Sponsored

New SUV Recall :(

Chris M

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 11, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
19,766
Location
Surprise, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ranger XLT Sport 4X4
Occupation
Security Supervisor

Rp930

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
3,514
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
‘19 Ford Ranger Lariat, ‘23 Macan,’21 Shelby GT500
Occupation
Retired
Somebody needs to recall the management at the Ford Motor Company, just sayin ?
Why? Do you think Ford manufactures the injector? Just another vendor and something went wrong.
 

rydfree

Well-Known Member
First Name
Benny
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
985
Reaction score
3,689
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger FX4 Super crew Lariet - Mercedes GLK
Occupation
Maintenance
Vehicle Showcase
1


AzScorpion

Moderator
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Threads
335
Messages
26,239
Reaction score
132,127
Location
Back Home In AZ!
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Ranger Tremor
Occupation
Retired...Full Time Slacker
With all these shortages it's just another sourced out part that was defective.
 

YaBoiNewton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
457
Reaction score
1,001
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2019 XLT supercrew Sport FX4, 2008 Bullitt w Saleen Supercharger
Occupation
Automotive Engineer
Vehicle Showcase
1
It's crazy that we still have these fire risks in new vehicles in 2022. They've been catching on fire since they were invented and show no signs of slowing down, even with EVs!
The auto industry is so fast and pushy that I would be amazed if any vehicle launched without a recall. Sure you want to consider all possible failures in development, but at the end of the day you can't think of everything and you have to sell product eventually! Lots of salaries depend on engineering teams producing designs.

I spent years finishing a development project only to spend the past two years correcting designs because new failures I never considered popped up. I tried to cover everything, but stuff happens once other people start testing your product. I'm just fortunate everything was caught well before the customer SOP and not during crash tests!
 

Texasota

Well-Known Member
First Name
Al
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
3,492
Location
Rochester, MN
Vehicle(s)
2026 Ranger XLT, 2023 Escape PHEV
It's crazy that we still have these fire risks in new vehicles in 2022. They've been catching on fire since they were invented and show no signs of slowing down, even with EVs!
Gasoline under high pressure. What could possibly go wrong? ?
 

Trigganometry

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Threads
153
Messages
5,833
Reaction score
25,359
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
20 XLT scab 301A/tow 4X4 magnetic w/sport blackout
Occupation
Engineering
In a way I’m somewhat surprised something like this fails. Ford is an ISO company. The amount of testing that has to happen through design, prototypes, and then 4 rounds of qualifying and passing to a 1.33 CPK to prove the chances of defect at the smallest possible margins. Then the vendors that make them have to go through the same process and prove their manufacturing methods are robust and repeatable. The cherry on top is total traceability from raw materials to each lot/batch made and each person that touched them during manufacturing is recorded along with relevant output data. In todays world the proof these methods work is the longevity of engines and other power train parts. Seems some vendors need a review of their quality standards as they’re taking shortcuts for profit!
 

UnregistredHypercam2

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jon
Joined
Aug 15, 2021
Threads
22
Messages
282
Reaction score
907
Location
Denver, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
1997 Toyota Land Cruiser VX Limited, 2013 Chevrolet Suburban LT
Occupation
Cybersecurity
I work in the cybersecurity industry and this is equally a concern for us. Due to widely dispersed supply chains, supplier risk management is the name of the game. For us it isn't engine fires, it's data that we share with them.
 

Deleted member 15875

In a way I’m somewhat surprised something like this fails. Ford is an ISO company. The amount of testing that has to happen through design, prototypes, and then 4 rounds of qualifying and passing to a 1.33 CPK to prove the chances of defect at the smallest possible margins. Then the vendors that make them have to go through the same process and prove their manufacturing methods are robust and repeatable. The cherry on top is total traceability from raw materials to each lot/batch made and each person that touched them during manufacturing is recorded along with relevant output data. In todays world the proof these methods work is the longevity of engines and other power train parts. Seems some vendors need a review of their quality standards as they’re taking shortcuts for profit!
Curious....I've worked for ISO orgs in the past and understand the rigor intimately, but with supply chains breaking down the last two years, OEM's had to scramble to identify alternate suppliers. I have a family member that ordered his Ford over a year ago and still no line of sight for example. So when vendors swtich suppliers on the fly, are they still following standard ISO testing protocols?
 

Trigganometry

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Threads
153
Messages
5,833
Reaction score
25,359
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
20 XLT scab 301A/tow 4X4 magnetic w/sport blackout
Occupation
Engineering
Curious....I've worked for ISO orgs in the past and understand the rigor intimately, but with supply chains breaking down the last two years, OEM's had to scramble to identify alternate suppliers. I have a family member that ordered his Ford over a year ago and still no line of sight for example. So when vendors swtich suppliers on the fly, are they still following standard ISO testing protocols?
Should be but.. to your point second sources should be paramount with a company like Ford. That way your top tier supplier doesn’t hold you over the barrel beating you down with price increases and delivery demands. Should be at least 3 deep in the supply chain for qualified vendors all supplying the same inventory
 

Deleted member 15875

Should be but.. to your point second sources should be paramount with a company like Ford. That way your top tier supplier doesn’t hold you over the barrel beating you down with price increases and delivery demands. Should be at least 3 deep in the supply chain for qualified vendors all supplying the same inventory
CFO's are desperately trying to regain control of costs and improve profitability, but chips are still a big problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

P. A. Schilke

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Threads
149
Messages
7,083
Reaction score
37,187
Location
GV Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
Occupation
Engineer Retired
Vehicle Showcase
1
The auto industry is so fast and pushy that I would be amazed if any vehicle launched without a recall. Sure you want to consider all possible failures in development, but at the end of the day you can't think of everything and you have to sell product eventually! Lots of salaries depend on engineering teams producing designs.

I spent years finishing a development project only to spend the past two years correcting designs because new failures I never considered popped up. I tried to cover everything, but stuff happens once other people start testing your product. I'm just fortunate everything was caught well before the customer SOP and not during crash tests!
Ever heard of FMEA?

Phil
Sponsored

 
 








Top