OFC Ranger
Well-Known Member
I suspect there is a direct correlation between decline in QC vs total options on a vehicle offered, as well as the amount of models/trim offered.You know what seems to kill companies in the long term - trying to be the biggest automaker in the world. Remember when Ford did it and QC and service went out the window, they may have been making more cars than anyone else, but many of them were shit cars.
Then Toyota, that rightly labeled bastion of quality and reliability definitely seemed to lose something after their time on top, Nissan tried, and it killed them, once they were considered equal or nearly equal in quality to Toyota, now stuck in bed with Renault and Mitsubishi. And Volkswagen - well the less said there the better.
Maybe Henry Ford was right when he (allegedly) said to one of his favourite staff - I don't want all of the market Charlie, 1/3 will be enough.
Adding a bunch of extra fluff means no capacity to manufacturer in house, this leads to out sourcing, this leads to QC problems. Don't have to look back very far to see this, aka bronco hard tops.
That and the old proverb on stretching ones self too thin in regards to how many different things one can man in-house instead of hyper focusing on a select few.
Sponsored