Floyd
Well-Known Member
One point not mentioned in this Lugging discussion.
Is boreXstroke.
Generally speaking, an over square engine needs more RPM in its "power curve" than an under square engine.
Previous Ford 2.3L engines (I.E. HSC and LIMA) were over square.
The 2.3L EcoBoost is under square, resulting in higher piston speeds compared to a comparable displacement over square engine, so it would naturally develop more power at lower RPM
and so tolerate more "lugging".
Now, I know that these are generalities and are both incremental and general in nature.
I also am aware that "Generalities are always false" ,
but it does certainly mitigate any absolutes.
Just a little food for thought
Is boreXstroke.
Generally speaking, an over square engine needs more RPM in its "power curve" than an under square engine.
Previous Ford 2.3L engines (I.E. HSC and LIMA) were over square.
The 2.3L EcoBoost is under square, resulting in higher piston speeds compared to a comparable displacement over square engine, so it would naturally develop more power at lower RPM
and so tolerate more "lugging".
Now, I know that these are generalities and are both incremental and general in nature.
I also am aware that "Generalities are always false" ,
but it does certainly mitigate any absolutes.
Just a little food for thought
Sponsored
Last edited:

