IdahoRanger
Well-Known Member
Just think of all the heavy traffic backed up on questionable bridges.
They have not thought of the impact of having only EV's.
They have not thought of the impact of having only EV's.
Sponsored
One of the 1st things that came to my mind when they started all of the EV push .I guess I never thought much about the weight difference when in an accident with a lighter vehicle. The F-150 Lightning EV pickup is 2,000 to 3,000 pounds heavier than the same model’s combustion version. The Mustang Mach E electric SUV and the Volvo XC40 EV, she said, are roughly 33% heavier than their gasoline counterparts. Looks like something else they (you know who) forgot to think about before pushing these out.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-official-warns-risks-posed-200630606.html
Good foresight. You should be working for the NTSB Benny! ?One of the 1st things that came to my mind when they started all of the EV push .
https://www.ranger5g.com/forum/threads/ev.22033/post-486309
thats a sweet rig! million plus dollars i bet.This will show up if you call roadside assistance from your F150 Lightning…
![]()
The difference in a one ton is that it has brake and suspension capacity to haul 4000 pounds or tow 10 tons. So 95% of the time they are way under capacity. The Lightning is way closer to it's limits when empty.curb weight on the platinum lightning was 6855 pounds. The F350 crewcab diesel starts at over 7000 pounds. I'm way more scared by the F350 drivers.
![]()
My first thought. An acting official not following the narrative is more likely to get canned then her concerns listened to.how dare a person spread any truth about ev problems lol.
wonder how long he will be around...
![]()
This is a good point. Not only large bridges either.. theres a handful of backroad bridges in my area that are sign'ed for only a small handful of tons.. a lightning crossing those bridges in both directions would definitely overload them.Just think of all the heavy traffic backed up on questionable bridges.
They have not thought of the impact of having only EV's.
hmmm if this would become a problem I bet they would add software to force 20 feet gaps(or something like that) to disperse the weight. Which would of course cause other problems I'm sure...Just think of all the heavy traffic backed up on questionable bridges.
They have not thought of the impact of having only EV's.
As horrid as it sounds, I think we will need to give those EVs the right of way on those bridges, in essence they become one lane only , making the lighter ICE vehicles wait their turn (as their drivers fume). Wasn't there money allocated in the IRA to get those one lane signs posted , I think the larger "build back better package" had monies earmarked for construction of new EV only bridges, a form of auto segregation but alas it failed to become law.This is a good point. Not only large bridges either.. theres a handful of backroad bridges in my area that are sign'ed for only a small handful of tons.. a lightning crossing those bridges in both directions would definitely overload them.