Sponsored

Diesel Tuner Jailed

dtech

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Threads
38
Messages
3,136
Reaction score
7,581
Location
colorado
Vehicle(s)
Ranger Lariat FX4, chromed and forever damperless

Rp930

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
3,514
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜19 Ford Ranger Lariat, ā€˜23 Macan,’21 Shelby GT500
Occupation
Retired
Apparently he knew the right people.
 
OP
OP
got3fords

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
131
Messages
5,319
Reaction score
13,811
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional
Apparently he knew the right people.
I read the entire article. He was helping everyone who needed help, even localities with diesel buses, fire engines etc. He was helping keep people in business due to outrageous maintenance costs. Did he break the law? Technically so I guess, but there were numerous other people doing the exact same thing, and he was used to make an example of.
Did he know the right people? Yeah, he knew and reached out to common sense conservatives who knew he was just trying to help people.
 

Rp930

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
3,514
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜19 Ford Ranger Lariat, ā€˜23 Macan,’21 Shelby GT500
Occupation
Retired
I read the entire article. He was helping everyone who needed help, even localities with diesel buses, fire engines etc. He was helping keep people in business due to outrageous maintenance costs. Did he break the law? Technically so I guess, but there were numerous other people doing the exact same thing, and he was used to make an example of.
Did he know the right people? Yeah, he knew and reached out to common sense conservatives who knew he was just trying to help people.
When you invest a million in test equipment to beat the EPA you are doing more than ā€helping peopleā€. You were profiting big time.
 


OP
OP
got3fords

got3fords

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
131
Messages
5,319
Reaction score
13,811
Location
22973
Vehicle(s)
2026 Marsh Gray Ranger Raptor, 1995 Harley XLH1200
Occupation
Mom Joke Professional
When you invest a million in test equipment to beat the EPA you are doing more than ā€helping peopleā€. You were profiting big time.
Every business invests in test equipment and R&D as needed. I'm going with the defense's argument below because, it makes reasonable sense. But you are free to disagree.

"Yes, reports confirm that Troy Lake, the owner of Elite Diesel in Wyoming, invested roughly $1 million in sophisticated testing equipment that was central to his conflict with the EPA.

While his goal was technically to "bypass" or "delete" EPA-mandated emissions systems, the narrative around why he made this investment depends on who you ask:

The "Million Dollar" Investment
According to court documents and interviews with his family, Lake’s business, Elite Diesel, spent heavily on high-end research tools:
  • $1 million+ was spent on equipment like engine and chassis dynamometers (dynos).
  • ~$325,000 was spent specifically on an "EPA test bench."
  • ~$350,000 was spent on research and development.
Did he do it to "beat" the EPA?
In a technical sense, yes. The equipment allowed him to reverse-engineer the complex computer codes in modern diesel trucks.
  • The Technical Win: He successfully figured out how to remove emissions hardware (like DPFs and EGRs) and reprogram the truck's computer so it wouldn't go into "limp mode" (a safety feature that slows the truck down when emissions parts are missing).

  • The Defense's Argument: Lake and his supporters argued he wasn't trying to pollute, but rather to improve reliability. They claimed the EPA-mandated systems caused frequent breakdowns for working trucks (like school buses and ambulances) in cold Wyoming weather. They also claimed his high-tech tuning could make the engines run efficiently despite the deletions."
 

Rp930

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rick
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
3,514
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜19 Ford Ranger Lariat, ā€˜23 Macan,’21 Shelby GT500
Occupation
Retired
Every business invests in test equipment and R&D as needed. I'm going with the defense's argument below because, it makes reasonable sense. But you are free to disagree.

"Yes, reports confirm that Troy Lake, the owner of Elite Diesel in Wyoming, invested roughly $1 million in sophisticated testing equipment that was central to his conflict with the EPA.

While his goal was technically to "bypass" or "delete" EPA-mandated emissions systems, the narrative around why he made this investment depends on who you ask:

The "Million Dollar" Investment
According to court documents and interviews with his family, Lake’s business, Elite Diesel, spent heavily on high-end research tools:
  • $1 million+ was spent on equipment like engine and chassis dynamometers (dynos).
  • ~$325,000 was spent specifically on an "EPA test bench."
  • ~$350,000 was spent on research and development.
Did he do it to "beat" the EPA?
In a technical sense, yes. The equipment allowed him to reverse-engineer the complex computer codes in modern diesel trucks.
  • The Technical Win: He successfully figured out how to remove emissions hardware (like DPFs and EGRs) and reprogram the truck's computer so it wouldn't go into "limp mode" (a safety feature that slows the truck down when emissions parts are missing).

  • The Defense's Argument: Lake and his supporters argued he wasn't trying to pollute, but rather to improve reliability. They claimed the EPA-mandated systems caused frequent breakdowns for working trucks (like school buses and ambulances) in cold Wyoming weather. They also claimed his high-tech tuning could make the engines run efficiently despite the deletions."
We will never know all the facts to this case. Making engines run ā€œefficientlyā€ is not the same as making engines run without cancer causing pollutants. Guilty as hell and got away with it.
 
 








Top