Sponsored

Ford sides with CA in Court Case Challenging emission rules

Shoran12

Well-Known Member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
645
Reaction score
1,682
Location
Maryville TN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ranger STX
Occupation
Millwright
OP
OP
dtech

dtech

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
3,143
Reaction score
7,613
Location
colorado
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat FX4, chromed and forever damperless
So they’re siding with more regulation? Must have a lot invested in the EV market I guess or an image to maintain.
That and of course Jim Farley's job, the challenge by 17 states in court might get interesting and eventually wind up at the Supreme Court to decide, CA's creating their own emissions standards was challenged and upheld some yrs back in court, but times have changed. I'm an advocate of EVs mostly because of their efficiency but as many have pointed out there are not for everyone and with the cost of lith-ion batts adversely affecting their pricing EVs won't be widely accepted without gov subsidies - which are so dependent on who rules the roost in D.C.
 

P. A. Schilke

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Threads
149
Messages
7,083
Reaction score
37,188
Location
GV Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
Occupation
Engineer Retired
Vehicle Showcase
1
That and of course Jim Farley's job, the challenge by 17 states in court might get interesting and eventually wind up at the Supreme Court to decide, CA's creating their own emissions standards was challenged and upheld some yrs back in court, but times have changed. I'm an advocate of EVs mostly because of their efficiency but as many have pointed out there are not for everyone and with the cost of lith-ion batts adversely affecting their pricing EVs won't be widely accepted without gov subsidies - which are so dependent on who rules the roost in D.C.
Hi DT,

The empire CARB has built up over time would see massive layoffs if the Ruling were to let the EPA govern all of the USA's automotive emission regulations. This is a sad situation in that the laid off staff would leave the state and Arizona will be diluted with these peoples politics.

Best,
Phil
 


Shoran12

Well-Known Member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
645
Reaction score
1,682
Location
Maryville TN
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ranger STX
Occupation
Millwright
Hi DT,

The empire CARB has built up over time would see massive layoffs if the Ruling were to let the EPA govern all of the USA's automotive emission regulations. This is a sad situation in that the laid off staff would leave the state and Arizona will be diluted with these peoples politics.

Best,
Phil
Phil, I would be really curious to hear your thoughts on these regulatory agencies CARB, CAFE, EPA and whoever else has their hand in the pot regulating vehicle manufacturers from your engineering standpoint. I imagine it’s just nightmare trying to cope with all this while still providing people reliable vehicles at decent costs. I understand if you may not want to get into it but it would be interesting to hear from someone rather experienced in that industry and an engineer dealing with these issues at that. With my experience I can only really speak on the nuclear industry and the auto industry is very foreign to me.
 
OP
OP
dtech

dtech

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
3,143
Reaction score
7,613
Location
colorado
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat FX4, chromed and forever damperless
Hi DT,

The empire CARB has built up over time would see massive layoffs if the Ruling were to let the EPA govern all of the USA's automotive emission regulations. This is a sad situation in that the laid off staff would leave the state and Arizona will be diluted with these peoples politics.

Best,
Phil
Did a little reading on CARB - and all told 15 states (inc CA) have adopted the CARB standards - but some I think with respect to only autos as CARB at least in CA sets rules for gas powered lawnmowers, generators, etc. All other states are bound by EPA regulations, so it might well be an interesting court battle to see what entity comes out on top. So yes there is a lot more to CARB than just CA, CO is one of the adopting states with respect to autos but discussions have started here about outlawing the sale of small gas engines. As far as I can tell though CA is the only state that the EPA has granted a waiver allowing them to set their own standards.
 
Last edited:

P. A. Schilke

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Threads
149
Messages
7,083
Reaction score
37,188
Location
GV Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger FX4 Lariat 4x4, 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, 2005 Alfa Motorhome
Occupation
Engineer Retired
Vehicle Showcase
1
Phil, I would be really curious to hear your thoughts on these regulatory agencies CARB, CAFE, EPA and whoever else has their hand in the pot regulating vehicle manufacturers from your engineering standpoint. I imagine it’s just nightmare trying to cope with all this while still providing people reliable vehicles at decent costs. I understand if you may not want to get into it but it would be interesting to hear from someone rather experienced in that industry and an engineer dealing with these issues at that. With my experience I can only really speak on the nuclear industry and the auto industry is very foreign to me.
Hi Shane,

Boy could I write a book about this regulatory aspect of automotive regulations, but too much to contain here on these forums. Forum member KJ has tried to capture back stories I have written which include some regulatory experiences. I was in Light Truck Engineering for most of my career but was involved directly with CARB on loan to Automotive Emissions and Fuel Economy Office for 3 years as I was a mechanic while going to college and then an engineer... a bit rare combination at the time. These backstories are here:

https://www.ranger5g.com/forum/threads/p-a-schilke-back-stories.18745/

So here is a brief summary of a broad brush the are strictly my opinion..not necessarily Ford's position.

Safety standards: For the most part I concur. Every MFG has to comply...downside...increased cost of a vehicle but worth it to a point. I do not concur with protecting people that do not take responsibility for their own actions. Crash protection eg. Air Bags. People need to be belted in using safety belts they have to insert the metal buckle into the receiver... Protect for the non belted driver....BS! Too costly JMO.

EPA emissions/CAFE: These standards have helped produce vehicles that are EFI and DI now that would not have existed as we would still be using carburetors. A good thing as driveability and power are improved at the same time...But Cost to consumer is higher. Regulation of lawn mowers etc....BS. JMO.

CARB: Over the top Zealots. They should be disbanded in entirety as EPA has a more prudent approach. I have nothing kind to say about CARB.

So sorry...broadbrush in nature and just my opinion. Take these with a grain of salt or the whole salt shaker, eh?

Best,
Phil
 

MrBirdman330

Well-Known Member
First Name
Nathan
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
240
Reaction score
367
Location
Des Moines, IA
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger XL STX Special Edition
Occupation
Letter Carrier
So they’re siding with more regulation? Must have a lot invested in the EV market I guess or an image to maintain.
Trying to keep wind in their sails to stay on the winning side. Had things been different for the outcome of 2020 more than likely Ford would be siding with removing CARB. CARB is the reason we can't adopt a global emissions standard, which would reduce cost of new cars which is a good thing. But we can't because it might emit .00002kg more than CARB resulting in the death of one individual over a 30 year period.
 

Pinepig

Well-Known Member
First Name
Charlie
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
409
Reaction score
1,318
Location
Sacramento
Vehicle(s)
Last count was 12
Occupation
lol
CARB: Over the top Zealots. They should be disbanded in entirety as EPA has a more prudent approach. I have nothing kind to say about CARB.
Absolutely, if they actually gave a shit about pollutants they would allow anything for modifications as long as equal or less came out the tailpipe, as it is now to be an approved part the company has to pay an large fee to have their part tested to get the OK sticker.

They should also use fuel milage as a parameter, looking at VWs dieselgate here, the cars with the illegal programming got much better power/fuel milage. MPG is as big a part of tail pipe emissions as just the raw numbers coming out the tailpipe. They seem to ignore that quite a bit of pollution comes form getting the oil out of the ground and refining it.

CARB sucks, it's why I've always had several pre 1975 cars, no smog and no other tests. You can make/do pretty much whatever you want with them.
 

D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
While I'm not a fan of what they are doing in California. I fully support their right to do so.

Hard to not be political in thread like this. But States' Rights are important.

The Supremecy Clause only comes into play if a States' restrictions violate Constitutionally protected rights. A state cannot make laws that violate a person's enumerated rights. But it's not a right to be able to determine what powers a new vehicle.

I'm of the opinion that the EPA should be disbanded, personally. As environmental regulation is not a function of the Federal government.

Although, Ford and other automakers getting involved is rather aggravating.
 

MrBirdman330

Well-Known Member
First Name
Nathan
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
240
Reaction score
367
Location
Des Moines, IA
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger XL STX Special Edition
Occupation
Letter Carrier
While I'm not a fan of what they are doing in California. I fully support their right to do so.

Hard to not be political in thread like this. But States' Rights are important.

The Supremecy Clause only comes into play if a States' restrictions violate Constitutionally protected rights. A state cannot make laws that violate a person's enumerated rights. But it's not a right to be able to determine what powers a new vehicle.

I'm of the opinion that the EPA should be disbanded, personally. As environmental regulation is not a function of the Federal government.

Although, Ford and other automakers getting involved is rather aggravating.
Which I end up finding ironic because automakers have always complained about lack of uniform standards. EPA should be either disbanded or reworked from the ground up to be more sensible. I refuse to condone what VW did but it sent a message that diesel laws were too restricted and it hurt the US market. Don't get me started on NHTSA as they are so incompetent the US is still over 10 years behind the globe for lighting and safety. While we try to figure out how to retrofit air-bags in classic cars, Europe has some of the most advanced lighting. One simple law here is the problem and they won't have it repealed: High and low beam lights must be on a separate circuit.
 

LightningBlue

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Feb 12, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
279
Reaction score
385
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lightning Blue XLT FX4/ 2023 Subaru Forester
Vehicle Showcase
1
While I'm not a fan of what they are doing in California. I fully support their right to do so.

Hard to not be political in thread like this. But States' Rights are important.

The Supremecy Clause only comes into play if a States' restrictions violate Constitutionally protected rights. A state cannot make laws that violate a person's enumerated rights. But it's not a right to be able to determine what powers a new vehicle.

I'm of the opinion that the EPA should be disbanded, personally. As environmental regulation is not a function of the Federal government.

Although, Ford and other automakers getting involved is rather aggravating.
I understand your stance on states rights, however, CA has been shredding constitutional rights for decades. Nearly half of the state has no representation in government and thus no voice or power to block or introduce legislation. I think rest of the country believes all of California is supportive of it's ridiculous laws and policies but it's just not true. It's why so many people are leaving for other states, they've given up on being treated like a US Citizen. Unless you've lived here I doubt you'd really understand how restrictive nearly everything actually is. Everyone knows about the gun laws and ammunition background checks, I assume. Did you know you can't buy a catalytic converter yourself? You can't register a non California compliant vehicle like a Dual Sport or non CARB vehicle. You can't buy paint thinner (mineral spirits) or flavored tobacco. I could go on for ever. My point is at what point do you (not you in particular) start to care that we don't get the same rights as the rest of the country. It's a slippery slope as our crap policies usually spread.
 

D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
I understand your stance on states rights, however, CA has been shredding constitutional rights for decades. Nearly half of the state has no representation in government and thus no voice or power to block or introduce legislation. I think rest of the country believes all of California is supportive of it's ridiculous laws and policies but it's just not true. It's why so many people are leaving for other states, they've given up on being treated like a US Citizen. Unless you've lived here I doubt you'd really understand how restrictive nearly everything actually is. Everyone knows about the gun laws and ammunition background checks, I assume. Did you know you can't buy a catalytic converter yourself? You can't register a non California compliant vehicle like a Dual Sport or non CARB vehicle. You can't buy paint thinner (mineral spirits) or flavored tobacco. I could go on for ever. My point is at what point do you (not you in particular) start to care that we don't get the same rights as the rest of the country. It's a slippery slope as our crap policies usually spread.
My wife is from, and my in-laws still live in rural northern California.

I completely understand that freedom loving individuals in the state have their voices drowned out by those from the the cities. And I hear all about the regulatory hoops the residents are forced to jump through.

Odd thing is that in this instance the free market is putting the whole of the nation into the exact same with regards to automotive regulations.

Unfortunately, it's not my fight. I'm not a resident of California, and I'm busy trying to keep up with the Californication of Colorado's policies.

Perhaps the answer is right minded folks moving into CA as the others flee?
Sponsored

 
 








Top