Sponsored

This platform is liking the power so far

13 Second Ranger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jul 17, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
155
Reaction score
242
Location
West Palm Beach
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
Just had some tuning done on the Ranger and she is a tire fryer!! very pleased so far with the results. I have a vendor that contacted me to set the bar on this platform and game is on. This data is all prior to that conversation and only the start. Attached is on 93 octane stock, tune, and tune with off the shelf octane booster (with AFE charge pipes and 3" cat back exhaust). These are all on a set of heavy Fuel wheels and tires. 0-60 is 5.7 seconds with traction issues. Stay tuned as big things are coming for this truck in the next couple of weeks that will require sticky tires and track time....and a good amount more power.

RANGER DYNO2.JPG


RANGER DYNO3.webp
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

395Runner

Member
First Name
Gabe
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
19
Reaction score
32
Location
SoCal to Sierra Nevada
Vehicle(s)
2019 Magnetic FX4 Lariat, 350whp 2006 WRX Wagon
Cool! Great numbers. Looking forward to someone dyno tuning these trucks on the west coast... although Florida gets to have all the the fun with 93 gas and that dense humid air!

Interesting to see the use of octane booster here. I was always wondering if it was a 'legit' anti-knock additive in high-boost applications. Seems to do the job.

Just to be clear, did you have the charge pipes and exhaust on for all the runs?
 
OP
OP

13 Second Ranger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jul 17, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
155
Reaction score
242
Location
West Palm Beach
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
Cool! Great numbers. Looking forward to someone dyno tuning these trucks on the west coast... although Florida gets to have all the the fun with 93 gas and that dense humid air!

Interesting to see the use of octane booster here. I was always wondering if it was a 'legit' anti-knock additive in high-boost applications. Seems to do the job.

Just to be clear, did you have the charge pipes and exhaust on for all the runs?
Stock for baseline and tune...pipes and exhaust on boost tune.
 

Lunchbox88

Well-Known Member
First Name
Logan
Joined
Jun 21, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
335
Reaction score
303
Location
Missouri, USA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger SuperCrew FX4
Wow those are some great dyno numbers! Im honestly surprised the charge pipes and the exhaust made that much of a difference.
 

t4thfavor

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chance
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
2,607
Reaction score
2,357
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XLT FX4 Fox 2.0, 2011 Ford Edge Sport
Wow those are some great dyno numbers! Im honestly surprised the charge pipes and the exhaust made that much of a difference.
I'd like to see the dyno with stock charge pipes and the aftermarket exhaust as I suspect most of the gains are from the free flowing exhaust.

The octane booster I've seen is basically ethanol, I'd think you would get similar results on E30 or E50, whatever the truck's fuel system can handle.

The mustangs, and RS's are 375+ with similar mods (factory charge pipes on upgraded FMIC), so I'm certain there's more in it for this truck.

We might even have a bigger/better FMIC than the mustang, so it might be attainable without replacing that part.
 
OP
OP

13 Second Ranger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jul 17, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
155
Reaction score
242
Location
West Palm Beach
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
I'd like to see the dyno with stock charge pipes and the aftermarket exhaust as I suspect most of the gains are from the free flowing exhaust.

The octane booster I've seen is basically ethanol, I'd think you would get similar results on E30 or E50, whatever the truck's fuel system can handle.

The mustangs, and RS's are 375+ with similar mods (factory charge pipes on upgraded FMIC), so I'm certain there's more in it for this truck.

We might even have a bigger/better FMIC than the mustang, so it might be attainable without replacing that part.
Same tune without charge pipes or exhaust were only a couple of HP less on the 93 only tune. I thought there would be more to gain, and didn't even feel a seat of the pants difference. Once the power starts going up, these supporting mods are needed. I really wish there was a good intake for these trucks...the factory one looks like it chokes in a couple of places. My ecoboost mustang had higher HP numbers but the wheels on this truck are super heavy. About 30lbs per wheel/tire which has some affect on it. The Mustang had a catless downpipe that definitely free'd up some power but I don't want the noise that I had with the Mustang. This truck will be above the E30 and E50 that are tough to obtain locally without mixing. And hopefully we will be ok with the factory FMIC with the cooler fuel we will be using.
Sponsored

 
 








Top