Sponsored

775HP and 18/24 MPG?

Bowser123

New Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 21, 2026
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Gladiator
Occupation
Technician
To go further you can get a diesel tank. Check this out it holds 116 US gallon and battery powered.

It helped with my Ford which just drank the oil lol
Sponsored

 

Griswald

Active Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Sep 18, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
93
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2021 FX4
Occupation
Retired
It's just truly sad that my 1992 Ranger got 22 mpg and after 25 years of improvements and development, new Rangers still only get 22 mpg.

That's just wrong.
 

TruckBox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
95
Reaction score
176
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2022 XLT
Occupation
Hired Nerd
It's just truly sad that my 1992 Ranger got 22 mpg and after 25 years of improvements and development, new Rangers still only get 22 mpg.

That's just wrong.
The G5 tows more, makes more power, is heavier, larger, arguably more capable... and makes the same or - in most cases - better mileage than that gen.

It does suck that there's not an equivalent sized truck of the 1st-3rd gen available. Even the Maverick is larger... which gets much better mileage and only loses in the towing category.
 
OP
OP
got3fords

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
132
Messages
5,391
Reaction score
14,106
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional
It's just truly sad that my 1992 Ranger got 22 mpg and after 25 years of improvements and development, new Rangers still only get 22 mpg.

That's just wrong.
Not with the massive increase in HP. Imagine, doubling the horsepower or better, with no less, and sometimes better MPG.
Sponsored

 
 








Top