I really dislike the 2.7 in the F150 which is where you get most of the deals. It does not drive the same as the 3.5 in the f150, and I don't understand the point of the engine (gimmicky). It doesn't provide enough power to justify the upgrade in a Ranger sized vehicle. The 2.3 seems to be better proportioned in my opinion. If you're towing in the f150 at all, the 2.7 gives you less and at worse fuel mileage.This is an interesting statement. What is it specifically about the 2.3 that you like better than the 2.7? Most people I've seen seem to want the 2.7 (I'm guessing due to more power and torque). I really like the 2.3 mated to the 10 speed.
Hard to beat those flat or almost flat floors with thw seats up.I initially got the Ranger for its smaller size and manuverabilty, but reached a point where the extra space was needed.
I traded it in for a 22 F150 Powerboost hybrid and do miss the smaller size and turn radius in a parking lot at times, but otherwise I'm loving the change. Took a weekend trip with all three dogs and it wasn't a complete shit show trying to get everyone to fit. It also has a lot of features I wished the Ranger even offered, like a power rear slider and Sync 4.
The pup approves it though.![]()
It's been a bonus. Along with a cavernous center console and eleventy-billion cubby holes. And torque, lots of it.. ? On the down side, sticker was 30k more than I paid for the Ranger...Hard to beat those flat or almost flat floors with thw seats up.