2020 Ranger: Will it get the 2.7 V-6 Eco Boost?

[RedlandRanger]

I anticipated this type of reply.

The v6 is more powerful than the 4, yes?
I have a 4cyl turbo in my garage, it's not a Ranger though but has similar 4 banger turbo power #'s and weighs 300lbs less. I not that impressed, hence why I would buy the v6 if it were an option. I am sure many prospect Ranger buyers would buy the v6 if it were an option. Most here already own a Ranger, thus a 4 banger.



If the 2.7 v6 was available, I would buy the v6 option. I would take the 400lb-ft v6 option w/o regard to the wimpy 4cyl.

But I still don't really understand the question. 2020 Ranger does not appear to have a v6 option.

Ranger and Bronco will essentially be the same vehicle wearing different skin. When this happens the v6 in some fashion will be available. Apparently Ford will make another yearly run on the current platform, so nothing new for Ranger until year model 2021.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/a31079/new-ford-bronco-ranger-details/

The V6 in the Tacoma is most definitely NOT more powerful than the 4 banger in the Ranger - test drive it, I dare you. It has surprised a lot of people - including me. Until you test drive it, you have no idea what you are talking about. The 4 banger along with the 10 speed is one of the best things about this truck - and I will say it is better than any other powertrain in its class.

Sponsored

 

[joeb427]

I anticipated this type of reply.

The v6 is more powerful than the 4, yes?
I have a 4cyl turbo in my garage, it's not a Ranger though but has similar 4 banger turbo power #'s and weighs 300lbs less. I not that impressed, hence why I would buy the v6 if it were an option. I am sure many prospect Ranger buyers would buy the v6 if it were an option. Most here already own a Ranger, thus a 4 banger.



If the 2.7 v6 was available, I would buy the v6 option. I would take the 400lb-ft v6 option w/o regard to the wimpy 4cyl.

But I still don't really understand the question. 2020 Ranger does not appear to have a v6 option.

Ranger and Bronco will essentially be the same vehicle wearing different skin. When this happens the v6 in some fashion will be available. Apparently Ford will make another yearly run on the current platform, so nothing new for Ranger until year model 2021.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/a31079/new-ford-bronco-ranger-details/

The 'wimpy' V6 in the Tacoma is not more powerful than the 2.3l 4. Not even close. Would I like the Mustang's same 2.3l with 310 HP? Sure but the 2.3l with 270 HP and 310 lbs torque is still quick.

 

[dmeyer302]

We lived through this same argument when the 3.5 EB was coming out in the F-150. “It’s not a V8” “Have you looked at the numbers?” “Yeah...but V8!” 10 years later they’re not even close to looking back. Let the trolls drive their V6s, we’ll be over here enjoying our power.

 

[RedlandRanger]

I think part of the reason the powertrain works so well is not just the HP and torque, but the 10 speed. They did a great job mating them together and making them complement each other. As I've said multiple times, I think the powertrain is the best feature of this truck. The fact that you can get it on any level is even better (i.e. - you don't have to buy a Lariat to get the good powertrain).

I don't think numbers tell the whole story.

 

[VAMike]

Don't feed the trolls

 

[Hounddog409]

Offer the v6, I'd buy that over the wimpy 4cyl.

There would likely be way more Ranger sales if a v6 was available because many folks, like myself, don't need a F150 but would be happy with the motor the F150 offers.

And it's only a 2.7L v6, my Tacoma was a 4cyl 2.7L. A turbo'd 2.7L 4cyl Toyota motor kicks ass.

We can't argue dismal Ranger sales, but what's the point about arguing about a non-existent v6 option for Ranger? If the v6 was an option I would choose that. It's the same premise why many Tacoma buyers opt for the v6 instead of the 4cyl. And it's stupid to say the Ford 4cyl is way better than the [put maker name here] 4 or 6cyl, because people are not buying for just the motor, they are buying brand/model/features/price!

Wimpy 4? WTF are you talking about? 310 lb ft of torque At 3000 rmp. That is better than any V6 in its class. By far.

That wimpy 4 also has more payload and towing in its class. More than the competitors v6.

Nothing in your post is factual.

You would buy a less powerful v6 because it's a v6? That's assinine.

 

[VAMike]

Why does anybody care about sales numbers? I got the truck I wanted (I assume you all did the same) and I couldn’t care less how many are sold beyond that.

Well, it's nice if they sell enough that there are aftermarket products and mechanics are familiar with them, etc, but that doesn't seem like it'll be an issue. Certainly it doesn't matter much who sells the most. (Unless, I guess, if you're unhappy and need validation?)

 

[chuck stein]

Wimpy 4? WTF are you talking about? 310 lb ft of torque At 3000 rmp. That is better than any V6 in its class. By far.

That wimpy 4 also has more payload and towing in its class. More than the competitors v6.

Nothing in your post is factual.

You would buy a less powerful v6 because it's a v6? That's assinine.

Comparing a turbo to non turbo motor is apples & oranges, sorry.

I was talking about the Ford motors, and was not comparing. If I put a Turbo on the 2.7L 4cyl Toyota motor, it can match Ford's 2.7L v6 and beat the balls off of the Ford 2.3L.

But, let's not get into a this/that argument. Eco boost 2.7L is way better than the Eco boost 2.3L, I want the 2.7L v6. But oh crap, can't get the v6 because it's not an option, case closed.

And for me, maybe I wait for the 6g Ranger that will have a v6 option.

 

[chuck stein]

We lived through this same argument when the 3.5 EB was coming out in the F-150. “It’s not a V8” “Have you looked at the numbers?” “Yeah...but V8!” 10 years later they’re not even close to looking back. Let the trolls drive their V6s, we’ll be over here enjoying our power.

Not even sure what this means. "Let them drive their v6's" ?? We are discussing the 2.3 vs 2.7v6 of FORD engines. If the v6 was a damn option I would buy that w/o question, and, if the v6 was an option Ford Ranger would not be behind Frontier sales, and the Frontier has shi-t for motor options.

The argument that "I have my Ranger, so who cares about sales #'s". Well, if you want resale value then the truck should be in good demand for years to come, which of course the Ranger is not, sales #'s tell us that. My Tacoma I sold, a 13yr old truck, I got back more than 50% of what I paid for it, including taxes and title. Resale value is a big metric for many buyers.

 

[joeb427]

Comparing a turbo to non turbo motor is apples & oranges, sorry.

I was talking about the Ford motors, and was not comparing. If I put a Turbo on the 2.7L 4cyl Toyota motor, that can match Ford's 2.7L v6 and beat the balls off of the Ford 2.3L.

But, let's not get into a this/that argument. Eco boost 2.7L is way better than the Eco boost 2.3L, I want the 2.7L v6. But oh crap, can't get the v6 because it's not an option, case closed.

And for me, maybe I wait for the 6g Ranger that will have a v6 option.

You'll probably have to buy a Ranger Raptor when available. That's the only Ranger that will probably have a 2.7l v6.

 

[chuck stein]

You'll probably have to buy a Ranger Raptor when available. That's the only Ranger that will probably have a 2.7l v6.

Ok, but I don't want or need a Raptor, nor do most mid and full size truck buyers.

If you can't get a v6 option for Ranger, what makes you think the wits at Ford think bringing Ranger Raptor to the US would be fruitful?

I just want a Ranger XLT with v6. I guess I can't get that.

 

[RedlandRanger]

Don't feed the trolls

Good advice

 

[joeb427]

Ok, but I don't want or need a Raptor, nor do most mid and full size truck buyers.

If you can't get a v6 option for Ranger, what makes you think the wits at Ford think bringing Ranger Raptor to the US would be fruitful?

I just want a Ranger XLT with v6. I guess I can't get that.

"Expect any U.S. model of the little Raptor to be powered by Ford’s 2.7-liter EcoBoost V-6, with outputs similar to the 335 horsepower and 380 lb-ft "

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a16740549/2019-ford-ranger-raptor-officially-unveiled-news/

 

[chuck stein]

Good advice

Where are the trolls? I am nit picking a truck I want to buy, so you call people like that trolls. Not sure how many trucks you have owned over the past 25yrs, my guess not many.

Tacoma has very good options. I can get 4 or 6cyl in base bare models or via steps into the all out TRD Offroad crud. No wonder Tacoma is the best selling truck and hold best resale value, maybe Ford should follow that model?

I am waiting for my local dealer to tell me they can order a 2020 Ranger. Until then I am truckless.

But the original question is like asking "when will we send a man to mars?". Who knows, but like Ford, NASA has no meaningful answers currently, so as of now and near future, it's a no-go.

 

[joeb427]

Where are the trolls? I am nit picking a truck I want to buy, so you call people like that trolls. Not sure how many trucks you have owned over the past 25yrs, my guess not many.

Tacoma has very good options. I can get 4 or 6cyl in base bare models or via steps into the all out TRD Offroad crud. No wonder Tacoma is the best selling truck and hold best resale value, maybe Ford should follow that model?

I am waiting for my local dealer to tell me they can order a 2020 Ranger. Until then I am truckless.

But the original question is like asking "when will we send a man to mars?". Who knows, but like Ford, NASA has no meaningful answers currently, so as of now and near future, it's a no-go.

You're not going to go Ranger because it will be a 2.3L 4.

Sponsored