Do you have adaptive cruise? Mine will auto resume soon as I get off throttle. You can also adjust speed up and down with the +/- button on left side of steering wheel. But hitting the brake does cancel cruise control
IIRC you can just press RES to resume your last speed after hitting your brakes. Before the adaptive cruise control I use to just hit the cancel/resume button without using the brakes.
Your probably right but I also hardly ever touch the brakes on the highway so it’s never been an issue for me lolIIRC you can just press RES to resume your last speed after hitting your brakes. Before the adaptive cruise control I use to just hit the cancel/resume button without using the brakes.
Try loading it with some roof shingles Mike
I heard the same over at the Tacoma Forum about the 3rd GEN, and the paint being too thin as well. Honestley, I find my Lariat paint, and sheet metal better than on the Tacoma. My Tundra was better than both, yet it was a 2003. We can thank the mighty EPA for this.
Having a larger tank would be nice. On my 2018 Tacoma V6 4x4 with a 21.5 tank I would average 370-380miles, my 2003 Tundra V8 4x4 with a 26 Gallon tank would see at best 340 miles. Getting 400-470 with my 18 Gallon Ranger tank is not bad at all.
I'm pretty happy whit my 2019 Ranger - my 2005 Ranger with the 4l V6 only got 250-300 miles on a tank. I'm getting 350-400 on a tank easy with my new Ranger. It would be nice to have a slightly larger tank, but I don't find it to be an issue at all.
No it won't, you hit the + button and it will only speed up one mile at a time. So if you're set at 55, speed up five miles, you either have to hit the + button five times, or hit the RES/CAN button, THEN the + button.No need to turn it off. All you have to do is press the + and it will go to your new desired speed or simply hit set when you're at 60 and now that's your set speed.
I do, but I have it switched off.
I agree 100%, I have been nothing short of pleased with my new Ranger. Forums can be tough, a lot of folks like to vent or nit-pick, and it leaves the perception these are uniquie issues, when in fact they are issues seen with almost all vehicles on the road. I still find our Ranger forum 80-90% better than most when it comes to that and hope we all work to keep it that way. Thank you for giving up your time to be a MOD here.
wow consider me astonished! No matter how softly I drive I get nowhere near that mileage. I would like to try 87 to see the difference but I refuse to run ethanol so I'm just gonna assume it would be quite a bit worse. Although my old ranger didn't get much better at all with high octane. Still its good for a turbocharged engine to have high octane fuel.I ended up not making it all the way to 500 since there wasn't a fuel station at that point along our route, so I had to back out early. But doing hand calcs of everything (gallons used vs gallons remaining and mileage so far on that tank), I could've made it, with not much to spare though. I know one guy on here got 530 or so out of his (and 30+mpg) multiple times. I forget who it was though.
That particular trip consisted mainly of smooth, relatively flat, highway (60mph) driving with some small sections of rural towns (35mph) and portions of faster sections (70mph). It's not something everyone can achieve obviously, but since that's how most of our trips go around here, I can benefit from it. The minute you go faster, gun it taking off from a light, or have to climb a steep hill it drops. So again, not achievable for everybody on a regular basis, but it is possible.
My next goal is to actually hit 500 on the miles traveled. Probably won't be able to do it until spring, since winter is coming and that doesn't help mileage.
