SFB
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Daniel
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 319
- Reaction score
- 531
- Location
- Fullerton California
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Ranger Crew XLT Sport Black on Black with Magnetic trim, package 302A
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
When Ford went to more aluminum they got heat for it, as for the unibody design, well the original Mustang was unibody, and I think current too! Does this make it any less a car? That said, aircraft are unibody, aircraft are also aluminum and some today plastic! 787 Dreamliner is plastic. I’ve flown plenty, in many types. If unibodies are strong enough for aircraft and aluminum too then I’m sure it’s good enough for cars or trucks. I consider it a pickup or small truck if it has a bed. My 2CDiscussion topic for the group. There seems to be a lot of hate for the Maverick/Santa Cruz/Ridgeline and statements that they are not 'Real' trucks. A lot of these statements are followed by a comment about the unibody design. I have several questions if y'all are willing to indulge me.
1: Is the unibody design the only reason these vehicles should not be considered 'Real Trucks'?
- If your answer is no, please flesh out the other reasons. I have my own for these specific vehicles as well.
2: If yes, in your mind, how does a unibody design disqualify these vehicles from being trucks (Truck = Ladder frame and nothing else ever)?
3: What if a truck comes along with huge payload, towing, & off-road numbers and is unibody, would you still not consider it a 'real truck'?
4: If all things were the same with the current and beloved 5G ranger, but it was unibody, would it still be a real truck and would you have still bought it?
I'm interested in everyone's opinions and how these opinions came to be.
Sponsored
