factory header to the rear wasn't going to be enough work... so I decided to go full ham and get some shiny new mid-tubes to compliment what i was already planning ?
The header is listed as fitting 74-80 pintos and 82-92 rangers.. but fits a 96 most excellently.. with the exception of no EGR provision. Not a big deal.
The job wasn't exactly easy.. but also not terrible. Removal of the alternator bracket was necessary to wiggle it in there.. and had the side effect of causing some coolant fitting to lose its fitment and dump my rusty "coolant" all over the floor... oh well. There are worse things to bitch about.
Also found out that the mating surface of my coilpacks have definitely seen better days.. thanks salt-belt! Probably be a good idea to replace them.
With any luck.. I'll be able to build the rest of its exhaust next weekend. I'll be reducing the 3" collector down to 2.25" > universal hi-flow cat > canister muffler > piped out to the stock location.
I would of purchased 2.5" or 3" diameter stuff for the remainder of the exhaust if I knew I was going to be putting an aftermarket header on it... but me being me decided to change course after I had already bought all the 2.25" stuff ?‍
These motors respond extremely well to simple changes to the intake/exhaust...
In 96+97 the 2.3 made an entire 112 hp and 124 ft lbs from the factory.. all this exhaust work should** put me close to 130hp and 135 ft lbs. Longtubes and 3" exhaust stuff would of been ideal and put me up over 150/150.. mabey in the future!
** honestly.. with 218k miles on the odo and with the amount of blowby the thing has... all this exhaust work MIGHT bring it back to its factory power output... at best ?..
... but.... gains are gains BRO ?
Sponsored