Sponsored

Thing about a twin turbo

Doc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Doc
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Threads
94
Messages
5,769
Reaction score
23,244
Location
Live oak fla
Vehicle(s)
2026 5.0 Mustang GT, 2024 Ranger STX
Occupation
Retired
That’s thinking,
Stock turbo bottom end turbonetix top end..
any Ideas?
Regards
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

PNW_Ranger87

Well-Known Member
First Name
Erik
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
551
Reaction score
674
Location
Renton, WA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT 4X4
Occupation
Parts Specialist
Why not just big turbo? It would be way easier... It sounds like you're thinking about sequential turbos. Hmmm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc


OP
OP
Doc

Doc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Doc
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Threads
94
Messages
5,769
Reaction score
23,244
Location
Live oak fla
Vehicle(s)
2026 5.0 Mustang GT, 2024 Ranger STX
Occupation
Retired
Why not just big turbo? It would be way easier... It sounds like you're thinking about sequential turbos. Hmmm.
Because a bigger turbo will not spool up as fast as the stock turbo..sequential, yes..
Regards
 

outdoorphotog

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ian
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Healdsburg, CA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lincoln Navigator L
Occupation
Limo Driver
The ranger turbo is small, but is kind of torquey and fun to drive. Would be fun to put a bigger turbo on, some injectors and a moon tune... ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

ColoRanger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cody
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Threads
8
Messages
84
Reaction score
109
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger
I would think the hardest part is going to be adapting the electronic controlled waste gate to function the way it needs to for bringing on the atmospheric, while maintaining a healthy and durable drive pressure.
main points that I would dig into-
-what are running out of first right now, fuel or air?
-what cfm is the head/engine capable of moving? Ie: is a compound/sequential setup overkill air?
-charger sizing, as well as wastegate for atmosphere? Too small would create negative drive pressure ration especially on the small factory. Too big would put the additional cfm and benefit of the atmo passed the working rpm of the 4 cyl.
I love the idea and think it would be awesome.luckily being electronic wastegate tuning can help, but it will be interesting to see it work and be worth while.
 

outdoorphotog

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ian
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Healdsburg, CA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lincoln Navigator L
Occupation
Limo Driver
I wonder what model this existing turbo is to see what the specs are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

ColoRanger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cody
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Threads
8
Messages
84
Reaction score
109
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger
I would look at possibly removing the electronic wastegate controlling system (through tuning should be able to). Utilize the turbo mount from full race
https://www.full-race.com/store/bor...ies/ford-ecoboost-2-3l-t4-efr-turbo-manifold/
Then go with an internally wastegated EFR charger small frame with similar compressor sizing as factory (will still flow way better). Then go with a small 300 frame as the atmospheric. Maybe a 363 or 364.5? In SXE form they are super efficient and will spool great. If not maybe a 6266 precision on top of the EFR. Or dual precision’s even? Once you utilize that turbo mount, possibilities are pretty endless (barring tuning limitations)
I would think maybe an XDI HPFP to be able to run enough fuel for some E85 could support the air?
 

outdoorphotog

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ian
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Healdsburg, CA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lincoln Navigator L
Occupation
Limo Driver
I would look at possibly removing the electronic wastegate controlling system (through tuning should be able to). Utilize the turbo mount from full race
https://www.full-race.com/store/bor...ies/ford-ecoboost-2-3l-t4-efr-turbo-manifold/
Then go with an internally wastegated EFR charger small frame with similar compressor sizing as factory (will still flow way better). Then go with a small 300 frame as the atmospheric. Maybe a 363 or 364.5? In SXE form they are super efficient and will spool great. If not maybe a 6266 precision on top of the EFR. Or dual precision’s even? Once you utilize that turbo mount, possibilities are pretty endless (barring tuning limitations)
I would think maybe an XDI HPFP to be able to run enough fuel for some E85 could support the air?
Externally gated is the way to go of you want to hold high boost. I just don't understand how much "tuning" is required per additional modification parts to enable high boost, I am only an OBD1 tuner with a mechanical waste-gate.
 

ColoRanger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cody
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Threads
8
Messages
84
Reaction score
109
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger
Externally gated is the way to go of you want to hold high boost. I just don't understand how much "tuning" is required per additional modification parts to enable high boost, I am only an OBD1 tuner with a mechanical waste-gate.
Correct, typically external will be best for high boost. But with overall efficiency of those EFR’s, and the real estate that is gained/saved in engine compartment from running it, it would be a good high pressure option.
Plus trying to find a way/room to externally wastegate the high pressure, being as there is no manifold since it is a part of the head, would be tough. You wouldn’t be able to modify the Full-Race mount and add the external gate, because being a twin volute setup which runs independently from each exhaust valve, you would actually have to run a riser(betweenT4 mount and turbo) with wastegate in it. Doing an external on these for a high pressure would be difficult.
 

outdoorphotog

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ian
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Threads
21
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Healdsburg, CA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lincoln Navigator L
Occupation
Limo Driver
Correct, typically external will be best for high boost. But with overall efficiency of those EFR’s, and the real estate that is gained/saved in engine compartment from running it, it would be a good high pressure option.
Plus trying to find a way/room to externally wastegate the high pressure, being as there is no manifold since it is a part of the head, would be tough. You wouldn’t be able to modify the Full-Race mount and add the external gate, because being a twin volute setup which runs independently from each exhaust valve, you would actually have to run a riser(betweenT4 mount and turbo) with wastegate in it. Doing an external on these for a high pressure would be difficult.
Manifold is part of the head... haha. What will they think of next
Sponsored

 
 








Top