Spark Plugs - NGK Equal?

Zetterbeard

Well-Known Member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
124
Reaction score
112
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2020 FORD RANGER XLT 4X4
Vehicle Showcase
1
Just to confirm, the M-12405-35T plugs do fit the 2.3L in the Ranger gaped at .026? Just want to double check before purchasing.
Sponsored

 

HoosierT

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tyler
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
959
Reaction score
1,540
Location
Fishers, IN
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜19 Ranger Lariat FX4, '17 Explorer Sport
Just to confirm, the M-12405-35T plugs do fit the 2.3L in the Ranger gaped at .026? Just want to double check before purchasing.
Yep! They fit and the truck is running super well. Had them in for about 200 miles so far.
 

Engmus

Well-Known Member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
75
Reaction score
100
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
19 Ranger Lariat
Occupation
Information Technology
I went in another direction and picked up NGK 95605 LTR7BHX Ruthenium HX Plug , which should be one step colder Ruthenium style NGK's.

I"ll let you guys know how it goes when I get them installed.
 

HoosierT

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tyler
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
959
Reaction score
1,540
Location
Fishers, IN
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜19 Ranger Lariat FX4, '17 Explorer Sport
I went in another direction and picked up NGK 95605 LTR7BHX Ruthenium HX Plug , which should be one step colder Ruthenium style NGK's.

I"ll let you guys know how it goes when I get them installed.
The only issue I see is the .043 gap, The most allowable gap change that NGK supports is .008, so the smallest gap you'll get to is .035. That very likely to cause spark blowout and a slight loss in performance. Stock gap is .030 and recommended tuned gap is .026-.028.
 

Engmus

Well-Known Member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
75
Reaction score
100
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
19 Ranger Lariat
Occupation
Information Technology
The only issue I see is the .043 gap, The most allowable gap change that NGK supports is .008, so the smallest gap you'll get to is .035. That very likely to cause spark blowout and a slight loss in performance. Stock gap is .030 and recommended tuned gap is .026-.028.
You aren't wrong, i'll likely gap them down to .27 some of the Fiesta and Focus guys have been doing that with no issue.
 


Lazz

New Member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger Super Crew FX4
Occupation
Lumper
Nah, extensive research indicates that not only do these not have iridium in the straps (aka not double iridium like the motocraft), but they also don't perform as well according to testing by multiple EB tuners. Additionally, gapping the 6510's to .026 is going beyond the recommended allowable gapping from NGK. Ending up finding out that the 542s, being one step colder, were likely superseded due to emissions and replaced with a normal temp plug. As such, they moved these plugs to their ford performance line and changed the model number to Ford Performance M-12405-35T. I ordered three sets so I can keep some on hand and bought a nice gapper tool so I can gap them down to .026 as recommended for nearly any tuned EB. I'll report back how the truck runs after I get them put in tomorrow.
That part number (M-12405-35T) is slotted for the 3.5 Ecoboost V6 motors- only sold in sets of 6. The Ford Performance plugs that are specked for the 2018 2.3 Focus RS and Mustang 2.3 Ecoboost are M-12405-20T, said to be 2 steps colder than stock. Any reason you chose the plugs for the V6 ecoboost from Ford Performance? Or is it the same plug as the M-12405-20T? All Ecoboost plugs seem to be the same configuration. The M-12405-20T are also a lot more expensive for some reason.
 
Last edited:

Superdannyboy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Threads
24
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
1,350
Location
75209
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT Sport Appearance Package
Anyone running the NGK ruthenium one step colder?

5 star recommends swapping plugs at 30-35k miles and I'm at 41k!

Is it 95605?

When I type in the specs of the truck rockauto gives me PN 90495 which is heat range 6
 

Ranger2020zoomzoom

Well-Known Member
First Name
Patrick
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
50
Reaction score
30
Location
Mesa
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger
Occupation
Na
Anyone running the NGK ruthenium one step colder?

5 star recommends swapping plugs at 30-35k miles and I'm at 41k!

Is it 95605?

When I type in the specs of the truck rockauto gives me PN 90495 which is heat range 6
Did you ever find out the one step colder plugs and where did you get them?
 

Wytchdctr

Well-Known Member
First Name
Doug P.
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Threads
54
Messages
1,539
Reaction score
4,220
Location
Westside Htown, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 XLT
Occupation
Retired Military/HR Manager
Run old school copper a step colder and change with every oil change (they are cheap). Worked with my nitrous injector stupid mobile.

Just... lots of changing plugs.
 

Ranger2020zoomzoom

Well-Known Member
First Name
Patrick
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
50
Reaction score
30
Location
Mesa
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger
Occupation
Na
Okay, so I was assuming my truck had the sp542(one step colder plugs) based on other EB platforms and what @tjanok found above. However, my truck indeed had sp578 (CYFS12YPT) in it. Picture below, they donā€™t look great after 24.9k miles but 19k of those have been while running the 93 performance tune. I installed the sp542 one step colder plugs (ford performance part number above) and I can say with certainty that the truck runs and idles more smoothly. Iā€™m glad I changed them out for sure.
8C0206B9-706F-415F-80FB-67B12005CA54.jpeg
So the colder plugs are part # Ford Performance M-12405-35T? Itā€™s not me itā€™s the Jack Daniels.
 

Zetterbeard

Well-Known Member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
124
Reaction score
112
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2020 FORD RANGER XLT 4X4
Vehicle Showcase
1

Zetterbeard

Well-Known Member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
124
Reaction score
112
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2020 FORD RANGER XLT 4X4
Vehicle Showcase
1
Think these are equal or is the one you got better?

NGK 95822 Laser Iridium Spark Plugs
Honestly not too sure, went FP so I wouldn't be wondering if it was the right temp.
 

Simbyote

Member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
39
Location
Woodstock, GA
Vehicle(s)
'20 Ranger XLT Black Pack RWD
Occupation
Refrigeration / Food Equipment Tech
I'll leave this here for anyone searching.
Another post in this thread mentioned the M-12405-20T, and I ended up ordering those after figuring the only difference being a 4-ct pack instead of the 6-ct pack (2.0L vs 3.5L). I was also convinced they'd be the same plugs after reading a bunch of other EB forum posts.
Here is what I've learned:
The Ranger was manufactured with SP542 plugs originally, at some point the factory changed to SP578, so which one you have from the mfg will vary.
The M-12405-35T are a plug 1-Step colder than the stock SP542 plug, which is no longer available.
The M-12405-20T are 2-Steps colder than that same (original) stock plug.
The SP542 was replaced by the SP578. Which is also being replaced by the SP594.
After getting impatient and dealing with dealers and parts houses that were less than helpful, I just went with the SP594 plugs and put them in a rush on a Friday evening only to find that my truck started misfiring under heavy load/throttle/under boost. (I'm running the 5-Star Tuning 93Perf).
So I put the factory plugs back in until the M1240520T's came in.
Finally tonight I received the cold plugs (ordered from Levitown ford) which do seem to be packaged by Ford Performance.
The M-12405-20T is a plug manufactured by Denso (P#ITV24) used by Ford Performance in some of their performance packages. (This was immediately obvious after opening the package).
There are some subtle differences in the sizing of the plug which you can see in the pic and they are pre-gapped to .028(confirmed); but the plug body (seat to tip) is the same so I decided to give it a try.
All that said; I allowed the truck to warm up and gave it a 10mi light break-in and she is running beautifully.
In summary:
The Denso ITV24 can be used, works well and can be had for $10ea on Amazon. I spent about 6hrs and $180 to figure this out so hopefully someone else can benefit also.
Cheers
>>>>> Plug Pic Left to Right: (Stock) SP578, Denso ITV24{Ford M-12405-20T}, OEM Rplmnt SP594

IMG_5319.jpg


IMG_5323.jpg


IMG_5324.jpg


IMG_5325.jpg
Sponsored

 
 



Top