Sponsored

MPG Hypothetical Comparison

staryoshi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
143
Reaction score
415
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Touring
Occupation
Data Guy
Trying to approximate this hypothetical comparison, but cannot drive to test...

At 60 MPH on country roads, about how would the Ranger and the F-150 with the 2.7 stack up? Both 2021 4x4 models, no off-road/performance-affecting packages.

Any insight?
Thanks.
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
OP
OP

staryoshi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
143
Reaction score
415
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Touring
Occupation
Data Guy
F-150 will win if it is geared high and unloaded.
That's kind of what I'm thinking due to the aerodynamics of the two. It's gonna be a daily driver for about a 60 mile round trip in the sticks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

Joeiconic

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
1,747
Reaction score
5,922
Location
Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ranger XLT
Occupation
Retired
You will never make up the price difference between a Ranger and F150 in gas cost savings.
 

slowmachine

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
929
Reaction score
1,978
Location
New Hampshire
Vehicle(s)
2015 Jeep Wrangler, waiting for a Ranger PHEV
If you’re trying to save money, total operating cost per mile, or total operating cost per year, are better measures than MPG. Comparably equipped, doing the same work, I would bet on the F150 being significantly more expensive than the Ranger.
 


D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
A quick Google search tells me that both the Ranger and F-150 share the exact same gear ratios. As best I can tell the 2.7 comes with a 3:55 or 3:73 rear-end ratio. For the sake of the discussion, let's say you option with the 3:73, the same as the Ranger.

Edit: Forgot to finish my thought.

The two engines will run the same rpm at the same speed.

Gotta imagine the 6cyl will take more fuel to do so.

Plus the F-150 is heavier.

Ranger wins.
 

Joeiconic

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
1,747
Reaction score
5,922
Location
Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ranger XLT
Occupation
Retired
A 4x4 F150 with the 2.7 has and EPA rating of 19/24 and a 4x4 Ranger is 20/24. It’s not going to be enough of a difference to be a deciding factor.
 

LoneRNGR

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
May 8, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
470
Reaction score
862
Location
Lubbock, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XLT
Occupation
Systems Engineer
Gotta imagine the 6cyl will take more fuel to do so.

Plus the F-150 is heavier.
6 cylinder has different fuel injection and turbos. F-150 is only about 400 lbs more. I’ve driven both. F-150 gets better mileage.
 

DHMag

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dale
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Threads
24
Messages
655
Reaction score
663
Location
San Antonio, TX
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT Crew cab, 22 Wrangler Willys
tire size will change RPM, as well as Coefficient of drag affecting MPG.
 

D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
6 cylinder has different fuel injection and turbos. F-150 is only about 400 lbs more. I’ve driven both. F-150 gets better mileage.
In the real world. Definitely possible.

But the OP is asking ONLY about a hypothetical situation driving 2 trucks down the same road at a constant speed.

Of course the 2.7 will use less fuel to accelerate at the same rate. Of course given real scenarios, one might get better gas mileage out if the F-150. Either way the difference is very much insignificant.

The 2.7 fuel injection system only adds multi-port to the direct port injection for longevity.
 

D Fresh

Banned
Banned
First Name
Doug
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Threads
20
Messages
6,272
Reaction score
13,570
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'20 Lariat FX4, '17 FiST, '16 CX-5, '95 YJ
Occupation
Milkman
tire size will change RPM, as well as Coefficient of drag affecting MPG.
True, forgot to include tire size in my hypothesis.

Regardless, that's enough thinking about a hypothetical situation for a hypothetical truck purchase for me.
 
OP
OP

staryoshi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
143
Reaction score
415
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Touring
Occupation
Data Guy
The discussion has been useful for me so far, thanks. Struggling deciding between a SuperCrew Ranger and a Supercab F-150.

I won't get too deep into my conundrum, but they're closer in price than I would like and the F-150 feels much more current, but the Ranger is better-sized for my needs. Making up the difference in price via fuel economy isn't my objective... But balancing efficiency/utility is important to me.

Again, I appreciate the help thus far, I have weird priorities...

I can get very exact in what I'm comparing if anyone wants to go down that rabbit hole btw :p
Sponsored

 
 








Top