Dave1899
Well-Known Member
And that's what happened to the Dakota...And the next generation will even be bigger
Sponsored
And that's what happened to the Dakota...And the next generation will even be bigger
Yes, I think it is important to know what we need and then put that first in selection. I don't need F151 or bigger truck and I don't see many using all that power. Ranger was the perfect fit for me.The size and the mpg is what's appealing to me.
Well, I say mpg but I don't drive that much as my Ranger that I picked up in Dec 2019 just now turned over 14k miles.
The Ranger is actually bigger than what I need, but with that said I have once used my Ranger to tow more than the Maverick max.
If I need something bigger I have friends with Super Duty and 3500 GM trucks.
I saw my first Maverick "in the wild" yesterday, also in black, and it really did look good. Still, the Ranger is the right size for us, the F150 is too big, and the Mav is too small. Cool, but too small!Not really surprised, the wait was gonna be a few months longer if I went with a Maverick instead of a Ranger. I knew they would sell like hot cakes lol.
I really do think they look good, just not quite big enough for me.
Ford missed a chance.. The 2019 Rangers should be Called F-100's and the new Maverick should be called ranger. The new ranger is almost identical in length and height as the old ranger.The size and the mpg is what's appealing to me.
Well, I say mpg but I don't drive that much as my Ranger that I picked up in Dec 2019 just now turned over 14k miles.
The Ranger is actually bigger than what I need, but with that said I have once used my Ranger to tow more than the Maverick max.
If I need something bigger I have friends with Super Duty and 3500 GM trucks.
Maverick should have been called Courier. When i hear Maverick i think the carFord missed a chance.. The 2019 Rangers should be Called F-100's and the new Maverick should be called ranger. The new ranger is almost identical in length and height as the old ranger.