Danny15l
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #16
Yes you could have not explained it any clearer.Keep in mind that every joint is going to have a torque-to value, and then a residual torque value, typically about 30% lower than the applied torque. That initial torque is with a brand new fastener, and if the fastener is selected correctly, is going to stretch when you hit that final torque number, holding everything tightly together. It takes more energy to stretch it that first time, thus why residual torque numbers are lower than torque values. Also, the torque spec is typically +/- 15%, so a 41ft-lbs nominal is actually 34.85-47.15ft-lbs. And taking a 30% reduction for residual, and you'd expect the fastener to be 24.4-33ft-lbs.
Im sorry to hear about that! yeah I’ve been the same since ever since les Schwab forgot to forgot to install Cam bolts with my new upper control arms. Driving in the winter at that time was crazy.. No issue in checking the work of other people. Especially when the mechanics/technicians are only 20 yos. I deal all kinds of quality assurance stuff at work. I work in manufacturing that deals with products going into peoples bodies. You could think of the safety measures that come with the job… quality control issues as well.Few years back I had Mavis do a tire rotation on a Subaru I was driving. Pulled into my garage, slammed the door and a lug nut fell off onto the garage floor. Now I do my own rotations and if I take any vehicle anywhere where they need to take my wheels off for any reason I retorque immediately when I get home.
Sponsored