woodworker
Well-Known Member
Well, again my opinion, the stations I worked at here in Virginia were built and put on line on 72 and 73 for SPS anyway. From what I remember, they were built for like $450 million dollars. So yes, they are pretty much cash cows compared to what they would cost to build today. They have had two life extensions as I remember and are going through major renovations in the next few years to upgrade steam generators, turbines, and other major equipment.As someone who has worked in the industry, I'd be interested in your views on whether nuclear power is actually cost effective in the totality. ie not just how cheap the power is when a station is running well, but if you look at the total cost to build, run, waste disposal, and decommissioning and clean up, are they actually cost effective in the long term? Or do they ultimately use more energy than they produce.
So, older stations like this, yes, they are well worth the while to operate and maintain. As far as the newer stations, Iām not sure but I assume they will eventually pay for themselves in a few lifetimes. I was following the SMR development for awhile but most likely will not happen in my lifetime.
Hope this answers you questions.
Sponsored